Morning Cheat Sheet
A Surge of Support For War in GOP Debate
President Bush has regularly been criticized for presenting a rose-colored view of events in Iraq. But compared to some of the candidates running to succeed him, he looks like a downright pessimist.
Former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) made last night's Republican presidential debate a contest in who could be more unequivocal in declaring victory for the president's "surge" in Iraq, with each of them going further even than Bush. During his visit to Iraq this week, Bush was careful to tout what he saw as "progress" and "some security success" while also stressing what has not succeeded. No such nuance on stage last night.
A day after the Governmental Accountability Office reported that only three of 18 political and security
McCain, the most ardent war supporter running for president, quickly jumped in to criticize Romney -- not for overstating the results of the surge but for underestimating them.
"Governor, the surge is working," McCain chided. "The surge is working, sir. It is working."
"That's just what I said," Romney protested.
"No," McCain said. "Not apparently. It's working. It's working because we've got a great general. We've got a good strategy."
The exchange underscores the difference between campaigning and governing. Bush learned a long time ago to couch any claims of progress in Iraq with concessions about the failures and deep challenges ahead. He generally does not give good-news assessments without some sort of qualification because past assertions of success have proved illusory and have sapped his credibility with many Americans. And so even when he is trying to highlight the successes he does see, he makes a point of recognizing their limits.
Not so much on the campaign trail, where stark blacks and whites are demanded and shades of gray penalized. Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (N.Y.) saw that on the Democratic side last month when she offered an assessment of the surge that was more three-dimensional than some of her party activists preferred. While still criticizing the administration's approach in Iraq, she said of the current strategy that "it's working" in some places such as Anbar province, the western region where U.S. troops have teamed up with once-hostile Sunni tribal sheiks to take on al-Qaeda. That earned her nothing but grief from the blogosphere that saw it as a betrayal, even though Sen. Barack Obama (Ill.) more or less endorsed her view.
The presidential campaign, therefore, has pushed both sides further toward their extremes, forcing candidates to take starker positions and widening the gulf between the parties.
-- Peter Baker
Posted at 10:06 AM ET on Sep 6, 2007
Morning Cheat Sheet
Share This: Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: Thompson Makes White House
Bid Official on Tonight Show | Next: From the Waveland:
ISO a 'Real' Republican
Please email us to report offensive comments.
Posted by: logcabin1836 | September 7, 2007 1:10 PM
Posted by: jim | September 7, 2007 1:27 AM
Posted by: thetroubles | September 6, 2007 8:55 PM
Posted by: doubleblackdiva323 | September 6, 2007 8:02 PM
Posted by: chrisfox8 | September 6, 2007 2:46 PM
Posted by: antonio3 | September 6, 2007 1:52 PM
Posted by: lylepink | September 6, 2007 12:26 PM
Posted by: didereaux | September 6, 2007 12:22 PM
Posted by: jbritt3 | September 6, 2007 11:33 AM
Posted by: Bud0 | September 6, 2007 11:22 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.