In Supreme Court Fight, Code Words Abound
By Ben Pershing
Supreme Court campaigns are unlike most others in politics, in that nominees usually make a point of not saying what they really believe, and are applauded for it.
So one day after pro-abortion rights groups made it clear they had "concerns" about Sonia Sotomayor's views, the White House moved to reassure them -- sort of -- that she would be on the right side of the debate from their perspective. Of course, Sotomayor's public record on the issue is thin, and she and President Obama supposedly never discussed abortion. So Robert Gibbs didn't come right out and say yesterday that she supported Roe v. Wade. Instead the press secretary spoke of Obama being "comfortable with her interpretation of the Constitution." And we all know what that means, right? As Eric Idle once put it so eloquently, "a nod's as good as a wink to a blind bat."
Code words abound this morning, and so the delicate discussion of Sotomayor's "temperament" continues. She has "a blunt and even testy side," according to the New York Times, traits that surely no one on the Senate Judiciary Committee possesses. Her supporters wonder whether her "assertiveness" and "aggressiveness" would be an issue at all if she were a man. Casting those code words aside, her detractors go further, tagging her as "nasty," "angry" and a "terror on the bench." As for another label lobbed against Sotomayor -- "racist" -- John Cornyn is urging his party not to use it. (On a related note, Cornyn's home state of Texas has a large Hispanic population. But according to an interesting new item on FiveThirtyEight, the data shows "Hispanics were not a key component in Obama's win." Read the whole thing, as they say.)
Continue reading at Political Browser »
Posted at 8:10 AM ET on May 29, 2009
Share This: Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: POTUS Events: Cyber Security | Next: Court Watch: The Princeton Years, PRLDEF, and Questions About Temperament
Please email us to report offensive comments.
Posted by: Victoria5 | May 30, 2009 3:52 AM
Posted by: scrivener50 | May 29, 2009 3:09 PM
Posted by: jeffgilbert1 | May 29, 2009 2:13 PM
Posted by: scrivener50 | May 29, 2009 12:39 PM
Posted by: Cryos | May 29, 2009 11:58 AM
Posted by: james48 | May 29, 2009 11:11 AM
Posted by: usadblake | May 29, 2009 10:39 AM
Posted by: eagleEd | May 29, 2009 10:33 AM
Posted by: parkerfl1 | May 29, 2009 9:49 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.