The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

National Security

At VFW Event, Obama Praises Veterans, Defends Afghanistan Strategy

Updated 2:12 p.m.
By Michael D. Shear
PHOENIX, Aug. 17 -- President Obama said Monday that fierce fighting rages on in Afghanistan, but he defended the administration's new approach to the conflict there, calling it a "war of necessity."

Speaking to the annual gathering of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, Obama praised the American troops in Afghanistan who are helping to secure the country ahead of elections there this week.

"As I said when I announced this strategy, there will be more difficult days ahead," Obama said. "The insurgency in Afghanistan didn't just happen overnight. And we won't defeat it overnight. This will not be quick. This will not be easy."

In his speech to about 5,500 people at the convention center here, the president paid homage to the nation's veterans, and he promised that his efforts to overhaul the nation's health-care system will not affect the benefits they receive from the government.

Continue reading »

For a full transcript of Obama's remarks, click here.

Posted at 1:29 PM ET on Aug 17, 2009  | Category:  National Security
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: Obama Makes Explicit His Objection to DOMA | Next: Rahm Emanuel Reads to Small Children, Ad Libbing All the Way


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



Obama blasts misspending on 'exotic' defense projects

now if this isn't the pot calling the kettle black.....OMG..so leftwing nutcase will think I just made a racist remark!

Posted by: JWx2 | August 18, 2009 5:42 AM

It is important that the UK continue to support and expand its armed forces over this coming decade. As an American, I view the UK as a our most important ally and one that must be able to support, independently if required, action around the globe. Furthermore, Europe requires a miltary power in order to afford it importance at the table of the world powers and the UK is the only country that has the capabilities to achieve this goal. Lastly, the ability to undertake independent actions is critical to the UK's world role. I would like to think that the US will come to the aid of its allies, but this is a foolish thought, with that in mind I believe that the UK must continue to make the investments in its military capabilities, in fact grow them from where they are today. Britian has been a force for good longer than most countries and needs to continue that role.

Thanks.
Claudia
Famous Philanthropists

Posted by: lpopo85 | August 18, 2009 3:59 AM

The irony of the armed protesters is that they are making an excellent case for Obama defending their rights. Under Bush such public presidential events were highly controlled and you can bet that Cheney would have rounded up anyone with a gun and shipped them to Gitmo under terror provisions without even a stop at the secret court. And that Rush would have defended him. I love America.

Posted by: MstrQ | August 17, 2009 10:41 PM

Interesting that Obama found time to sneak in a health care plug - in John McCain's hometown, no less...

http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: parkerfl1 | August 17, 2009 4:14 PM

Too bad baby-Bush took his eye off the ball and had his neo-con wet dream in Iraq. Yup! We sure showed those Iraqi's!

That trillion dollars given away to his steroid-pumped, wife-swapping evangelical mercenaries from Blackwater, sure would've helped the economy now, huh?

At last, some sanity in foreign policy. You just can't trust Republicans.

Posted by: thebobbob | August 17, 2009 2:16 PM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.



 
 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company