Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama Eyes Middle Ground on Afghanistan

By Ben Pershing
Fairly or not, President Obama has in the past been dubbed the "compromiser-in-chief" because of his inclination toward the middle ground. That may well be where he's headed on Afghanistan.

At a meeting Tuesday with congressional leaders from both parties, the Los Angeles Times reports, "Obama did not indicate to the bipartisan group whether he is leaning toward or against a significant troop escalation. Instead, he suggested he is looking at the middle range of the spectrum, somewhere between a major increase in forces and a large drawdown." The New York Times says Obama told lawmakers "that he would not substantially reduce American forces in Afghanistan or shift the mission to just hunting terrorists there, but he indicated that he remained undecided about the major troop buildup proposed by his commanding general." And, the Times adds, Obama had a "pointed exchange" with John McCain over the pace of his decision-making, while Nancy Pelosi, Carl Levin and David Obey "voiced reservations" about a troop increase. (Sarah Palin, who was not at the White House Tuesday, thinks we should send more troops.)

Continue reading at Political Browser »

By Ben Pershing  |  October 7, 2009; 8:27 AM ET
Categories:  The Rundown  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Obama to Keynote Gay-Rights Dinner With Lady Gaga, "Glee"
Next: Obama Indonesia Trip Set for 2010

Comments

If Karzai had been elected legitimately or was at least accepted by the majority of the country Obama would accept McChrystal's plan. Karzai won by fraud and he is not acceptable to the people of Afghanistan. If Karzai shows that he can be reasoned with Obama will go with McChrystal, otherwise he will not.

Posted by: Gator-ron | October 7, 2009 2:06 PM | Report abuse

Pointing out an inaccuracy. Palin is a self described pit bull. She does not think, she responds like the political animal she is. Thank you for reporting what those incapable of thought want.

Posted by: Gator-ron | October 7, 2009 1:56 PM | Report abuse

The best solution to the Afghanistan problem is to move out of Afghanistan and into the no man's land between Afghanistan and Pakistan and concentrate on neutralizing both the Taliban and al-Qaeda. This would be a military operation with recon and air power not involved in the politics of Afghanistan or Pakistan. Aid to these nations would be only as requested. We are not there to change the world; we are there to protect the interests of all nations by eliminating terrorist threats to all of the free world.

Posted by: OchamsRazor | October 7, 2009 12:16 PM | Report abuse

THE 'ENDLESS WAR' WILL DEFEAT THE OBAMA PRESIDENCY IF POTUS DOES NOT WAKE UP AND SMELL THE INCIPIENT COUP D'ETAT

* "Seven Days in May" McChrystal just the latest ominous sign


Will President Obama realize that the "endless war" strategy, costing the nation much blood and treasure, is fueling a hard-right silent coup that already has decimated democracy and made a mockery of the rule of law at the GRASSROOTS -- where Democrats are weakest?

***


SILENT, HARMFUL MICROWAVE AND LASER DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS DEPLOYED AGAINST AMERICAN CITIZENS BY MULTI-AGENCY FED PROGRAM

• Physical and Neurological Impairment Under the Cover of Telecommunications, "Less-Lethal" Law Enforcement Weaponry -- A Crime Against Humanity


A federal-local multi-agency coordinated action program -- an ongoing legacy of the Bush-Cheney years -- is committing a quiet genocide on thousands of unjustly targeted Americans...

...via microwave/laser weaponry; covert financial exploitation; and a grassroots vigilante army fronted by community policing, town watch and anti-terrorism units who use covertly placed warrantless GPS devices and cell phones to stalk their targets...

... a GRASSROOTS GESTAPO protected by federal and local law enforcement who know all about it...

...a domestic "torture matrix" hiding in plain sight, unreported by a complacent, manipulated mainstream media, unquestioned by naive and apparently misinformed Obama officials.

PRESIDENT OBAMA:

BAN the use of microwave and laser weaponry against the American people; and

BAN the warrantless GPS/cell phone tracking of U.S. citizens -- the electronic backbone of a GRASSROOTS GESTAPO now operating on your watch.

http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america

OR (if link is corrupted / disabled):

http://NowPublic.com/scrivener RE: "GESTAPO USA"

Posted by: scrivener50 | October 7, 2009 11:28 AM | Report abuse

There is simply, "NO MIDDLE GROUND"! We lost the war 8 years ago and have followed a path of no strategy/win and blundered our way along impacting useless bloodshed and waste of treasure. We cannot win a war the Afghan's do not buy into. We tried it before and neglected to profit from our lessons in VietNam. It is time to declare victory and leave. NOW!!! We prop up a corrupt central government in a land where equality and democracy are unworkable and unknown.

Posted by: robjen116 | October 7, 2009 11:26 AM | Report abuse

Win the Hearts and Minds. To do that we should drill a water well and put up a wind mill that generates electricity for each small village and then leave the population in each area alone. When building these improvements we have to have a large on-site security force and the trucks delivering the materials have to be protected. We were short handed in Iraq in 2006, I know I was there, and if we had the security forces to repair the Iraqi infrastructure quickly and efficiently, we would have been out of there already. Instead we aggravated the Iraqi's by not getting much done due to security shortfalls, ie. contractors being harrasses, deliveries being hijacked/stolen drivers killed and the work areas being a non secure place.
Bottom line, go in with large force, get the job done then leave. Let them have a positive view of us getting in, helping their living conditions then getting out, instead of a constant aggravation. That's the best we can do without re-drawing middle east maps to appease them.

Posted by: mjpierno | October 7, 2009 10:03 AM | Report abuse

How about.. 'Compromiser-in-Chief'
.. 'Chameleon-in-Chief'
.. 'Conde' Nast Traveler-in-Chief'

Posted by: newbeeboy | October 7, 2009 9:49 AM | Report abuse

"Compromiser-in-chief"???

Cut the political correctness cr@p already. How about the incompetent, indecisive, chicken sh^t, "present" voting, dumbazz-in-chief!!!

Posted by: Bcamp55 | October 7, 2009 8:57 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company