The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008


Dan Balz's Take

Reconsidering the Primary Calendar

WEST DES MOINES, Iowa -- I've just spent the last 45 minutes scraping more than a quarter inch of ice off of my rental car, which is parked outside a hotel in West Des Moines. Campaign '08 is officially in the deep freeze.

A few hours ago they closed the airport in Des Moines. A spokesman told one of the local television stations that he had been working at the airport for four years and it was only the second time he knew of it being closed. The first time, he said, was last week.

Two days ago, I was sitting on the 50 yard-line of the Williams-Brice football stadium at the University of South Carolina in shirtsleeves, waiting for the arrival of Barack and Michelle Obama and their new best friend, Oprah Winfrey.

Today I look out over I-80 in deteriorating conditions, the freezing rain now giving way to what the forecasters say could be several inches of snow. Traffic appears light on what is a main thoroughfare through the Midwest.

Where would you rather be?

The smart candidates aren't anywhere near Iowa today. Hillary Clinton is in California raising money and holding what her campaign billed as a conversation with billionaire Warren Buffet. Barack Obama is in Seattle for an evening rally.

They and others had expected to be debating in Los Angeles on Monday night until the forum was canceled because none of the candidates wanted to cross the picket line for the writers' strike. Lucky for Clinton and Obama that they didn't bail out on the entire West Coast trip.

Those unlucky enough to be in Iowa have had their schedules severely disrupted. John Edwards scrubbed the first stop of the day on his bus tour, but vowed to show up at events later today at cities along the Mississippi River. Mike Huckabee and surrogates Bill Clinton and Michelle Obama have canceled events in Iowa or otherwise adjusted their plans.

Frigid weather and blinding snow are part of the Iowa and New Hampshire political tradition. In 1988, a huge blizzard hit New Hampshire a few days before the primary, bringing campaigning to a halt. The lone beneficiary was Bob Dole. His endorsement press conference with Alexander Haig drew almost 300 bored members of the media who were trapped in Manchester.

Iowa is better known for bone-chilling temperatures and wind-chills well below zero. In 1996 a cold-spell settled in over Iowa with actual temperatures below zero for days. My colleague Roger Simon of recalls that one weather reporter tossed a glass of water into the air and it came down as snowflakes -- though he concedes that may just be campaign lore.

Perhaps it's time to rethink the entire nomination calendar with an eye toward the weather. There are lots of proposals kicking around to repair this broken system, none clearly better than any other. Why not let the weather dictate?

That would mean starting in New Hampshire during leaf season the year before the general election. New Hampshire Secretary of State Bill Gardner had threatened to push the primary into December of this year. Why not just leapfrog everyone and set it in early October of 2011? What better time to spend in New England?

Given my experience on Sunday, I'm now partial to South Carolina having a winter contest. Currently that state's primaries will be on Jan. 19 (Republicans) and Jan. 26 (Democrats). But if New Hampshire goes into the year before, South Carolina should do the same -- sometime in early December.

Nevada will hold the third Democratic event of this campaign, with caucuses on Jan. 19. No one knows whether there will be many people turning out for those caucuses, since the state has no tradition of real participation. But next time around, why not schedule the Nevada caucuses for New Year's Eve?

Reporters, who have generally avoided Nevada this year, would flock to Las Vegas for the chance to party on the Strip while live-blogging the results. Even if no one votes, it will be a rich story.

Florida has tried to muscle its way forward this year, to the chagrin of the Democratic National Committee. Rather than penalize them, why not reward their aggressiveness with a mid-January primary in 2012? Michigan, however, deserves no such reward. Should anyone be forced to go to there in January or February? Push Michigan back to where it used to be -- in the early spring.

California, the Golden State know for its beautiful weather, can go any time -- except during times of mudslides, wildfires or earthquakes. Which, of course, means there is never an ideal time. So no California primary. Ever.

That still leaves Iowa in a quandary. Normally the state's caucuses start the process and historically they've been held eight days before New Hampshire -- though it will be just five days this year. But if we're readjusting the calendar so completely, I'd propose that Iowa's first-in-the-nation event be held around the time of the Iowa State Fair.

Republicans long have held a straw poll in August the year before the presidential election. Why not sanctify the state fair's central place in American life by scheduling the caucuses around this orgy of pork on a stick and deep-fried indulgences? If the caucuses were held at the state fair, maybe even more people would turn out to vote. It would beat the ice and snow of a January night.

Maybe this isn't perfect. Maybe there are flaws in this climate-controlled nomination schedule. If you have a better idea, send it along. We have nothing but space for your comments. And maybe the barons in Congress and the national party committees who are trying to build a better mousetrap will get some inspiration.

By the way, the weather looks a little brighter outside. Maybe it's not so bad here after all.

--Dan Balz

Posted at 2:30 PM ET on Dec 11, 2007  | Category:  Dan Balz's Take
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in | Digg This
Previous: The Ice Storm | Next: With Reporters Grounded, Obama and Clinton Hold Competing Conference Calls

Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Please email us to report offensive comments.

Dan, obviously you weren't in Iowa for the straw poll in August, or you have a short memory -- the heat index was 105 degrees!

Posted by: Yankeesfan1 | December 12, 2007 3:42 AM

i see babbling brooks is now poisoning The Trail with his woman-hating screeds. what a sicko.

Posted by: Spectator2 | December 11, 2007 11:19 PM

Hill and Obama still cash their senatorial paychecks, right? Nice work if you can get it, huh?

Posted by: TheDubb | December 11, 2007 6:25 PM

I say that the most honorable and climatologically temperate Old Line state of Maryland should go first, so that voters who don't pay attention will just vote for whoever we say they should.

Posted by: deaniac | December 11, 2007 5:04 PM

If this column discourages some reporters, candidates, and particularly the "D" list celebrities supporting the candidates to stay home everyone of us Hawkeyes will be elated. Thank you for doing the piece, Dan!

Posted by: rwk4 | December 11, 2007 4:52 PM

So, Clinton has the endorsement of Maya Angelou? Now, Maya Angelous is a former brothel madam, an associate of Malcom-X, the radical feminist who wrote "The white American man makes the white American woman..a kind of decoration", and recently said that 'all ethic are relative'. She sort of fits in with Clinton's whole world view - men are evil swine and feminist womyn can do no wrong and are empowered to make up right and wrong as they along. Fits right in with the self absorbed porno queens and Wall Street yuppies who also endorse and fund Clinton. God help us, but there are good and decent Democratic candidates for the Presidency, Clinton simply isn't one fo them.

Posted by: mibrooks27 | December 11, 2007 4:52 PM

Welcome to Iowa Dan! We're happy to have you here. You're welcome to come to my Obama House Party on Thursday. I'll buy you a hot chocolate.

Posted by: phil.james | December 11, 2007 4:52 PM

Mr. Balz,
Oh my God you are so worried about the C-O-L-D weather in Iowa and NH. There is no need to change the primary dates because according to that new Democratic Icon, Al Gore, the "Inconvenient Truth" of "Global Warming" will make NH and Iowa feel like Miami in a few short years. Man made Global warming is almost as much of a joke as your paper is trying to be objective.

Posted by: keith.krause | December 11, 2007 4:11 PM

Mr. Balz: You are clearly very bored.

Posted by: mmeyerdc | December 11, 2007 4:05 PM

I'm delighted to say I proposed the same thing at MyDD ( back on March 4. And while most of my reasons had to do with having the nominating process better empower the voters, part of my reasoning was about the season:

"My final reason is aesthetic. Can we get past this quadrennial tromping through the snows of Iowa and New Hampshire, and put those states on the primary calendar at times that show them to their best advantage? The **Field of Dreams** exchange, "Is this heaven?" "No, it's Iowa" sure wouldn't have made sense in January. And I can personally attest that New Hampshire is beautiful in September - though the primary should be in that window between the summer tourist season and the fall foliage season. Then, as the weather cools, we can move on to Nevada and South Carolina.

Needless to say, this is a total pipe dream. It would never happen.

But dammit, it *should.* "

Posted by: rt42 | December 11, 2007 3:59 PM



It is possible that Senator Clinton is the best candidate. However, even though many may like the policies that Senator Clinton proposes, they should also consider her record, just as Senator Clinton insists.
The last Clinton Administration, when faced with the fact that protection rackets where assaulting, torturing and murdering people with poison and radiation, chose to avoid its responsibilities to incarcerate the criminals and to protect the citizenry.
Instead, they made a deal with the criminal gang stalker protection rackets to leave them alone and to consequently abandon the citizenry.
Do we want a President who sells out the citizenry for votes?
Do we want a President who sends a "crime does pay" message to society?
Would you vote for a President who signed nonaggression deals with the KKKlan or the Nazi party? Gangs that torture with poison and radiation are much like the KKKlan and Nazi Party.
We do not need a sellout President. We need a principled leader President.
If you are one of the few who do not know what the above refers to, do a web search for "gang stalking" to see the tip of the dirtberg. Please do it before you decide to reply to my post. Here let me make it easy for you:

Posted by: avraamjack | December 11, 2007 3:55 PM

So Mr Balz, is that why you did not go to New Hampshire and instead went to South Carolina on Sunday. I think your piece on Oprah in South Carolina would have benefitted from a comparison of the Obama rallies in New Hampshire and South Carolina. WashPost readers would have certainly benefitted.

Posted by: xango | December 11, 2007 3:32 PM

We would actually all be better off if Dan Balz got stuck in Iowa. This is one of his typical blogs even when the weather is nice. His blogs rarely illuminate anything worthwhile for voters.

Posted by: peterdc | December 11, 2007 3:19 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.


© 2009 The Washington Post Company