The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

Washington Life

The New Presidential Limo: 'A Rolling Tank with Windows'


By Garance Franke-Ruta
On Wednesday, pictures of a massive armored Caddy, reported to be the new presidential limo, leaked around the world. Now, Agence France-Presse confirms that a new GM-manufactured presidential limo -- described in an earlier CNN report, above, as "a rolling tank with windows" -- will debut in the Inaugural parade on Jan. 20.

Its nickname: "the Beast."

From the AFP report:

Cadillac spokesman David Caldwell promises that the finished product will combine form with function.

"It's really a new design," Mr Caldwell told AFP.

"It's a fresh, more modern, more expressive, a little bit more vibrant if you will, but it still is faithful to that tradition of presidential vehicles ... it's long and it's black."

The interior will include some of the plush detailing offered to regular Cadillac customers and the body has been built to be more "upright" and provide better visibility, Mr Caldwell said.

But any of the technical details are top-secret, he said, adding, "we're not even allowed to open the doors".

The vehicle is thought to have bulletproof glass, a heavily armoured body, run-flat tyres and a completely sealed interior to protect against a chemical attack.

Official photos of the behemoth are expected to be released early next week.

Posted at 2:27 PM ET on Jan 10, 2009  | Category:  Washington Life
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: Obama Says Stimulus Will Redound to Private Sector | Next: Obama Gets a Half-Smoke at Ben's Chili Bowl


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Has anyone contemplated the consequences if Obama is found to be ineligible? Setting aside the potential for blackmail, what if that is made public AFTER January 20th? Why wouldn't HE want this resolved sooner rather than later?

Posted by: JakeD | January 12, 2009 2:21 PM


PLEA TO OBAMA: CANCEL RISKY, RECKLESS 'SITTING DUCK' TRAIN STUNT

• What happened to Homeland Security warnings of "heightened risk" during Presidential transition?

• How about the late November FBI warning about possible Northeast train station attacks?

• "Amtrak Joe" Biden's longstanding warnings about security flaws along the Amtrak Northeast corridor -- why isn't he waving this whistle stop tour to a halt?

PREVENT A TRAGEDY. READ THIS LINK AND MAKE IT VIRAL. THIS IS NOT AN OVER-REACTION. PLEASE DO IT NOW:


http://my.nowpublic.com/world/plea-obama-cancel-risky-reckless-sitting-duck-train-stunt

OR (if link is corrupted):

http://My.NowPublic.com/scrivener

Posted by: scrivener50 | January 12, 2009 2:13 PM

Posted by: JakeD | January 12, 2009 2:13 PM

If you haven't read the Keyes lawsuit, I suggest you do so. If you have, you would know there's more than a couple different arguments. How would you explain (hypothetically, of course) Obama not being Constitutionally disqualified if he was born in what is now Kenya to an underage mother?

Posted by: JakeD | January 12, 2009 10:04 AM

No. You asked for one shred though. Have you read the Keyes lawsuit?

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 11:28 PM

So you're hanging this whole thing on a single mistranslation that is corrected within the source conversation?

Posted by: SeanC1 | January 11, 2009 10:50 PM

That goes to the weight of the evidence. Sorry, but that still counts as a "shred". I don't have to explain the reasons why.

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 9:54 PM

"Well, okay, but one "shred" of evidence would be Obama's paternal grandmother's statement that she was present (in what is now Kenya) for his birth."

That's a snippet from a phone conversation where one of two translators misunderstands the question, and later, upon finally realizing what is being asked, both say he was born in Hawaii. The phrase used was "son of this village", which is a Kenyan idiom not indicative of him actually being born there.

So, again, some evidence? Explanation for how they got to Kenya? Why they went? Why there's a phony birth announcement in the Honolulu Advertiser? Why they've been covering it up since 1961? How these low-income nobodies even perpetrated this hoax (how'd they get him back into the country?)? Why every politician and government agency, even those who are ideologically and politically his opponents and who would have no reason to cover for him, are doing so?

Posted by: SeanC1 | January 11, 2009 9:18 PM

Of course, all this talk about limos and helicopters puts the horse before the cart. Alan Keyes (and others) will continue to file suits to challenge pResident Evil Obama. The proper remedy for such suitors would be a Quo Warranto, which is unique among writs, in that the normal rules of pleading are reversed, the "relator" (one bringing suit) only has to make a "prima facia" case, and the "respondant" (Obama) has to prove full qualification for office! There are only 2 possible answers to a Quo Warranto writ: Disclaim (say he never had the job, title, franchise, etc.) or Justify (offer proof).

I believe that Marbury v. Madison was a Quo Warranto writ as well.

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 6:32 PM

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 4:35 PM

(from the "Obama Gets a Half-Smoke at Ben's Chili Bowl" thread):

KayinMaine:

So, does that mean 80% or 100% of all Americans wouldn't eat with GWB?

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 4:27 PM

(from the Colin Powell thread):

P.S. to KayinMaine:

If there were similar questions of the Republican's qualifications -- and he had "won" -- I would be making the same exact argument but suspect you would be singing a different tune.

For instance, if the "entire political establishment" thought it was just fine to let Arnold Schwarzenegger become President short of a formal Constitutional Amendment, I would object to that as well. Would you?

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 4:23 PM

I don't want to physically hurt KayinMaine, either, but I must have scared her away because she hasn't answered any of the questions I posed to her.

Posted by: JakeD | January 11, 2009 4:13 PM

KayinMaine:

I don't want to physically hurt Obama. The limo, and a new fleet of helicopters, were ordered long before he was elected. Next canard?

Posted by: JakeD | January 10, 2009 8:03 PM

Barack Obama has to have a safe limo thanks to all the neck drooling knuckle dragging neocons, such as, JakeD, who will find ways to hurt Barack. Isn't that right, JakeD? We can't trust you, now can we?

Posted by: KayInMaine | January 10, 2009 6:40 PM

LOL! :-D

All O'Bomba needed, was a Vice-President like Dubya had, and he would not have had to worry!

NOBODY, wanted to wake-up to PRESIDENT Darth Cheney! ;~)

Posted by: SAINT---The | January 10, 2009 5:34 PM

pResident Evil Obama will not be (legally) sworn in on January 20, 2009.

Posted by: JakeD | January 10, 2009 2:30 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company