Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Excerpts from Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.)

"Now, last year I used my time during these hearings to highlight what I think is one of the most serious threats to our Constitution and to the rights it guarantees to the American people, the activism of the Roberts court. I noted that for years conservatives running for the Senate have made it almost an article of faith that they won't vote for activist judges who make law from the bench. And when asked to name a model justice, they would often cite Justice Thomas, who I noted has voted to overturn more federal laws than Justice Stevens and Justice Breyer combined.

In recent campaign cycles, you would also hear the name of Justice Roberts. Well, I think we've established very convincingly, we did during the Sotomayor hearing, that there is such a thing as judicial activism. There is such a thing as legislating from the bench. And it is practiced repeatedly by the Roberts court, and it has cut in only one direction, in favor of powerful corporate interests and against the rights of individual Americans. "

"So here is my point, General Kagan. Citizens United isn't just about election law. It isn't just about campaign finance law. It's about seat belts. It's about clean air and clean water. It's about energy policy and the rights of workers and investors. It's about health care. It's about our ability to pass laws that protect the American people even if it hurts the corporate bottom line.

As Justice Stevens said, it's about our need to prevent corporations from undermining self-government.

But I think you know that."

"General Kagan, you've shown remarkable skill as a lawyer for our government and remarkable candor as one of its critics -- say, for example, about Supreme Court confirmation hearings. I like that. And I want to see that legal skill in action, and I want to see if you might continue the work of Justice Stevens. "

By Emi Kolawole  |  June 28, 2010; 4:23 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Excerpts for Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)
Next: Excerpts from Sen. Ted Kaufman (D-Del.)


I beg to differ: Franken may make a joke, but he is No joke.

On the abortion issue, although I would never consider one myself in my younger years, I have a very strong feeling that those who oppose abortion on their moral convictions are also trying to impose their religious convictions and interpretations on those who do not interpret things as they do. Does not our constitution grant us freedom FROM religion? And the free exercise of our own? To me, it does not allow me to cram my views down someone else's throat, and I do not want their's down mine!!!!

Posted by: kddel | June 29, 2010 2:29 PM | Report abuse

Hmm... sounds like you have an interesting take on what Franken had to say, and contributed mightily to the discussion of activist judges. Oh wait, that's the opposite of what happened...

Franken is right on the money that Republicans bellyache constantly about "activist judges" when it is the conservative justices who have proven most activist.

Posted by: crashinghero | June 29, 2010 12:47 PM | Report abuse

Ah yes! Al Franken, who never met an abortion he couldn't defend, or a tax he didn't love, is going to lecture the little people from his swamp of moral swill. This guy isn't a leader. He's a joke.

Posted by: roberttlopezz | June 28, 2010 9:56 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company