The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

Clinton Reaches Out to Younger Voters


Hillary Clinton campaigns in New Hampshire. (Reuters).

By Anne E. Kornblut
MANCHESTER, N.H. -- Of the myriad concerns that emerged for Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's campaign from Thursday's caucus results in Iowa, perhaps none is more worrisome than the explosion of youth voter support for Sen. Barack Obama. Clinton has done little to explicitly appeal to young people over her last year of campaigning, banking on older, more reliable voters and especially focusing on middle-aged and elderly women. A standard riff in the Clinton stump speech involves the women aged 90 and older she often meets on the rope line.

Now for the pivot. On Saturday, Clinton made a last-minute addition to her schedule: a conversation with young undecided voters in New Hampshire. That's significant because the event eats into her preparation time before tonight's make-or-break debate. And it also indicates that the Clinton camp is beginning to fully digest the full extent of the demographic worries that arose for them in Iowa.

Posted at 10:11 AM ET on Jan 5, 2008
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: A Punchy McCain Mocks the Media | Next: In NH, Edwards Fights to Stay in the Mix


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Are those kids on stage her voting base?

Or is she going after the grand kid vote.

Or her fellow granny aged boomers?

Hillary is just a cunning little runt.


Posted by: palm50 | January 5, 2008 7:48 PM

We've seen those tactics already. Hillary's camp was sending out muslim emails, and then called Obama a dope dealer. She also called him a coward, naive, inexperienced. It only made her look desperate and nasty, she did anything she could. Just like Bush.

People didn't buy it, thankfully, as a society, we are moving past that. Many independents, and some Republican's even moved to vote for Obama.

Posted by: kiku | January 5, 2008 6:52 PM

Let 'em scream and attack. They only validate Obamas approach. And those who have supported Bush have no credibility with more than 70% of the electorate. The Republican evangelical/neocon axis has failed America. Their ideology fails, their policies fail, their screaming and yelling will fail. Their time is past and it failed. Quick, name the biggest failure of the last 25 years? The Republican Party.

Posted by: thebobbob | January 5, 2008 5:43 PM


I think part of determining electability is keeping a finger on the pulse of what conservatives are passing around on the internet. They won't lower the boom on Obama until after the primaries if he's the candidate but still some of the more hard core can't restrain themselves.

I just copied on one of those conservative emails that make the rounds, you know the type, and it was low key but damaging about Obamas's church and faith. Just a hint at the devastation to come.

I'm not much for content free flowery speeches but I recognize many people are taken by his speeches. But I really see a re-enactment of '72 here with anti-war McGovern getting trounced by Nixon Republicans with dirty tricks and law and order / national defense, etc.

They will do the same thing to Obama, but will be much uglier. Left wing Democrats criticize Hillary, but she is not vulnerable to national security like Obama is, and by the time the email whispering campaign attacks on Obama are done, we will be reliving 1972 all over again.

People really need to get realistic about Republican neocons and what they will do.

rd

Posted by: ralphdaugherty | January 5, 2008 5:11 PM

Her videogame ban's coming back to bite.

Posted by: benmasel | January 5, 2008 4:33 PM

from the article: "On Saturday, Clinton made a last-minute addition to her schedule: a conversation with young undecided voters in New Hampshire. That's significant because the event eats into her preparation time before tonight's make-or-break debate."

There's really no better preparation she can make than to talk to young undecided voters. Good for Hillary.

I don't mind at all this going beyond Feb. 5 before a winner is determined. Having two small states determine who our candidate is is a ridiculous concept, as someone was asking that candidates ashould drop out for "unity" after one freakin caucus. Gimme a break.

It's just the first two of several states yet to speak. None of these remaining Democratic candidates should drop out at this point until the people have determined who they want for President, ideally by the time most states have spoken.

rd

Posted by: ralphdaugherty | January 5, 2008 3:57 PM

If that pic is any indication, she's going after the wrong crowd.

Posted by: stoopidity | January 5, 2008 3:36 PM

LOL! For Slick's Ol Lady, they are ALL Younger Voters!

C'mon Chelsea, make it official, she SHOULD be a Granny!

Posted by: rat-the | January 5, 2008 2:46 PM

Democratic New Hampshire Primary -- Prediction Time!

Who do you predict will win the Democratic New Hampshire Primary?

http://www.youpolls.com/details.asp?pid=1446

.

Posted by: PollM | January 5, 2008 11:52 AM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company