Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

An Eventful Day at CPAC

Note: Please upgrade your Flash plug-in to view our enhanced content.

At an annual meeting of conservatives in Washington, D.C., Mitt Romney ended his campaign, and John McCain turned his attention to shoring up support among conservatives as he prepares for the general election campaign. The Post's Dan Balz provides analysis.

By washingtonpost.com Editors  |  February 8, 2008; 8:10 AM ET
Categories:  A_Blog , John McCain , Video Report  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Bush Signals Support for McCain
Next: Michigan's Missed Moment as Clinton-Obama Fight Continues

Comments

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba - The secrecy shrouding government files on terror suspects is bogging down the Pentagon's effort to hold trials at Guantanamo Bay, with defense attorneys accusing the government of withholding potential exculpatory evidence.

At pretrial hearings this week, attorneys for two al-Qaida suspects captured in Afghanistan said they need more access to interrogators, witnesses and records. Prosecutors objected, citing a need to protect the identities of U.S. service members and other security concerns.

The hearings did not resolve the disputes, which appear likely to further delay the launch of first U.S. war-crime tribunals since the World War II era. The first detainees were charged more than three years ago, but repeated legal challenges have kept any from going to trial.

"We're going to have to see how willing the judges are to interpret the rules so as to give defense counsel some kind of chance to actually defend their clients," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. William Kuebler, a defense attorney for detainee Omar Khadr. "That means litigating these discovery issues and that takes time."

Trials are scheduled to begin this spring for Khadr, who is accused of hurling a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier in 2002, and Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a former driver for Osama bin Laden who allegedly also delivered weapons for al-Qaida.

They are minor figures compared with the 15 "high-value" detainees - including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the alleged mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks - who are among those expected to face charges. Secrecy may be even a bigger issue in their trials.

The New York Times reported Saturday that military prosecutors are nearing the end of preparations for the "first sweeping case" against as many as six Guantanamo detainees suspected in the Sept. 11 plot - Mohammed likely among them.

The law authorizing the war-crimes tribunals allows the use of classified evidence, and prosecutors say they fulfill their obligation to share it with the other side. But some defense attorneys say the government uses too narrow an interpretation of what information is relevant and should be provided to the defense.

Classified evidence will likely play an increasingly central role as the government forges ahead with plans to prosecute about 80 of the roughly 275 men held at this isolated U.S. Navy base on suspicion of terrorism or links to the Taliban or al-Qaida.

A Pentagon spokesman, Navy Cmdr. Jeffrey Gordon, said the government's decisions to classify evidence often reflect a need to protect U.S. forces still fighting in Afghanistan.

"The hearings this week demonstrated some of the complexities involved in a new type of war against a new type of enemy," he said, while expressing optimism. "On balance, we're making progress and moving forward."

In Hamdan's case, his attorneys asked the military judge to provide them access to government employees who interrogated Hamdan after his capture in November 2001. One of his attorneys, Charles Swift, said the defense wants to determine whether Hamdan made any statements through coercion.

Hamdan's defense team said they have been provided with only partial, incriminating portions of his interrogation transcripts - an accusation that prosecutors denied.

"Every statement that he has made we have provided," said Army Col. Larry Morris, the chief prosecutor for the military tribunals.

In Khadr's case, Kuebler said the government has refused to put defense lawyers in touch with several eyewitnesses to the 2002 firefight in Afghanistan which Khadr, who was then 15, allegedly hurled a grenade that killed Army Sgt. 1st Class Christopher Speer.

At one of the hearings this week, the government inadvertently released a witness account that raised doubt over whether Khadr threw the grenade. Prosecutors later said they had planned to hand out a redacted version, but Kuebler said he believed the government meant to keep the witness account from the public.

"There's no openness about this process," he said.

The military commissions, as the tribunals are called, convicted one detainee - David Hicks of Australia - but it was through a plea bargain before his trial even began.

Posted by: jwholtkamp | February 9, 2008 4:02 PM | Report abuse

Holy Moley!!! Did anyone else see Ron Paul's speech yesterday!? He destroyed John McCain. He got the loudest cheers by far and completely pointed out the fact that McCain is NOT a conservative. Wow. Talk about a powerful speech. Two of my friends who were Obama supporters switched and are now going to vote for Dr. Paul. And that was just from hearing him speak once! No wonder that CNN and Fox News showed Romney's AND McCain's speeches, not to mention Bush, however they wouldn't even mention Ron Pauls name. Talk about scared! What are they so afraid of? haha. its obvious isn't it....

Posted by: archer.jesse | February 8, 2008 7:43 PM | Report abuse

Great campaign coming up. What settles for political discourse for Republicans? The Democrats are tax-raising surrender monkeys who will hand over America to Islamo-fascist terrorists! Watch for it on a TV near you. If they say it over and over and over, maybe America will ignore the fact that the Republicans have mis-led us into the sh*tcan.

Posted by: thebobbob | February 8, 2008 2:18 PM | Report abuse

Truly trenchant, enlightening analysis from one of the "Lions of the MSM", Dan Balz.

Of course, it would have been just a bit better if he'd have done his job and asked McCain a question he'd have trouble with:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=YRWRzZ_yPnk

Posted by: LonewackoDotCom | February 8, 2008 1:53 PM | Report abuse

Ahem, Cough-cough...

BOOOOOOO! BOOOOOOOOOO!

McPain, IF, you mean one letter of the diatribe you espoused, GET ON YOUR KNEES RIGHT THIS INSTANT,

And BEG Mitt Romney to be your Running Mate!

It would actually be a VERY Intelligent thing to do! ;~)

Posted by: rat-the | February 8, 2008 1:24 PM | Report abuse

I would have stayed in the race, officially, but given a speech indicating that McCain certainly seems to have garnered the nomination -- given McCain's age / health questions, 2nd place in the delegate count is not that bad -- Huckabee realizes that and will try to overtake Romney's delegate count now.

Posted by: JakeD | February 8, 2008 12:34 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company