Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

McCain's New Front

John McCain returned to Iowa on his "No Surrender" tour hoping the battle over the war in Iraq will breathe new life into his campaign. (AP).

Of all the warriors inspired to battle by the testimony of General David Petraeus, perhaps none is as eager to engage as Arizona Sen. John McCain, who is leading a public relations onslaught on behalf of the war in Iraq.

Even before his fellow senators had finished quizzing Petraeus on Tuesday, McCain had headed back to the presidential campaign trail to launch what he calls his "No Surrender" tour.

After jetting from Washington to Sioux City, Iowa on a private plane for a rally Tuesday evening, McCain offered a candidate's version of the general's measured but optimistic assessment of slow progress on the battlefield.

"This strategy is working. It is succeeding, and it must be given a chance to succeed," he said last night before boarding his campaign bus.

He will continue his tour in Council Bluffs, Des Moines and Waterloo today, as he attempts to rally support for the war -- and his flagging presidential campaign -- in advance of a Senate debate on the future of the Iraq effort.

Earlier this year, McCain's support for President Bush's war policy appeared to be an albatross around his neck. As support for the war sank, McCain appeared to be the presidential candidate most closely associated with a failing, unpopular policy.

Now, with Petraeus offering a plea for time and saying the surge is working, McCain may be in a better position to ask for voter support.

"I'm in the camp that thinks you can't count him out and he's not dead," Mike Murphy, a GOP consultant who worked for McCain's 200 campaign, said recently. "What happens if McCain beats Rudy [Giuliani] in Iowa? I think McCain gets another big bite at the apple."

For months, McCain has been trying to find a way to use his long-standing credibility as a straight-talker, especially on military issues, to his benefit as a candidate for president. His straight talk on immigration earlier this year helped sink his campaign.

His advisers are hoping the "No Surrender" tour will highlight McCain's experience with national security and his smarts in recognizing the value of the surge even when others did not.

In last week's Fox Republican debate, McCain offered a glimpse of how he hopes to use the issue to differentiate himself from his rivals. When former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney said the surge was "apparently" working, McCain quickly and sternly corrected him.

"It is working," McCain said. "Not apparently."

Sure enough, as McCain's campaign will be pointing out all week, Petraeus said the same thing in testimony Monday and Tuesday. "The military objectives of the surge are, in large measure, being met," he told House members and Senators.

McCain the senator vows to lead the expected fight in the Senate with Democrats later this month about the future war policy in Iraq. If it works the way he hopes, McCain the candidate might get a boost, too.

--Michael D. Shear

By Post Editor  |  September 12, 2007; 10:00 AM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Obama, Linking In
Ahead of the Curve

Next: War Top Issue Now,
Could Shift By '08


NOW you know why I had to make America's first ever politically CONSERVATIVE MUSIC CD! These people need to be heard in song.

I give them the 'Hollywood Treatment' in reverse.

Posted by: Truscott1 | September 13, 2007 2:41 PM | Report abuse

America's objective in Iraq is not to bring the troops home. The objective is to win.

And by win that means we seek to protect American interests in the middle east by the following: undermine hostile tyrants, stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the middle east, defeat terrorists in the key battlefront in Iraq, counterbalance Iran, protect trade, weaken radical Islam, promote democracy... the list of our interests and the world's interests in the region goes on and on...

When troops sign up for the military they sign up to achieve these objectives, not to sit at home!

Posted by: rserrato99 | September 12, 2007 4:57 PM | Report abuse

McCain's megaphone for the phony words of Gen Petreus and Amb Crocko' can't change the reality in Iraq. The US war was based on lies and the "progress" is all lies!

Of all men, McCain should be able to remember the lessons of Vietnam. There was another war started on false premises and one we were lied to about endlessly by the generals and the pols.

On both sides, the "leading" candidates seem to shrink from saying the words that need to be said. Cheney should be impeached FIRST for his treasonous acts allowing a jet to strike the Pentagon, then lying to the 9/11 Commission about it!

Bush should be impeached the next day for all the dragging down of America his lies and schemes have caused. Let the Constitution rise again!

Posted by: cmxarts | September 12, 2007 2:01 PM | Report abuse

Michael D. Shear writes
"[A]s McCain's campaign will be pointing out all week, Petraeus said the same thing in testimony Monday and Tuesday. "The military objectives of the surge are, in large measure, being met," he told House members and Senators."

What Senator McCain needs to do is connect the dots between the military objects that are 'largely' being met and the political objectives that are 'largely not' being met. The end game is still the same: stabilize Iraq & get our troops home. If our military is achieving its objectives but the Iraqi politicians are not achieving theirs, is there still a point to our being in Iraq?

Posted by: bsimon | September 12, 2007 12:26 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company