The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

Bundle of Trouble for Edwards Donor

Federal prosecutors in Michigan have indicted Geoffrey Fieger, the man made famous for his defense of assisted suicide advocate Jack Kevorkian, for channeling $127,000 in illegal contributions into John Edwards's 2004 presidential campaign. Prosecutors said the activity was concealed from Edwards, and he has cooperated in the probe.

The 30-page indictment, which was unsealed Friday, lays out, check by check, a blueprint for how Fieger raised money and then, allegedly, reimbursed those donors with money from his law firm or with personal checks. In one instance described by the indictment, Fieger solicited donations for the Edwards campaign from two long-time friends, their spouses, and their family members. The two friends, identified only by their initials in the court papers, each produced $8,000 in checks for Edwards. Fieger than wrote each friend a check for $8,000, and had his law firm reimburse him for approximately $20,000. "The recorded reason for the check was 'repayment Edwards campaign," according to the indictment.

It is illegal for a corporation, such as a law firm, to channel money into a presidential campaign, and illegal to reimburse someone for a campaign contribution they have made. Fieger has denied the allegations and called the indictment politically motivated.

The indictment represents the latest illustration of how some big-dollar presidential donors -- known as bundlers -- are finding ways to raise huge sums for their preferred candidates, bundle them into contributions for which they receive credit. Pressure on bundlers to produce has only increased as the amount of money being dumped into presidential campaigns has skyrocketed this year. As the Post reported earlier this month, a sign of where this pressure is being applied is the rising number of contributions from secretaries, administrative assistants and executive assistants for whom a $1,000 political contribution is a major expense. At this point in the campaign four years ago, 127 donors making contributions listed one of those three occupations. In the first six months of this year the number was 526, and the average check was for nearly $800.

This is not the first time an Edwards donor has been caught up in such a scheme.

In June 2006, the Federal Election Commission announced that Tab Turner, a prominent trial lawyer, and his Little Rock law firm agreed to pay a $50,000 penalty for violating the ban on corporate contributions and contributions made in the name of another person.

The FEC also announced that Edwards for President, would pay a $9,500 penalty for accepting in-kind contributions from Turner's firm and contributions made by Turner in the name of relatives.The FEC said that in January 2003 employees of Turner's law firm worked with Edwards's staff to plan two fundraisers in Arkansas as part of their duties. Turner instructed his assistant to ask four other employees to make $2,000 contributions to the campaign (the maximum allowed by federal law) and then to reimburse them. Turner used his firm's credit card to give Edwards $2,000 and to make $2,000 donations in the name of his brother and sister-in-law, the FEC said. The agency said he also charged nearly $2,400 in hotel and rental car expenses for travel by Edwards's staff.
Edwards now circulates a three-page memo of guidelines to volunteer fundraisers, including a reminder in large print that the law "strictly prohibits reimbursement of contributions made by others."

"The 2004 Edwards for President campaign held itself to the highest standards and made every effort to fully comply with legal requirements for campaign finance, as does the current campaign," Edwards spokeswoman Colleen Murray said. "Senator Edwards expects his staff and supporters to do the same and live up to these standards."

Murray added that, "as the indictment makes clear, the 2004 Edwards for President campaign was unaware of these activities. We have and will continue to cooperate fully with the FEC and the Department of Justice. While we do not know if these charges will ultimately prove true, if he is found guilty, we will return this money in compliance with the law, FEC regulations and our own high ethical standards."

--Matthew Mosk

Posted at 4:15 PM ET on Aug 27, 2007
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: Republican Reaction
to Gonzales Exit
| Next: Bush Shows Thick Skin
With Fundraising Events


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



I think that the author of this article is basically against Edwards and is trying to tell people to not vote for Edwards in the elections by stating facts of his mistakes in allowing the contribution of money illegaly.

Posted by: karthikbleach | September 6, 2007 11:13 PM

John Edwards has a brilliant health care plan and has fought for the little guys and WON! against the powerful Insurance and Pharma industries - sponsors of the CORPORATE media and donating heavily to Hillary's campaign.

15 years - and Hillary still hasn't produced a health care plan! while John Edwards is EAGER to take on those industries so that ALL Americans can have affordable health care.

How many decades has Hillary been living off the government while the working poor and middle class with NO health care pay HER health care costs?

Posted by: annefrank | August 28, 2007 11:56 AM

More WaPo smears on Edwards.
Hmmm...wonder when WaPo will reveal that Rupert Murdoch and News Corp execs are sponsoring Hillary fundraisers and funding her campaign? while the corporate media attacks John Edwards 24/7.
Rupert Murdoch also bought Tony Blair in 1997.
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/57376

Posted by: annefrank | August 28, 2007 11:49 AM

John Edwards has rejected donations by Washington lobbyists and has expressed true independence from their influence. His policy papers have led the Democratic pack in detail and strategy.

He has recieved the most attacks on the part of any candidate from the Republicans. That is because he is the candidate who can both win over their working class base, as well as environmentalists and former Dean supporters.

He has the rare ability to take responsibility, admit mistakes, and change course, a trait severely lacking in recent leadership. He worked for Fortress, a hedge fund, but openly supports increasing taxes on hedge funds to match taxes on salaries. When he discovered that Fortress invested in subprime mortgages, he volunteered funds from his own investments to help victims.

He made his reputation as a trial lawyer but supports legislation to curb nuisance suits. His independence from special interests is exactly what the American public is asking for.

The mainstream media should not dismiss him just because he raises less money per quarter. Money does not equate to leadership or a stong nation. Money equates to politics as usual.

Posted by: CyberCitizen | August 27, 2007 11:48 PM

Here we go again.. just when Edwards gains any momentum. An out of the blue ( from 2004) questionable doubt is cast. The supposed perp Fiegler states this is all politically motivated. Duh! When are the American people going to wake up and realize they are being led by the nose by a corporate owned self-serving media disinformation machine. Why? because they know Edwards is the biggest threat in a General election. Its a matter of public record and Edwards lead is growing. They also know an Edwards presidency is an end to their 'business as usual" They will use anything in their power to destroy him. But Edwards is for the people, not them, and they want to hush him and his message up. Whenever people get to really hear Edwards message they are very impressed! Don't let these self serving powers that be steal another election, with candidates that walk in lock step with them all the while telling us they are for change and for we the people! Pull back the curtain where is the money coming from and going to??? Edwards cannot be bought, and they know it!
Edward 08'
The People's President

Posted by: asher13 | August 27, 2007 5:53 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company