Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Reform takes 'a giant step' forward

By Ben Pershing
In a saga that has included countless press conferences, high-profile speeches and one seeming climax after another, it may turn out that Sunday's 1 a.m. procedural vote in a snow-muffled Capitol was the most important milestone in the entire health-care debate.

"The Senate took a giant step toward passing its sweeping health care bill early today," the Los Angeles Times ledes, "uniting fractious Democrats after months of debate over President Obama's promise to reduce the ranks of the uninsured." The Washington Post calls it a "milestone victory," but observes: "A challenging closing round of negotiations, culminating in a series of compromises with moderates, threatened to overshadow the significance of what Democrats believed they were close to achieving: the most significant health-care legislation since Medicare and Medicaid were created in 1965." Paul Krugman calls the impending passage "an awesome achievement. It's a seriously flawed bill, we'll spend years if not decades fixing it, but it's nonetheless a huge step forward."

The Hill's headline says Harry Reid was "vindicated" by the vote. But Time wonders: "Did the road to passage really have to be this rocky? The shape of the legislation -- and specifically, the fact that there were never going to be 60 votes in the Senate for a government-run public option -- has been clear for months. So why did Reid insist upon taking the public option to the Senate floor as part of the initial bill he introduced, making the fight even messier and at times seriously jeopardizing Dems' chances of passing such a landmark bill?" Time chalks it up to Reid's own reelection campaign, but there is another obvious reason: Dropping the public option without the Christmas deadline looming risked a more substantial liberal revolt. Instead, Reid got his 60 votes, even as the Left steamed and Russ Feingold openly blamed Obama for the loss of the public option.

Continue reading at Political Browser »

By Ben Pershing  |  December 21, 2009; 8:30 AM ET
Categories:  The Rundown  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Axelrod defends merits of Senate health bill
Next: AMA supports latest Senate health care bill


Health Insurers Win Rounds One and Two - Take Our Poll
Senator Ben “$1,258,660″ Nelson (D-NE) successfully extorted extra Medicaid money for his state and managed to reduce abortion coverage before agreeing that he will cast the vital 60th. vote in favor of the shabby bill that the Senate wants to present as health care reform.

The Senate bill replaces the public option (a new, independent insurance exchange, available to everyone) with a plan that is similar to the one that federal employees enjoy. The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) allows insurance companies and employee associations, such as labor unions to develop health, dental, and allied plans and market them to governmental employees. While close to a public option the new offering suffers from one major flaw – the private insurers can carry on colluding to fix prices and offerings and the government will have little or no control. [...]

Posted by: verna2 | December 21, 2009 11:31 AM | Report abuse

No matter what's in the bill, the president has delivered on his promise to see a health care bill through Congress. This fact cannot be understated.

Posted by: parkerfl1 | December 21, 2009 10:23 AM | Report abuse

I am disappointed with the Senators from the State of Illinois.

Why? Because they failed to receive any help for Illinois to pay for the mandates relating to Medicaid that are included in the pending legislation.

The residents of Illinois should receive the same consideration that the taxpayers of Nebraska and Louisiana are receiving.

Posted by: mwhoke | December 21, 2009 8:44 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company