'Tea party' becomes just plain tea party -- what should we do with the quotes?
The high sheriffs of The Washington Post Stylebook have decreed: The Post will no longer use quotation marks when referring to the tea party. So where should that extra pair of quotation marks go? We're looking for a phrase or initiative related to Washington government and politics that most deserves quotation marks. Something like "political science" or "stimulus package"? Leave your suggestions in the comments.
By
44 Editor
| September 28, 2010; 9:41 AM ET
Categories:
44 The Obama Presidency
Save & Share:
Previous: Protester tackled at McCain debate
Next: Sarah Palin booed on 'Dancing With The Stars'? (VIDEO)
"Conservative Democrat"; "Prolife Democrat"
Posted by: mbecker9081 | September 30, 2010 10:19 AM | Report abuse
take "our country" back.
Posted by: hitpoints | September 29, 2010 12:34 PM | Report abuse
"defending the Constitution"
Posted by: hitpoints | September 29, 2010 12:31 PM | Report abuse
"president"
Posted by: rporter8555 | September 29, 2010 7:56 AM | Report abuse
"global warming"
Posted by: JBaustian | September 28, 2010 5:33 PM | Report abuse
"Second-Amendment remedies" -- what I mean is, never take the quotes OFF of that baby.
Posted by: hallosev2 | September 28, 2010 5:07 PM | Report abuse
"Pledge to America"
Posted by: kathycory | September 28, 2010 1:25 PM | Report abuse
I guess this is from the esteemed professors at Kaplan University.
Posted by: Cornell1984 | September 28, 2010 11:34 AM | Report abuse
"stylebook"
Posted by: pattypotter | September 28, 2010 11:24 AM | Report abuse
"stylebook"
Posted by: pattypotter | September 28, 2010 11:23 AM | Report abuse
"stylebook"
Posted by: pattypotter | September 28, 2010 11:23 AM | Report abuse
Follow Sharron Angle's lead and put them around the word "autism".
Posted by: laurlnhardy | September 28, 2010 10:11 AM | Report abuse


![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=95b7c4fb-882f-4842-81ec-8f48784b4460)










We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.
User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.