Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Insurers quietly fund opposition to Democrats' health push

Updated 9:30 p.m.
By Dan Eggen
The nation's largest health insurance group confirmed Tuesday that it quietly funneled millions of dollars to an advertising campaign opposing Democratic health-care legislation even as it was publicly pledging support for reform.

National Journal reported that six major health insurers -- Aetna, Cigna, Humana, Kaiser Foundation Health Plans, UnitedHealth Group and Wellpoint -- contributed up to $20 million to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to help fund a $100 million anti-reform ad campaign that began last year. The magazine, citing two unidentified health-care lobbyists, said the money was solicited by America's Health Insurance Plans, the industry trade group which professed early support for the Obama administration's reform plans before souring on major provisions of the legislation.

AHIP press secretary Robert Zirkelbach confirmed the group's support for the advertising campaign, saying in a statement that many of the employers who purchase insurance plans were opposed to key parts of the health-care legislation under consideration in Congress.

"We share the very serious concerns employers have raised about provisions that will increase health-care costs, including new premium taxes that will hit businesses hard," Zirkelbach said. "So when the employer community -- our customers -- asked us to contribute to their campaign, we readily agreed."

But one insurer, Kaiser Foundation Health Plans, said National Journal erred in naming it as a contributor to the chamber campaign.

"When we provided funds to AHIP last year, we insisted, and AHIP agreed in writing, that our funds could only be used for positive advertising in support of passing health reform," said Kaiser spokesman John E. Nelson.

The White House and reform advocates seized on the report as further evidence that the insurance industry has been attempting to undermine reform while claiming to support it. White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer wrote in a blog posting that "big insurance companies are fighting tooth and nail to kill health reform that will wrest power from their hands and give it to American families."

Pfeiffer added, "It's no surprise that the insurance companies who profit from the broken status quo would oppose fixing the system."

Bruce Josten, the chamber's executive vice president dor government affairs, said in a statement that "we welcome any donors/funders to our effort."

"The Chamber is fully engaged in the health care reform debate because it's critical to the future of our economy, and our members are the ones who pay for health care," Josten said.

The insurance and business lobbies have frequently stumbled in their attempts to influence health-care legislation over the last year. AHIP's release of a critical study on the cusp of a Senate Finance Committee vote last October blew up because of shortcomings in the data, while the chamber abandoned plans in November to spend $50,000 on a study concluding that reform would "kill jobs and hurt the economy."

Critics of health reform argue that the chamber's ad campaign and other efforts have helped to soften mandates on employers and have likely killed the chances that a government-run insurance plan will be included in a final bill.

The new report comes at a fortuitous time for health-reform proponents, who nervously await the outcome of negotiations over a compromise reform bill that can pass muster in the liberal House and more conservative Senate. The debate is complicated further by the surprisingly close Senate race between GOP candidate Scott Brown and Democrat Martha Coakley, who are vying to take over the seat held by the late senator Edward M. Kennedy (D). A victory by Brown could threaten the ability of Democrats to reach the 60-vote threshold for passage in the Senate.

By Dan Eggen  |  January 12, 2010; 8:00 PM ET
Categories:  44 The Obama Presidency , Health Care  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Palin says new book tells 'a lie' about her
Next: Health reform looms in Mass. Senate race


Disabled minority woman shot at 14 times while living in federally subsidized housing in Lane County Oregon, DA refused to prosecute. Video on-line at
Extensive information at under “Foundation Trilogy”
The national ramification of our case is, who is going to oversee the over $20 BILLION in Healthcare bill funds in the upcoming Healthcare bill that will go to “non profits”. Our situation is federal housing funds were granted to the State of Oregon. They sub-granted to Lane County Board of County Commissioners, Faye Stewart Southern Lane County Commissioner. They sub-granted to a “non profit”, Community Sharing Program (CSP) in Cottage Grove Oregon, Faye Stewart Board Member. We raised the issue that CSP was invoicing the federal government for services not rendered (fraud) with the State. CSP with the approval of Faye Stewart removed us from the program using 2 known false documents. Then the landlord started shooting at us. He shot at us 14 times over a 2 week period. The Lane County DA refused to prosecute; the DA’s budget is under the control of the Lane County Commissioners.
So in the upcoming Healthcare bill if you have a problem of mis-management or fraud of federal funds granted to a “non profit” at the local level, to whom would you seek redress? We are talking about over $20 BILLION to be doled out on the local level that will be monitored by no independent entity. Do you trust your local officials that much?

Posted by: Foundation-Trilogy | January 13, 2010 12:26 PM | Report abuse

If the health care reform is not good for the American public then why are the insurance companies and the republican party against it. Wake up you fools it is a good start and remember the republicans are for the ins. companies and against you.

Posted by: SWAMPYPD | January 13, 2010 9:45 AM | Report abuse

And why, exactly, aren't Democrats and the White House using this opposition to reform and the Republicans siding with the insurers (second only to lawyers as pure evil in the eyes of most Americans) as a beneficial tool to win support for health care legislation and bludgeon the GOP?

Posted by: parkerfl1 | January 12, 2010 8:58 PM | Report abuse

"So when the employer community -- our customers -- asked us to contribute to their campaign, we readily agreed."

Interesting that private insurers do NOT see patients as customers. No wonder we have the most expensive and worst health care in the developed world, assuming the US still counts as "developed."

Posted by: mnjam | January 12, 2010 8:11 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company