The Trail: A Daily Diary of Campaign 2008

Archives

Video Report

Obama Statement on European Missile Defense

Note: Please upgrade your Flash plug-in to view our enhanced content.
President Obama issued a statement Thursday updating the United States' missile defense strategies. Michael D. Shear, Ann Scott Tyson and Debbi Wilgoren have the full story here, and Obama's complete remarks are below.
Remarks by President Obama on strengthening missile defense in Europe

Good morning. As Commander-in-Chief, I'm committed to doing everything in my power to advance our national security. And that includes strengthening our defenses against any and all threats to our people, our troops, and our friends and allies around the world.

One of those threats is the danger posed by ballistic missiles. As I said during the campaign, President Bush was right that Iran's ballistic missile program poses a significant threat. And that's why I'm committed to deploying strong missile defense systems which are adaptable to the threats of the 21st century.

The best way to responsibly advance our security and the security of our allies is to deploy a missile defense system that best responds to the threats that we face and that utilizes technology that is both proven and cost-effective.

In keeping with that commitment, and a congressionally mandated review, I ordered a comprehensive assessment of our missile defense program in Europe. And after an extensive process, I have approved the unanimous recommendations of my Secretary of Defense and my Joint Chiefs of Staff to strengthen America's defenses against ballistic missile attack.

This new approach will provide capabilities sooner, build on proven systems, and offer greater defenses against the threat of missile attack than the 2007 European missile defense program.

This decision was guided by two principal factors. First, we have updated our intelligence assessment of Iran's missile programs, which emphasizes the threat posed by Iran's short- and medium-range missiles, which are capable of reaching Europe. There's no substitute for Iran complying with its international obligations regarding its nuclear program, and we, along with our allies and partners, will continue to pursue strong diplomacy to ensure that Iran lives up to these international obligations. But this new ballistic missile defense program will best address the threat posed by Iran's ongoing ballistic missile defense program.

Second, we have made specific and proven advances in our missile defense technology, particularly with regard to land- and sea-based interceptors and the sensors that support them. Our new approach will, therefore, deploy technologies that are proven and cost-effective and that counter the current threat, and do so sooner than the previous program. Because our approach will be phased and adaptive, we will retain the flexibility to adjust and enhance our defenses as the threat and technology continue to evolve.

To put it simply, our new missile defense architecture in Europe will provide stronger, smarter, and swifter defenses of American forces and America's allies. It is more comprehensive than the previous program; it deploys capabilities that are proven and cost-effective; and it sustains and builds upon our commitment to protect the U.S. homeland against long-range ballistic missile threats; and it ensures and enhances the protection of all our NATO allies.

This approach is also consistent with NATO missile -- NATO's missile defense efforts and provides opportunities for enhanced international collaboration going forward. We will continue to work cooperatively with our close friends and allies, the Czech Republic and Poland, who had agreed to host elements of the previous program. I've spoken to the Prime Ministers of both the Czech Republic and Poland about this decision and reaffirmed our deep and close ties. Together we are committed to a broad range of cooperative efforts to strengthen our collective defense, and we are bound by the solemn commitment of NATO's Article V that an attack on one is an attack on all.

We've also repeatedly made clear to Russia that its concerns about our previous missile defense programs were entirely unfounded. Our clear and consistent focus has been the threat posed by Iran's ballistic missile program, and that continues to be our focus and the basis of the program that we're announcing today.

In confronting that threat, we welcome Russians' cooperation to bring its missile defense capabilities into a broader defense of our common strategic interests, even as we continue to -- we continue our shared efforts to end Iran's illicit nuclear program.

Going forward, my administration will continue to consult closely with Congress and with our allies as we deploy this system, and we will rigorously evaluate both the threat posed by ballistic missiles and the technology that we are developing to counter it.

I'm confident that with the steps we've taken today, we have strengthened America's national security and enhanced our capacity to confront 21st century threats.

Thank you very much, everybody.

Posted at 10:56 AM ET on Sep 17, 2009  | Category:  Video Report
Share This: Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Tag in Del.icio.us | Digg This
Previous: A True Compromise, for Better or Worse | Next: Health Ad Spending Set to Top $100M


Add 44 to Your Site
Be the first to know when there's a new installment of The Trail. This widget is easy to add to your Web site, and it will update every time there's a new entry on The Trail.
Get This Widget >>


Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



SPACE-BASED MICROWAVE/LASER 'DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS' MAKE GROUND-BASED SYSTEMS OBSOLETE?

Could the real story be that satellite-based microwave and laser directed energy weapons make land-based anti-missile systems obsolete...

...but a spoon-fed mainstream media has yet to ask the Pentagon or the White House about reports of the deployment of such weaponry -- against our military enemies as well as against unjustly "targeted" American citizens?

http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america
http://nowpublic.com/world/zap-have-you-been-targeted-directed-energy-weapon-victims-organized-gang-stalking-say-its-happening-usa

Posted by: scrivener50 | September 17, 2009 3:17 PM

"Barack Hussein Obama-The democRAT's latest surrender monkey to live in the White House!

Posted by: cschotta1 | September 17, 2009 1:24 PM"
----
He's taking the advice of his military advisors unlike Bush.

And, nah, there is no racism coming from conservatives at all.

Posted by: JRM2 | September 17, 2009 3:09 PM

What is is like now, the THIRD top-level Al Qaeda or Taliban leader killed in about one month?

Posted by: JRM2 | September 17, 2009 3:07 PM

Your headlines make bias and stupid seem trivial. This particular missle strategy was introduced to President Bush by the DoD and Intelligence community. It was proper, logical, and considered an excellent idea by these experts. President Bush agreed and so did Congress. Remember those days when Congress was intelligent and wanted to do good things on their individual merit?

As Secretary Gates said so elequently today, the situation has changed and it is now not as vital or important and the current advice is to abandon it. This is simple evolution folks. The world is constantly changing.

The country fully acknowledges your zeal to discredit things done in previous administrations. Just stop your pomposity and arragance. You really have nothing to show for it other than your consistant blaming of others.

Prove yourself on your own merits, for the good of our citizens and integrity of our country.

Posted by: mark_mcgovern | September 17, 2009 2:42 PM

Your headlines make bias and stupid seem trivial. This particular missle strategy was introduced to President Bush by the DoD and Intelligence community. It was proper, logical, and considered an excellent idea by these experts. President Bush agreed and so did Congress. Remember those days when Congress was intelligent and wanted to do good things on their individual merit?

As Secretary Gates said so elequently today, the situation has changed and it is now not as vital or important and the current advice is to abandon it. This is simple evolution folks. The world is constantly changing.

The country fully acknowledges your zeal to discredit things done in previous administrations. Just stop your pomposity and arragance. You really have nothing to show for it other than your consistant blaming of others.

Prove yourself on your own merits, for the good of our citizens and integrity of our country.

Posted by: mark_mcgovern | September 17, 2009 2:39 PM

Barack Hussein Obama-The democRAT's latest surrender monkey to live in the White House!

Posted by: cschotta1 | September 17, 2009 1:24 PM

There will be opposition from entrenched political forces in Congress to challenge curtailment of Polish and Czech anti-missile stations, as agreed under GWB.

The larger strategic policy issue is how to bring regional (non)proliferation of nuclear weapons under NPT control and under IAEA intrusive inspection regime, including Israel, India, Pakistan and N Korea. And as long as there are double standards under NPT, it'd be difficult to enforce any regime on Iran alone!

Posted by: hariknaidu | September 17, 2009 11:38 AM

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.



 
 
 

© 2009 The Washington Post Company