Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 12:41 PM ET, 02/14/2011

Budget 2012: Food and Drug Administration

By Lyndsey Layton

Under the President's proposed 2012 budget, the Food and Drug Administration would get $2.7 billion, an increase of $147 million compared to the 2010 budget of 2.6 billion. The agency would get another estimated $1.6 billion in user fees paid by pharmaceutical, medical devices and tobacco companies, for a total proposed 2012 budget of $4.4 billion.

Much of the increase, about $100 million, would be used to implement the sweeping new food safety law approved by Congress last year that requires the FDA to increase inspections of food facilities, both domestic and foreign, among other things.

But that's not enough to meet all the requirements of the new law, which the Congressional Budget Office estimates will cost the government about $300 million a year over the next five years. In its budget, the Obama administration indicated it will try to make up the difference through user fees imposed on food companies, a move that would require congressional approval but seems likely to get a cool reception on Capitol Hill. When the food safety legislation was pending in the last Congress, the House approved a $500 registration fee for every food company but that provision was dropped by the Senate and never made it into the final legislation.

"This will put the issue clearly in front of Congress about whether it will fund this law," said Caroline Smith DeWaal, food safety director at the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "The president's budget is a good downpayment."

House Republicans have proposed cutting $241 million from the 2010 budget for FDA.

Budget 2012 analysis: Full list of agencies

By Lyndsey Layton  | February 14, 2011; 12:41 PM ET
Categories:  44 The Obama Presidency  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Budget 2012: Environment
Next: Budget 2012: Treasury Department

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company