Iowa Without Edwards
By Jon Cohen
Would Hillary Clinton have won Iowa if John Edwards had been forced out of the race? Howard Wolfson thinks so.
Wolfson, former director of communications for Clinton's presidential bid, suggested to ABC News that the New York senator would have prevailed in Iowa had Edwards been forced from the race before voting started in early January.
"Our voters and Edwards' voters were the same people," Wolfson told ABC. "They were older, pro-union. Not all, but maybe two-thirds of them would have been for us and we would have barely beaten Obama."
It is a pure hypothetical, of course, and the entire dynamics of the contest would have been different without Edwards. But the public data do not bolster the notion that Clinton would have won.
In the networks' Iowa entrance poll, 43 percent of those who went to a caucus to support Edwards said Obama was their second choice, far fewer, 24 percent said they would support Clinton if their top choice did not garner enough votes at that location. The remainder of Edwards' backers said they would be uncommitted under such a scenario, offered no second choice or said they preferred someone else.
Posted at 11:28 AM ET on Aug 11, 2008
Share This: Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: McCain: NATO Should Address "Russian Aggression" | Next: McCain Campaigns with Ridge as VP Speculation Intensifies
Please email us to report offensive comments.
Posted by: JakeD | August 11, 2008 8:53 PM
Posted by: Lynne | August 11, 2008 8:44 PM
Posted by: JakeD | August 11, 2008 7:58 PM
Posted by: Arzoff | August 11, 2008 7:45 PM
Posted by: JakeD | August 11, 2008 7:40 PM
Posted by: danielhancock | August 11, 2008 7:22 PM
Posted by: JakeD | August 11, 2008 7:12 PM
Posted by: JakeD | August 11, 2008 7:08 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.