Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:07 PM ET, 01/14/2011

Nineteen senators back bipartisan State of the Union seating

By Felicia Sonmez

Updated: 3:15 p.m.

A plan that would have Republicans and Democrats sit side-by-side during this month's State of the Union address has picked up support from nearly one-fifth of the Senate as well as a handful of House members, including a top House Republican.

Seventeen senators have co-signed a letter drafted by Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) to congressional leaders urging them to back the idea of members of both parties sitting next to each other rather than at opposite ends of the House chamber during President Obama's Jan. 25 address.

Alaska Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski announced Friday that she is a "co-leader" of the letter. In addition to the 17 senators co-signing Udall's letter to leadership, Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), the third-ranking Senate Democrat, has also come out in favor of the plan.

Among the 17 senators co-signing Udall's letter are five Republicans -- Murkowski and Sens. John McCain (Ariz.), Olympia Snowe (Maine), Susan Collins (Maine) and Kelly Ayotte (N.H.) -- and 11 Democrats -- Sens. Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.), Ron Wyden (Ore.), Mark Begich (Alaska), Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Ben Nelson (Neb.), Mary Landrieu (La.), Jack Reed (R.I.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.) and Amy Klobuchar (Minn.). Connecticut Independent Sen. Joe Lieberman has also signed on.

The proposal has also picked up the support of eight House members, including House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) and House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.). McCarthy, the third-ranking House Republican, told reporters at a media briefing Friday morning at the House GOP's annual retreat in Baltimore that he planned to sit next to Hoyer during the president's address. Hoyer, the number-two House Democrat, came out in favor of the bipartisan seating plan Thursday.

Six House Democrats have signed onto the Udall letter, including Reps. Mike Michaud (Maine), Heath Shuler (N.C.), Mike Ross (Ark.), Jim Matheson (Utah), Chellie Pingree (Maine) and Sanford Bishop (Ga.). All but Pingree are conservative Blue Dog Democrats who voted for someone other than House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) for speaker last week. McCarthy and Hoyer have not co-signed because they are members of leadership.

The bipartisan seating plan was originally proposed by the centrist Democratic group Third Way in a letter to congressional leaders this week.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Thursday that the proposal deserves "serious consideration" and noted that he had spoken with Hoyer and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) about the plan.

Other congressional leaders, including House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio), House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.), Pelosi and McConnell have yet to weigh in on the seating issue. Asked Friday about the speaker's plans, Boehner spokesperson Michael Steel noted that "members can sit where they choose during the State of the Union."

Staff writer Paul Kane contributed to this report from Baltimore.

By Felicia Sonmez  | January 14, 2011; 1:07 PM ET
Categories:  44 The Obama Presidency  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: #RNCchair -- The Republican National Committee chair election
Next: Sens. McCain, Kyl propose bill to name courthouse after slain Judge Roll

Comments

The writer fails to note that congressmen have always been able to sit where they want. There is no assigned seating. I also notice its the usual RINO crew who is for this. They might as well sit w/Dems, they vote with them most of the time anyway.

Posted by: cajunkate | January 15, 2011 12:07 PM | Report abuse

As I told my two senators and congressman yesterday: I strongly disagree with the proposed silly symbolic gesture of the Congress and Senate fully mingling in a non-partisan way for the State of the Union. The American people need to be able to see exactly who supports obama's liberal agenda. Democrats and RINO's should not be allowed to hide amongst the rest of the congressional audience so they can applaud or wince basically without being observed.

Posted by: clayusmcret1 | January 15, 2011 9:11 AM | Report abuse

With all the due respect to the congressman from Ca., get bent. How stupid can you be? Just where on the bus did Obama have you seated?

Posted by: rrm231 | January 14, 2011 3:11 PM | Report abuse

With all the due respect to the congressman from Ca., get bent. How stupid can you be? Just where on the bus did Obama have you seated?

Posted by: rrm231 | January 14, 2011 3:10 PM | Report abuse

I'd like to see all of them sitting with their state delegations. This would certainly provide some structure to the idea and giver everyone a place to go. It would also mix the leaders in with the back benchers.

Posted by: sarabee | January 14, 2011 2:22 PM | Report abuse

Great! Good for McCarthy.

Posted by: jeffwacker | January 14, 2011 1:40 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company