The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

Cabinet

Specter Announces a Vote for Holder


Sen. Arlen Specter concludes his news conference on Capitol Hill after saying he would support the nomination of Attorney General-designate Eric Holder. (Susan Walsh/Associated Press)

By Carrie Johnson
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), ranking member on the Judiciary Committee, announced this afternoon that he would vote for Attorney General nominee Eric Holder Jr. after weeks in which the lawmaker advocated for intense vetting of Holder's credentials.

Specter's remarks in the Senate Press Gallery this afternoon come a day before the judiciary panel is scheduled to vote on Holder's nomination, which was delayed for a week at the request of GOP lawmakers on the committee. Specter, who is preparing for what could be a tough Republican primary fight in his home state, had raised questions about Holder's role in a pair of controversial clemency decisions during the Clinton Administration. The lawmaker sent dozens of written questions to Holder, 58, and even met with him privately late last week.

Republican leaders had signaled that Holder's bid to become the first African American to lead the nation's largest law enforcement agency would meet with resistance, confounding Democratic supporters who noted that Holder had broad experience as a former judge, U.S. attorney and second in command at the Justice Department during the Clinton era.

Holder, a partner at the Washington law firm Covington & Burling, already had won support from Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Sen. Mel Martinez (R-Fla.). He has quietly been assembling senior staff members at the Justice Department, which had been demoralized by politicized hiring scandals during the Bush Administration. The department will play a critical role in determining the status of detainees at the U.S. military base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and in developing new legal guidance on interrogation policy, among other issues.

Key nominees for other Justice posts, including deputy attorney general nominee David Ogden, national security division nominee David Kris, and solicitor general nominee Elena Kagan, had been on hold while the Judiciary Committee deliberated the Holder selection.

Today's support from Specter could ease the path for those nominations and could prompt Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.) to soon schedule hearings for those slots, which require approval by the full Senate.

Posted at 3:24 PM ET on Jan 27, 2009  | Category:  Cabinet
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: E-Mail System Running Again at the White House | Next: Obama Meets with Republicans on the Hill


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Sen. Specter:

Please ask Mr. Holder about the nexus between pervasive government spying on the public and on journalists...

... and the Stasi-like nationwide vigilante network that is making a mockery of our judicial system:

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-targets-terrorizes-u-s-citizens

OR (if link is disabled):

http://My.NowPublic.com/scrivener

Posted by: scrivener50 | January 27, 2009 9:15 PM

No this means that Pat Toomey is running for Governor in Pennsylvania in 2010 instead of running against Specter, so he does not have to put on this fake BS to appease the Rick Santorum wing of the Pennsylvania GOP. Arlen knows better, he met with Holder Friday to tell him he would support him.

Posted by: kitibo | January 27, 2009 7:47 PM

Who paid Specter and how much? If this isn't a stab in the back to his Republican supporters, I don't know what is. Please change your party affiliation. Then, at least we can expect the sucker punch.

Posted by: dnha | January 27, 2009 5:23 PM

So, this doesn't mean, does it, that Holder has agreed to never investigate, prosecute, or in any other way implicate Republicans, in any wrongdoings performed by the previous Justice Dept. officials?
This doesn't mean, does it, that Eric Holder has agreed to follow the "political" directions of the Republican Party?

Posted by: cms1 | January 27, 2009 4:17 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company