Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
About Felicia Sonmez  |  twitter  On Twitter: @2chambers  |  RSS Feeds RSS Feed  |  E-Mail Felicia  |  Articles
Posted at 7:22 PM ET, 03/ 8/2011

Rand Paul to vote against both Republican and Democratic funding resolutions

By Felicia Sonmez

At least one Senate Republican is planning to vote against both House Republicans' plan to cut $61 billion across federal agencies and Senate Democrats' plan to cut about $5 billion.

Kentucky's Rand Paul, one of the founding members of the Senate Tea Party Caucus, said Tuesday he will vote against both measures when they come up for votes Wednesday afternoon.

"I can't vote for anything that incorporates spending that would give us a deficit of a trillion and a half," Paul said. "I think that's too much."

The move marks Paul's latest vote against his party's leadership; he has parted ways with Senate Republicans on several other votes this session, including a measure extending key provisions of the Patriot Act and a bill to prohibit the aiming of laser pointers at aircraft.

West Virginia Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin, who is up for reelection in 2012, announced earlier Tuesday that he intends to vote against both measures because they are two "wildly different proposals" that represent ideological extremes.

Two other moderate Democrats up for reelection in 2012, Sens. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) and Ben Nelson (Neb.), declined to say Tuesday night how they planned to vote on the funding measures.

Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski, another moderate, said she had made up her mind but wasn't ready to announce her vote on Tuesday. "I'm trying to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good here," she said.

Earlier Tuesday, Sen. Richard Lugar (R-Ind.) announced his support for the House Republican measure after previously saying he'd vote against it. Another moderate Republican, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), said Tuesday night he would vote in favor of the House Republican plan.

"In a month in which we've borrowed over $200 billion just to run the government, we're clearly approaching a point of some economic danger," said Kirk, who in November won the seat previously held by President Obama.

By Felicia Sonmez  | March 8, 2011; 7:22 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Rep. Eric Cantor defends Rep. Peter King's hearings on radical Islam
Next: Lawmakers threaten to hold up Korea trade deal

Comments

Rand Paul has an IQ of 2.

Posted by: newagent99 | March 8, 2011 8:53 PM | Report abuse

Well, at least there's one representative of the people that is sticking to his ethics and beliefs instead to following the rest of the sheep just because his party says so.

Posted by: bigpapa_z | March 8, 2011 8:55 PM | Report abuse

newagent99 says "Rand Paul has an IQ of 2"

He may have an IQ of 2, but that is an increase over most members of congress.

Posted by: JoeyS1 | March 9, 2011 9:13 AM | Report abuse

@newagent99 - Your rather adolescent comment doesn't exactly exhibit a Mensa level of intelligence.

Posted by: thirty3na3rd | March 10, 2011 4:23 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company