Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama weighs in on abortion -- carefully

By Ben Pershing
Liberals spent a good portion of the health-care debate complaining that President Obama was insufficiently committed to including the public option in a reform bill, accusing him of sacrificing a cause that was important to them for the sake of political expediency. It sounds as though Obama is trying -- cautiously -- to avoid the same charge on abortion.

In an interview with ABC News Monday, Obama weighed in on the controversy that has divided Democrats. "I laid out a very simple principle, which is this is a health care bill, not an abortion bill," Obama said. "And we're not looking to change what is the principle that has been in place for a very long time, which is federal dollars are not used to subsidize abortions. And I want to make sure that the provision that emerges meets that test -- that we are not in some way sneaking in funding for abortions, but, on the other hand, that we're not restricting women's insurance choices, because one of the pledges I made in that same speech was to say that if you're happy and satisfied with the insurance that you have, that it's not going to change." He added: "There are strong feelings on both sides, and what that tells me is that there needs to be some more work before we get to the point where we're not changing the status quo."

What exactly does all that "on the one hand, on the other hand" mean? The New York Times writes that Obama "suggested Monday that he was not comfortable with abortion restrictions inserted into the House version of major health care legislation, and he prodded Congress to revise them." Roll Call says abortion rights supporters "got a critical boost" from Obama's comments, and adds that more than 40 Democrats have now vowed to vote against a conference report that includes the Stupak language. How should the language be changed, and if it is, would the coalition that passed the measure in the House Saturday fall apart? Politico writes that Senate moderates like Ben Nelson, Kent Conrad and Mary Landrieu all urged Harry Reid Monday to include restrictions on abortion funding in the Senate bill as well.

Continue reading at Political Browser »

By Ben Pershing  |  November 10, 2009; 8:12 AM ET
Categories:  The Rundown  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Somber trip to Fort Hood for president
Next: Midday Quiz: State of the GOP


I have been very disturbed what I have been hearing on one news network about C Street in Washington D.C. I was wondering why no one else has picked up on this story . The C street residence is a secretive religious group which houses members of our Congressman and Senators. Jeff Sharlet has done extensive research on this group and wrote a book called" The Family" Senator Ensign from Nevada just left the organization for drawing attention to it. This is a good investigative story that we the people need to be informed about. These lawmakers need to be accountable for the laws they cast upon us.Especially when they believe they are above the law. They are Democrats and Republicians that belong to this organization. We need a good journalist to do an extensive investigation on these members.Please don't ignor this story. We also need to know if they list this house as a church do they receive tax benefits also which is important. What happened to seperation of church and state?

Posted by: jnjkelly48 | November 10, 2009 12:55 PM | Report abuse

The question of abortion wasn't beyond Obama's pay grade when he was a two-bit Illinois state senator. He promoted and voted for one of the most barbaric laws ever enacted in the United States for killing full-term babies.

Posted by: Jerzy | November 10, 2009 10:35 AM | Report abuse

As President Obama has said before, the question of abortion is beyond his pay grade.

Posted by: sam38 | November 10, 2009 10:07 AM | Report abuse

Obama gets slammed by the press for being too aggressive in his language on certain issues. Obama gets slammed by the press for being too "careful" when discussing other issues.

The problem is with the press, not the president.

Posted by: parkerfl1 | November 10, 2009 10:03 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company