Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Despite gestures, bipartisanship remains elusive

By Ben Pershing
Can Republicans and Democrats work together on anything important? Tuesday's picture was decidedly mixed: At a surprise press conference, President Obama called for bipartisanship, but also gave some stern warnings to Republicans. At a meeting of party leaders beforehand, Republicans and Democrats both called for bipartisanship, but couldn't agree on anything. And in the Senate, the two sides tried to cut a deal on a jobs bill, but couldn't get it done before the latest snowstorm blew into town.

"President Obama appealed for bipartisanship from the podium of the White House briefing room today, calling on Democrats and Republicans to 'put aside matters of party,' while condemning the 'obstinacy' that he says is rooted in 'political expedience,'" ABC News reports. Though Obama joked about Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell "making snow angels" on the White House lawn, the New York Times says "his laughter gave way to a forceful message, saying that bipartisanship was a two-way street and neither side - including Democrats - could get their way. He said there needed to be at least some cooperation, but he offered no specific path for the legislative way forward." Time sees the appearance as part of "a delicate strategy that calls for Obama to reposition himself as a bipartisan outsider fighting to change Washington even as his aides increasingly play the sharply partisan inside game."

The Los Angeles Times observes that "politicians love these quick-hit confrontations with the press because the media have not had the usual days of prep time to phrase the toughest possible questions where the exits are hidden and dodging is difficult. So the politician has the element of surprise and offense. Obama even admitted the same, perhaps accidentally. His final words today: 'That was pretty good. Thanks.' Not the comment of someone just waterboarded." Dana Milbank says Obama, "in Henny Youngman style, compared the political opposition to the first lady." Jake Tapper wonders, "Is there even bipartisan agreement on what 'bipartisan' means?" Mark Knoller's headline: "Obama Says Bipartisanship, But What He Wants Is GOP Surrender."

Obama delivered a similarly mixed message during his meeting with congressional leaders. Roll Call writes that "Congressional leaders from both parties put on their happy faces after Tuesday's meeting at the White House, but nobody could point to any bipartisan progress made toward advancing Democrats' priority issues." The Washington Post says "the two-hour session was part of a renewed drive by the White House to create legislation by consensus, regardless of party label. Obama tried the approach after he took office, but it did not take hold."

And the common ground between the two sides has its limits -- Republicans may boycott Obama's proposed health summit, and Obama may recess appoint some executive branch nominees because he's tired of delays. "Obama said he warned the Congressional leaders face-to-face that he will use his power to unilaterally fill some empty positions if the logjam in the Senate cannot be broken," Politico writes. The New York Times says "Obama and Republican leaders, each eager to show they can put aside partisanship, agreed Wednesday that they had pinpointed a handful of areas -- most of them related to jobs creation -- where the two sides might be able to work together. But as if to punctuate that the talk of bipartisanship goes only so far, Senate Republicans subsequently voted to block Mr. Obama's choice of Craig Becker, a labor lawyer, for the National Labor Relations Board."

As for that jobs bill, the efforts at bipartisanship have been genuine, but there's no agreement yet. "Senate Democrats are pushing for approval this month of a job-creation bill that includes a payroll-tax holiday for companies that hire unemployed workers," Bloomberg writes, as "the plan announced yesterday by ... Reid would will give small businesses more power to write off investment costs, extend the Build America Bonds program that subsidizes interest payments on local government bonds and continue the federal highway construction program through year's end." Reid "backed off his push to begin floor debate on an $80 billion jobs bill" Tuesday night because of the snowstorm, Roll Call reports, adding that "members of both parties [were] balking at taking up a bill sight unseen" and "Republican members of the Finance Committee expressed lingering reservations with the deal, and Republicans said they were generally uncomfortable with Reid's timeline." Politico reports "several key Democrats say there is no deal" on the bill yet, and in a separate story, notes that Nancy Pelosi dislikes the bill's centerpiece job-creation tax credit.

The Los Angeles Times cautions, "How long even symbolic gestures of bipartisanship would last was unclear. The parties are still approaching each other warily. ... Still, even an approach to seeking common ground was notable, especially in the Senate, where Republicans had appeared to be reveling in their newfound power to undermine Democratic initiatives." The Wall Street Journal takes a broader ook at the gridlock: "The Senate's plodding pace has always distressed those in Washington eager to get things done quickly. Now, with Democrats and Republicans stalemated on everything from major legislation to agency appointments, some are asking whether the institution is broken." The New York Times contributes a statistical profile of the House and Senate: "Congress now includes more women and Asians than ever, but it is considerably less diverse, older, better educated, more likely to have served in the military and not as likely to have been born abroad than Americans over all."

On the reform front, "Obama said Tuesday that he will consider any Republican health care ideas, as long as the ideas address the goals contained in the Democratic plans already passed by the House and Senate," USA Today reports. Democrats are still trying to figure out a way to get their bill passed without starting over. CongressDaily says "House Speaker Pelosi's top healthcare adviser today outlined a plan that would allow both chambers to make changes to the Senate healthcare overhaul before the overhaul becomes law. Wendell Primus said the plan is to have President Obama sign the Senate bill before signing the legislation making the changes, even though Congress will approve them in reverse to satisfy skeptical House members who refuse to pass the Senate bill before changes are made." The Hill is the latest outlet to take a shot at Rahm Emanuel's handling of health care, writing that "the emerging consensus among critics in both chambers is that Emanuel's lack of Senate experience slowed President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. The share of the blame comes as cracks are beginning to show in Emanuel's once-impregnable political armor."

The various efforts at bipartisanship come as the new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows "Republicans have significantly narrowed the gap with Democrats on who is trusted to deal with the country's problems and have sharply reduced several of President Obama's main political advantages." The survey showed the generic congressional ballot tied at 46 percent apiece, while Obama's approval rating was at 51 percent. For comparison, Gallup also has the generic ballot tied and puts Obama's approval at 50 percent, though other recent surveys give the president lower marks.

ABC News reports: "Disapproval of Congress, at 71 percent, matches its highest since 1994, when the GOP swept to control in a midterm rout of the Democrats. Americans by a 20-point margin say they're inclined to look around for someone new to support for Congress. And by a 13-point margin, 48 to 35 percent, Americans call themselves anti-incumbent rather than pro-incumbent - not quite the levels in 1994 or 2006 (when the Democrats regained control) but broad nonetheless." For her part, Pelosi "is literally laughing off the suggestion House Democrats could lose their majority in the midterm elections," Roll Call writes, as the Speaker tells the paper her party will "definitely" keep power in November.

By Ben Pershing  |  February 10, 2010; 8:00 AM ET
Categories:  The Rundown  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Obama considers recess appointments
Next: Kit Bond says White House adviser John Brennan 'needs to go'


Shouldn't both parties agree that the U.S. government should not be silently irradiating citizens with harmful microwaves from a secret cell tower- based weapon system?


* Thousands of Americans slandered as "dissidents" or undesirables, targeted by Bush legacy program for debilitating, cell tower- based microwave assault, held hostage in their own homes to fed-supported vigilante "community policing" stalking units equipped with warrantless GPS devices, who vandalize and terrorize as local police look the other way.

* "Directed energy weapons" -- a nationwide installation employing cell towers and satellites -- induce weakness, exhaustion, mood changes, pain, head and body aches, physical and neurological impairment, strokes, aneurysms, cancer -- and many victims do not realize what is making them sick.

* Regional Homeland Security- administered "fusion centers" reportedly serve as command centers for covert electromagnetic radiation attacks, pervasive surveillance, financial sabotage of those identified as "dissidents," "trouble-makers" or slandered as threats to society.

* Use of microwave weaponry to torture and impair political opponents recently confirmed by deposed Honduras President Manuel Zelaya.

* Pleas for justice, to local police and FBI, go unanswered -- as do demands for a Department of Justice Civil Rights Division investigation and congressional hearings.

"These are crimes against humanity and the Constitution, being perpetrated under the cover of national security and 'safe streets' by multiple federal and local agencies and commands -- an American genocide hiding in plain sight, enabled by the naivete of those who think 'it can't happen here.'" -- Victor Livingston, former reporter for WTXF-TV Philadelphia, Phila. Bulletin, N.Y. Daily News, St. Petersburg Times; producer/host, MSG Network Sports Business Report; columnist,

See: (Journalism Groups -- REPORTING" section) OR

BUCKS COUNTY, PA MAGLOCLEN FUSION CENTER -- "Ground Zero of an American Gestapo"

OR (see "stories" list).

Posted by: scrivener50 | February 10, 2010 1:38 PM | Report abuse

Obama is taking advantage of his influence with the media, using up his chits with reporters who begin to see his duplicity, but are not ready to call him on it.
Instead I hear them say in so many words, without actually calling him on it, that Obama is using the "health summit" as a PR vehicle.
While reporters understand that the effort is not what Obama is saying it is, they are not going to tell the American people something that is so blatantly critical of the President.
When that good will with reporters is used up, and they get sick of being played like sycophants, maybe we will hear honest analyses of what Obama is doing.
If you think a politician is saying one thing and doing another, it is your responsibility to call them on it, no matter how great a symbol they are of racial harmony and progress and the liberal world view.

Posted by: johnL1 | February 10, 2010 10:19 AM | Report abuse

It's hard to compromise with the minority party when their leaders are sending huge letters filled with demands that must be met just for them to show up - let alone agree to something - at Obama's big "bipartisan" meeting.

Posted by: parkerfl1 | February 10, 2010 9:02 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company