Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About Felicia Sonmez  |  twitter  On Twitter: @2chambers  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Felicia  |  Articles
Posted at 7:26 PM ET, 03/ 9/2011

House to defend the Defense of Marriage Act in court

By Felicia Sonmez

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) announced Wednesday evening that the House will defend in court the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act. The action comes after President Obama instructed the Justice Department last month to no longer defend the law, which bans the federal recognition of same-sex marriage.

"Today, after consultation with the Bipartisan Leadership Advisory Group, the House General Counsel has been directed to initiate a legal defense of this law," Boehner said in a statement. "This action by the House will ensure that this law's constitutionality is decided by the courts, rather than by the President unilaterally."

The Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group consists of three Republican members of the House -- Boehner, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (Va.) and Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (Calif.) -- and two Democrats: Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Md.).

The group has the authority to instruct House General Counsel Kerry Kirchner to take legal action on behalf of the lower chamber, and it often gets involved in situations where House leaders believe there are institutional or separation-of-powers issues involved.

Pelosi tweeted Wednesday evening that she and Hoyer voted against the resolution while Boehner, Cantor and McCarthy voted for it.

The resolution calls on the speaker to direct the House General Counsel to "take such steps as he considers appropriate," including filing an amicus brief, to "protect the interests of the House in litigation in which the Attorney General has ceased to defend the constitutionality of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act."

Pelosi expressed concern over the potential cost and length of such an intervention.

"Given the complexity and number of cases, this legal challenge would sap hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars, if not more, during a time of limited fiscal resources," she said. "Pursuing this legal challenge distracts from our core challenges: creating jobs, strengthening the middle class, and responsibly reducing the deficit."

By Felicia Sonmez  | March 9, 2011; 7:26 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Senate rejects two long-term funding bills, sending leaders back to negotiating table
Next: Peter King's hearing on Islamic radicalization


Republicants used to be OK with presidents making unilateral decisions. What's changed?

Posted by: Rudesan | March 10, 2011 9:25 AM | Report abuse

"Republicants used to be OK with presidents making unilateral decisions. What's changed?"

That only counts when its a Repuglican president making the unilateral decisions.

Posted by: pnwmainah1 | March 10, 2011 9:46 AM | Report abuse

Pelosi .. fresh off of 4 years of her presiding over unbridled inadvisable government spending has the gall to use the cost of such litigation as her excuse.

Posted by: Hazmat77 | March 10, 2011 12:17 PM | Report abuse

Gee I am sure glad the House GOP is focused on JOB CREATION instead of pandering to their base. Oh wait...

Posted by: MarcMyWords | March 10, 2011 2:43 PM | Report abuse

If Congress passes any law, then it should be prepared to defend the law's constitutionality in court... and out of Congress's own budget.

Posted by: dooleyj | March 10, 2011 5:32 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company