The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

National Security

As Times Change, So Do Iraq War Statements

By Michael D. Shear
President Obama's announcement of a deadline for withdrawing combat troops from Iraq recalled one of the most hotly-debated issues of the presidential campaign: whether a date-certain for withdrawal was tantamount to giving up.

It also provided some interesting flip-flops.

Take, for example, the statement today by House Minority Leader John Boehner, who praised Obama's new policy.

"The plan put forward by President Obama continues our strategy of bringing troops home from Iraq as they succeed in stabilizing the country," he said in a statement. "I believe he has outlined a responsible approach that retains maximum flexibility to reconsider troop levels and to respond to changes in the security environment should circumstances on the ground warrant."

But that's very different from what Boehner said in 2007, when the Iraq war was going badly and Democratic lawmakers were pushing for a resolution that would call for an end date to the war.

On March 16, 2007, Boehner said on the floor of the House: "Setting timelines is no different than handing the enemy our war plan itself. It serves as a road map for the terrorists to plot maneuvers against American men and women in uniform. Micromanaging the war from [the] Capitol is, by any standard or definition, a recipe for disaster."

Boehner spokeswoman Antonia Ferrier disputes that Boehner's statements represent a flip flop. She said the improved security situation in Iraq justifies the change. And she noted that the GOP opposition to a timeline in 2007 was rooted in their belief that politicians were dictating to the military commanders on the ground.

"Two years ago, those decisions were being pushed by politicians in Washington and not by the generals on the ground," she said. "Now, we're in a situation where the president has been listening to our generals who have said this draw down of troops is realistic and that that our military will have the flexibility it needs if the security situation deteriorates."

She continued: "Iraq today is so much different than it was two years ago; there have been successful elections, violence is dramatically down, and the country is starting to function. And that happened because of a successful surge strategy that many of these very same
Congressional Democrats opposed from the outset."

The president is not immune to a bit of flip-flopping himself.

In 2007, Obama said of then-President Bush's new surge policy in Iraq: "I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse."

He softened that late in the campaign, saying it had, in fact, succeeded beyond what anyone could have predicted. In today's speech at Camp Lejeune, he said that "Thanks in great measure to your service and sacrifice and your family's sacrifices, the situation in Iraq has improved. Violence has been reduced substantially from the horrific sectarian killing of 2006 and 2007."

Posted at 5:50 PM ET on Feb 27, 2009  | Category:  National Security
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: Liberal PAC Plans New Campaign Against Incumbent Dems | Next: Gibbs: HHS Secretary 'Possible' by Next Thursday


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



For the record, the other thread was about difficulties trapping actual raccoons -- no racist slur intended -- raccoons are attracted by the smell of eggs. That's just a fact.

Posted by: JakeD | February 28, 2009 2:30 PM

When will the Republicans, including McCain, admit that the constant pressure from Democrats over the last few years to set an end date for the Iraq war has been materially responsible for the Bush administration's eventual move in that direction. The pressure to set an end date was always criticized as an example of disloyalty to this country. Instead, it was a major aid to saving us.

Posted by: swhite3 | February 28, 2009 9:07 AM

Btw: If you are wondering what kind of people post here just read below
-------
Raccoons love raw eggs too. Was this one caught in the Oval Office? Instead of the Easter Egg roll, are they going to use watermelons this year?

Posted by: JakeD | February 25, 2009 4:40 PM

Posted by: JRM2 | February 27, 2009 7:36 PM

Now that Obama has won the war in Iraq in a month that the Republicans couldn't win in 7 years he can go on to winning the war in Afghanistan.

Posted by: JRM2 | February 27, 2009 7:33 PM

For the record, I served my country in Army Signal Corps during the Korean War.

Posted by: JakeD | February 27, 2009 6:58 PM

Boehner's flip flop is more newsworthy than Obama's?! Bottom line, I'm glad that 50,000 troops are staying.

Posted by: JakeD | February 27, 2009 6:22 PM

---------------------------------------

JakeD-
Why aren't you over there with them?

Posted by: rooster54 | February 27, 2009 6:35 PM

I almost choked on my lunch when I read Boehner agreed with Obama

Posted by: JRM2 | February 27, 2009 6:25 PM

Boehner's flip flop is more newsworthy than Obama's?! Bottom line, I'm glad that 50,000 troops are staying.

Posted by: JakeD | February 27, 2009 6:22 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company