Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Social Web Mobilizes for - and Against - Sotomayor

By Jose Antonio Vargas
Three weeks before David Souter announced his retirement from the Supreme Court -- and long before President Obama picked a federal judge from New York to replace him -- Mario Christian Lozada created the first Facebook group in support of Sonia Sotomayor.

The group "Sonia Sotomayor for U.S. Supreme Court Justice" grew slowly, from 12 to 30 then 50 members, mostly friends and acquaintances of Lozada, a second-year law student at Boston College. But it grew at a rate of about 300 to 500 a day after May 26, the day Obama introduced Sotomayor in the White House East Room.

As of 7 a.m. Monday, just hours before the confirmation hearing began on the country's 111th justice, the group listed 9,855 members. The goal was articulated in a comment posted by a member late Friday afternoon: "Help us fight the right wing attacks by showing that you stand behind Judge Sotomayor." The group is just one of 63 Facebook groups and fan pages devoted to Sotomayor. Most of the groups, such as "Sonia Sotomayor is my homegirl," sprang up to support the 55-year-old Puerto Rican from the Bronx -- though others, such as "Stop Sonia Sotomayor," stand against her.

"In many ways, the whole procedure of nominating someone to the Supreme Court -- the Supreme Court itself, really -- is this insular thing. Everyday people don't really have a say about it. But by forming the Facebook group, I feel like I have a voice," said Lozada, 23, in a phone interview. After Obama was elected president, Lozada figured that the former senator from Illinois would get to fill at least one Supreme Court vacancy. Hence the early online drumming for Sotomayor. "In the past, unless you're a law student, or some sort of legal geek, you know so little about the Supreme Court. But now people are going online to figure out what her nomination means for them," he said.

There are, in fact, three layers to this summer's Supreme Court nominating debate and hearings, the first to be held in the socially connected age of Facebook, YouTube and Twitter.

(Twitter, it's worth recalling, didn't even exist in 2005, when Harriet Miers, John Roberts and Samuel Alito were all nominated to the highest court. Back in those pre-hashtag, pre-mash-up days, the blogosphere -- and especially conservative blogs -- played the major role. Just ask Miers.)

First, there's the drama that will unfold within the confines of the Hart Senate Office Building, starring Sotomayor and the 19 members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Then there's the planned wall-to-wall mainstream media coverage, from news articles to a parade of talking heads, feeding off each other.

Reacting to those two traditional sets of actors is the uncontrollable social Web, where the online masses are engaging with the nominating process in novel ways. Within seconds of the May 26 Sotomayor announcement, the online left and online right began to try to define her. For a few days in late May, searching for "Sonia Sotomayor" and "Supreme Court Justice" on Google led viewers to a Google ad purchased by the Heritage Foundation, a D.C.-based conservative group. Now, searching for "Sonia Sotomayor" on Google pulls up two Google ads -- one from America's Voice, which is calling for immigration reform, the other from dLife: For Your Diabetes Life!, a virtual hub for diabetics. Sotomayor was diagnosed with Type 1 diabetes at age eight.

"She is the first nominee for the Supreme Court in the age of new social media," notes Don Tellock, a former assistant attorney general for the state of New York who is now a partner at Schiff Hardin, specializing in information/data security and technology cases. "Everything she's written, everything she's said, anything that's out there, people online are looking into."

Indeed, thanks to the curiosity on display on various blogs and social networking sites, Sotomayor has undergone a kind of secondary online vetting process. Searches for "Sotomayor" on Google were up 2250 percent within the first week of her nomination, according to a Google spokesperson. In the past month, the top Sotomayor-related searches included "Sotomayor firefighters," referring to the high-profile Supreme Court case that involved firefighters who sued the city of New Haven for discrimination. On Wikipedia, the anyone-can-edit encyclopedia, the two articles featuring Sotomayor -- the
main Sonia Sotomayor article is separate from the Sonia Sotomayor Supreme Court nominationarticle -- have been edited hundreds of times in the past few weeks as the contest to define her has heated up.

But since the confirmation of Supreme Court justices is up to the U.S. Senate, it's unclear just what impact, if any, all this online activity will have. For the past few weeks, political analysts and legal experts have predicted that Sotomayor's confirmation as the first Hispanic justice -- and the third woman on the highest court -- is nearly guaranteed.

"Yes, at the end of the day, the Senate decides on whether or not she's confirmed. And, yes, the press is still playing a role in framing how Sotomayor is viewed. But that's changing," said Clay Shirky, a social Web expert and author of "Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations." Like many others, Shirky first heard about Sotomayor's nomination on Twitter, after a few of the people that he's following on the micro-blogging site began tweeting about it.

"A few years ago, when someone is nominated to the Supreme Court, a political clock started running. The politicians form their talking points. The press tries to frame the nominee and reporters compete to get to the mountaintop to try to define the nominee," Shirky added. "But what's interesting now is that we're getting, I think, a real political plurality. People are using Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and other social networks to discuss Sotomayor and establish their own opinions."

And just in case members of the Senate are not on Twitter, they are using new technologies to send their opinions to the decision makers in a fashion they have become used to.

District resident Mike Panetta created a fan page in support of Sotomayor the day Obama introduced her, a page which now has 24,100 fans. More importantly to Panetta, the page has a Take Action tab to allow Sotomayor's supporters to send an e-mail urging "a quick 'up-or-down' vote ... BEFORE the August recess" to their U.S. Senators directly from Facebook by filling out a form.

"Senators are moved by constituents writing to their offices about particular issues. So it's important that it's not just a fan page or a group. You have to take action," said Panetta, who works at Grassroots Enterprise, an online strategy firm. "Since I live in D.C. and don't have a specific senator to lobby, I'm trying to mobilize people in other states."

This is one in a series of online columns on our growing "clickocracy," in which we are one nation under Google, with e-mail and video for all. Please send suggestions, comments and tips to

By Web Politics Editor  |  July 13, 2009; 11:00 AM ET
Categories:  The Clickocracy  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Obama Selects Alabama Doctor as Surgeon General
Next: Hearing Room Clashes Could Alter Political Environment


Today was a great first day for Sotomayor. She is prepared... well prepared and solid as a rock. No meltdown possible.

See my take on her youtube P1915-- Sotomayor "An American Story."

Posted by: Victoria5 | July 14, 2009 1:17 AM | Report abuse

Kelly14 wrote, "Lies and innuendo, punctuated with t & a (Palin)...."

Now if I could just figure out how Tostitos and Anchovies can serve as punctuation, I would understand your comment ;)

Posted by: douglaslbarber | July 13, 2009 5:46 PM | Report abuse

The Senate in general, and the Judiciary Committee in particular, would be greatly improved if those windbags were limited to 140 characters per speech.

The rising oceans might start to recede, the broiling earth to cool, etc.

Posted by: douglaslbarber | July 13, 2009 5:41 PM | Report abuse

What's to mobilize about on the Republican side of the equation? Their message is always the same these days: "BOO!"

Lies and innuendo, punctuated with t & a (Palin), it's what's for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

What a show!

Posted by: Kelly14 | July 13, 2009 5:28 PM | Report abuse

Hey US Senate Stop Pandering To LA RAZ and
the Hispanic Voters and LARAZ Bigot Judges
Like Sotomayor and Quit Begin Comrade
Leader Marxist Barack Hussein Obama's
Yes Man Roll Over Rubber Stamps! Just Say
NO To Sotomayor Nomination as a US Supreme
Court Justice For Life! No WAY Sotomayor!

Posted by: sandy5274 | July 13, 2009 1:01 PM | Report abuse

Presente Action -- with the support of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee -- is airing Spanish-language ads in key congressional districts in Florida, holding Republicans accountable for racist remarks toward Sotomayor. You can chip in to keep the ads on the air at: Every 100 people who give $25 will keep the ads on the air another day. Let's show Republicans that racism has consequences.

Posted by: ashleighcrocker | July 13, 2009 12:38 PM | Report abuse

The republicans would do themselves a favor by not standing in the way of this nomination. There is a related post at

Posted by: carlyt | July 13, 2009 11:57 AM | Report abuse

Great liveblogging of Sotomayor hearings by DC's Head of State:


"10:40 Cliffhanger #1: Will Sessions be able to contain himself (one Twitterer just referred to him as the "angry leprechan")beyond his usual pressure-cooker outrage.

So far, level of conservative attack is dialed to a semi-contained notch 3 (of 5).

Hatch is trying to use Janice Brown, Estrada as stalking horses. Note that he said little about Soto's actual record--yet carefully laid in the premise that work on the SC is different than on the 2nd Circuit--a trope to be used later, to attempt to negate the fact that her record is an unbiased one.

Also note that when he referred to the much-to-be-heard-and-distorted concept of "empathy", he labelled it "personal empathy."

Let's get it clear from the start: Empathy is not sympathy. It is the ability to stand in the shoes of another, and see the world through another's eyes, from another's perspective.

Empathy is an inherant part of the law. The ability to comprehend Mens Rea, for example--state of mind--the fundamental concept of criminal law--depends upon the ability to stand in the shoes of another--to attempt to apprehend their world--quite literally, their state of mind."

Posted by: caraprado1 | July 13, 2009 11:24 AM | Report abuse

Don’t miss “The Political Chick” tonight live at 10 PM on with host Lisa Chase. Lisa will discuss the facts and analyze various topics pertaining to the national and international political climate. Lisa is an active stock trader, who helps individuals navigate through the plethora of information regarding the economy, immigration, national security, education and day-to-day issues affected by politics, such as real estate and finance. Tune in or call in!
Monday 10-11 PM EST
Call 877-CHAT-212!

Posted by: ChatAboutIt | July 13, 2009 11:07 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company