Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Obama heads west to help Reid

By Ben Pershing
If you want to gauge a president's popularity, you can always look at the polls. Or you can simply look at lawmakers from his own party. Do they want the president's help, or not?

For Harry Reid and Michael Bennet this week, the answer is yes. And both men need it. "President Obama dipped into two hotly contested Senate races on Thursday, flying out West to raise money and rally the Democratic troops for two struggling lawmakers," the New York Times writes, adding: "The Western swing ... comes as an anti-incumbent mood is threatening the strength of Democrats' hold on the Senate." ABC News says Obama's visit to Colorado and Nevada "looks like the start of a nine-month effort to save the Democratic majority in the Senate. ... An administration official noted that the Bennet event has been on the president's schedule for some time and cautioned against reading into it as a 'reactionary' trip because of recent political events or the state of the race in Colorado."

Politics Daily notes that "it's the third February in a row that Obama's visited" Denver, having signed the stimulus bill there in 2009 and attended a packed campaign rally in 2008. In 2010, "The president stumped for the rookie Democratic senator in front of about 2,700 people packed into Fillmore Auditorium, then cruised through town in his motorcade to a cocktail fundraiser at the downtown Sheraton," the Denver Post reports, with Obama raising $675,000 for Bennet along the way. "Obama rallied behind Colorado's junior senator and his entire reeling party Thursday, portraying Democrats as the leaders willing to 'confront the real problems' in a nation disgusted with partisan squabbling," the Associated Press writes.

In Nevada Friday, Obama is scheduled to do a morning town-hall meeting at a high school in Henderson, and then will deliver a midday speech at the Las Vegas CityCenter. (Fortunately for the White House message shop, neither appearance conflicts with the real newsmaker event of the day -- Tiger Woods.) The Los Angeles Times reports: "When the president visits Las Vegas on Friday he will find that Nevada is no longer the economic basket case he came to know during his frequent campaign stops. It's gotten worse. ... When the economy swooned and nearly collapsed in the fall of 2008, Obama was the political beneficiary. He won Nevada, a conservative-leaning state, by a startling 12 percentage points over Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona. More than 60% of voters surveyed said the economy was their uppermost concern and 3 in 5 of them voted for Obama. Now, fairly or not, many people blame the president for the bad times."

They also blame Reid, which explains why the Majority Leader wants help from the White House and anywhere else he can get it. Their relationship is clear: "Reid's own job is at stake, as is the fate of Obama's agenda in the chamber Reid controls," writes the Washington Post, while Politico says "Obama needs Harry Reid to get his legislative agenda through the Senate. Reid needs Obama for something more -- his political survival. ... Obama, whose administration was blindsided last week by Reid's decision to abort a bipartisan jobs bill, isn't holding a grudge but instead sees Reid's success as essential to his own." Reid "defended the Democratic Party's agenda and President Obama at two events this morning hours before Obama's arrival in Las Vegas," the Las Vegas Sun reported Thursday, as the Majority Leader made the case that the stimulus package has worked.

Obama didn't arrive in Nevada empty-handed. ""Obama will announce a plan Friday to direct $1.5 billion in taxpayer money to five state housing finance agencies to help them develop new programs for addressing the housing crisis in their communities," The Washington Post reports. Nevada is one of the five states set to receive the assistance. (You're welcome, Sen. Reid.) The Wall Street Journal says "the program ... is for states where the average home value for all homeowners in the state has dropped more than 20% from its value at the height of the housing bubble." The Associated Press says "Obama's move ... is the latest by a White House determined to show it is helping families rebound from a deep recession. The downturn is taking an election-year toll on Obama's party as voter frustration builds."

On health care, is a compromise bill finally in the offing? Sort of. Roll Call explains: "The White House has developed its own version of a merged House-Senate health care reform package and plans to have it online for public review by Monday in advance of a bipartisan health care summit scheduled for Feb. 25. However, a senior Democratic aide said Thursday evening that the bill was assembled without any input from House and Senate Democratic leaders, and cautioned that it should not be viewed as an agreement to reconcile the two chambers' bills." The Los Angeles Times says Obama's "plan will probably offer the most detailed vision yet of where the president stands on a number of contentious healthcare issues that have divided Democrats, including how to pay for a major expansion of medical coverage. Administration officials and congressional Democrats are nearing such a compromise, according to Democratic officials. It is still unclear what, if any, concessions the president will make to Republicans, who have steadfastly opposed Obama's push for an overhaul."

Meanwhile, "a firestorm between the Obama administration and health insurers escalated Thursday," the Wall Street Journal reports, "as the Department of Health and Human Services pointed to double-digit price increases or attempted increases in six states to make the case for overhauling the health-care system." Here's another development insurers won't like -- the public option is still a possibility, as it could theoretically be created via reconciliation. Jonathan Cohn says " I'm a longtime, enthusiastic fan of the public option. And I am really nervous about its latest rise from the grave. ... Is it really possible to pass the public option? That's where I become skeptical." Ezra Klein looks at the pros and cons: "Not only are you throwing out any hope of appearing even slightly bipartisan, but you're also increasing internal dissension and adding unpredictability into a process that's collapsed into chaos already. But there's an upside, and it's not just that the public option is good policy. The public option is also popular policy."

At the Marriott Wardman Park Friday, the CPAC conference soldiers on. The Fix focuses on Tim Pawlenty's appearance -- "a coming-out-party of sorts for the little-known governor who has his eye on a presidential bid in 2012." AP looks at the Minnesotan's record: "Like most Republicans with eyes on the White House, Gov. Tim Pawlenty can boast that he's introduced a long list of conservative initiatives. In Pawlenty's case, many of them sank as soon their splashy news conferences were over." says "the pressure is on" for Pawlenty Friday. In case you midded it, the governor's interview with Esquire was released last week.

The New York Times paints the scene from Thursday: "Mitt Romney, a likely Republican candidate for president in 2012, offered a systematic indictment of what he described as the failed presidency of Barack Obama. A little earlier, a crowd of conservatives whooped in delight as a speaker made coy allusions to Mr. Obama's youthful experimentation with cocaine." Romney drew wide notice. "Sounding like a potential rival for President Obama in 2012, Mitt Romney delivered a brutal critique yesterday of what he called American liberal 'neo-monarchists'' as he sought the favor of traditional conservatives and insurgent tea party activists at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference," the Boston Globe writes. Romney said Obama "fails to understand America," and Ben Smith observes that "Obama's 'Americanness' was the subject of a famous, and largely ignored, memo from Hillary Clinton pollster Mark Penn to the candidate that suggested Clinton exploit questions about Obama's specifically American values."

On the brighter side for Democrats, USA Today writes: "Amid sinking poll numbers and a spate of retirements by veteran lawmakers, Democrats have one early advantage heading into November's congressional elections: money. Democratic incumbents in the nation's most competitive races hold a substantial financial edge over their Republican challengers, a USA TODAY analysis of recent campaign reports shows." Stan Greenberg says "President Obama and the Democratic Party need to urgently revisit 1994. By paying close attention to the lessons of that year--lessons about presidential leadership, the consequences of congressional melodrama, the need for an economic narrative and for a defining choice in the election--the worst can be avoided."

Charlie Cook is pessimistic about both parties: "What we have seen in recent years is total dysfunction. Leading up to the 2006 election, we had a Republican-controlled Congress and a Republican president, and Washington was dysfunctional. Then for two years we had a Democratic Congress and a Republican president. That, too, was dysfunctional. Now we have a Democratic Congress and Democratic president, and the federal government is still dysfunctional. After November's midterm elections, we may very well have a Republican House and a marginally Democratic Senate to go with a Democratic president. My bet is that dysfunction will continue to reign."

By Ben Pershing  |  February 19, 2010; 8:00 AM ET
Categories:  The Rundown  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Obama rallies for Sen. Bennet at Colo. fundraiser
Next: Sestak alleges WH offered him a job to drop Senate bid


Since Barry handed out $1.5Billion of our dollars to home owners in Vegas, I have one question. Where's mine? I am a homeowner who has stood firm in not walking away from my mortgage through all of the turmoil, yet I live in the midwest and even though I have asked Obama, in phone and email messages, the only response I got was a deafening silence. But then both of my Senators are REPUBLICANS, which in Barry's mind makes a big difference. Tax dollars are only supposed to be used to bailout the incompetents of DNC membership.

Posted by: jonweiss1 | February 20, 2010 8:09 AM | Report abuse

Maybe Soetoro, Reid and Pelosi could tell me where I could get away from there social constructed order enforced via "cell phone" towers. I was born to do more than be a servant to the state. I will never vote democrat again, motivation is one thing, torturing americans with radiation is what these criminal-socialist are doing

Posted by: jackson26 | February 20, 2010 1:03 AM | Report abuse

I see you did accept my post. I must have pressed the button twice is the reason I got that message. My Apologies.

Posted by: egw7777 | February 19, 2010 2:17 PM | Report abuse

I have not posted a comment on this internet site today. Is it you do not like my comments.

Posted by: egw7777 | February 19, 2010 2:14 PM | Report abuse

This is a waste of taxpayers money for Obama to fly around the country campaigning for Democrats especially Harry Reid who is such an insult to all American people for him being in office as long as he has been & using his powers to bribe Senators to get their votes for things the people of America do not want. Him & Pelosi are scandalous & embarrassing. I hope he gets voted out.

Posted by: egw7777 | February 19, 2010 2:12 PM | Report abuse

America really needs to start by taking control of its monetary system! The Federal Reserve owns and controls our money, but they are not a branch of our government!! They are an independent central bank that controls our dollar, our economy, and our political system!!!

Posted by: AMERICAWAKEUP | February 19, 2010 1:43 PM | Report abuse

Let's hope Obama visits every state that has a congressional race coming up because every time he goes to campaign for a Democrat, the Democrat LOSES !!!!

Obama just doesn't get it....the majority don't want his Democratic / Socialist agenda.

Posted by: tomaz13 | February 19, 2010 1:37 PM | Report abuse

Additionally, It is time to expel all three branches of government, then start anew in the true spirit of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. A true modern day Revolution could start by recalling a member of each party in both houses prior to ejecting all politicians.

Create a Constitutional amendment reversing Supreme Court Judges tenure.

The president should bar all lobbyist from entering any public building housing political representatives.

To prevent the reckless loss of American Service People in loss wars not needed or wanted by the public. The remedy is to
re-enact the draft. This would end all wars when everybody has to fight in all wars.

Following this outline would cement is stone The Government is an Institution FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE and NOT PRIVATE INTEREST.

Posted by: danthony930 | February 19, 2010 1:35 PM | Report abuse

Leave Harry Reid on his own just as he has looked out for himself instead of looking out for the American People. He lacks the backbone to be the majority leader of the U.S. Senate. He also lacks the authority needed to even lead the fellow Democrat Senators. It is too late for him to morph. into another LBJ.

The same is to be said of Speaker Pelosi. It is too late for her to morph into Tip O'neil.

These two politicians are akin to entering two horses into the Kentucky Derby with only three legs. They cannot lead from wire-wire or cross the finish line. let alone lead at any point of the race.

Posted by: danthony930 | February 19, 2010 1:13 PM | Report abuse


Posted by: otisplumber | February 19, 2010 1:08 PM | Report abuse

(If I was running for office and had the President show up for me, i run like hell in the other direction. This will be strike four and five ,when these two are thrown out. I would love to see him help out Nancy.

Posted by: cj362810 | February 19, 2010 11:49 AM | Report abuse


What Obama must do is take bold action to fulfill his basic campaign promise -- restore a sense of justice and respect for the rule of law in a nation despoiled by eight years of Bush-Cheney authoritarianism. Indeed, this "multi-agency coordinated action program" may be inciting domestic violence in America, as opposed to "keeping America safe."


• Precision-targeted microwave frequencies injure, induce fatigue, mood changes, debilitating physiological and neurological effects -- electromagnetic enslavement of citizens deemed to be "dissidents" or undesirables.

• Senior security team aware of secretive Bush-legacy "multi-agency coordinated action" involving microwave assaults and local community watch harassment of U.S. citizens deemed to be "dissidents" or undesirables -- an American genocide.

• What are Bush-Cheney leave-behinds telling Obama, Biden, Holder, Napolitano, Panetta?

OR: (see articles list) ) OR:

Posted by: scrivener50 | February 19, 2010 11:34 AM | Report abuse

Just wanted to remind the Democrats, any thing passed by reconciliation can be "undone" by reconciliation when the other party attains 51 and 218 numbers.

Posted by: jjeleven | February 19, 2010 11:30 AM | Report abuse

Please, no more messaging! No more talking point campaigns!
Obama is the most political, media manipulating leader I have ever experienced, taking power by controlling the "media cycle" and the "narrative" to a degree never seen before.
Now he plans on spending the next year doubling down on his media dominated, messaging politics??
Please, Wa. Post, don't just run with his propaganda.
Please, no more of the constant campaign, the constant poll-tested phrases, the words that everyone wants to hear!

Posted by: johnL1 | February 19, 2010 11:01 AM | Report abuse

Guess Obama is going to try to get some "Spendulous Funds" to help Reid add on to his "CASA DEL ILLEGLAS" to care for his illegals!

Posted by: TexRancher | February 19, 2010 10:58 AM | Report abuse

If Obama really wanted to help Harry Reid, Obama would be heading east, not west.

Posted by: JCM-51 | February 19, 2010 9:35 AM | Report abuse

I understand the White House wants to keep as many Democratic seats as possible, but wouldn't it be best for the president to stay as far away from Harry Reid as possible?

Posted by: parkerfl1 | February 19, 2010 8:22 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company