Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 6:00 AM ET, 02/ 3/2011

Health care 1099 repeal amendment a gift to Stabenow

By Felicia Sonmez

Michigan Sen. Debbie Stabenow's re-election bid may have just gotten a little bit easier.

Stabenow, who faces a tough bid for a third term in 2012, on Wednesday was the sponsor of an amendment that represents the first legislative tweak to the national health care overhaul. While a full repeal of the health care law fell short in the Senate Wednesday evening, Stabenow's amendment, which would repeal the 1099 tax-reporting requirement for small businesses, sailed through on a bipartisan 81-to-17 vote.

Sponsoring the 1099 repeal amendment puts the Michigan Democrat in the position of being able to take credit for leading the charge against an unpopular provision of the health care overhaul that Democrats and Republicans alike have criticized as unduly burdening small business owners.

Worth noting, though, is that while the final 1099 repeal amendment that passed Wednesday had Stabenow's name on it, the actual measure was almost identical to one proposed earlier by Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.).

Johanns had tried twice in the past year to push through his own 1099 repeal measure, once in September by attaching it to a small-business bill and again in November through an amendment to a food-safety bill.

Both efforts came up short. But after President Obama mentioned 1099 reform in his State of the Union address last week, things turned quickly in Johanns' favor, and his Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act soon garnered 61 co-sponsors, among them 16 Democrats -- including Stabenow.

Democrats retain control the Senate, so when it came time to schedule Wednesday's votes, it just so happened that a Democratic-led measure bearing similarities to Johanns' was the one that came up for a vote -- something Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) noted in remarks on the Senate floor.

Recent polling and the results of the November midterms suggest that Stabenow will need all the help she can get.

Michigan Democrats lost two House seats and the governor's mansion in November. A Detroit News poll last month showed that only 23 percent of Michigan voters would vote to re-elect Stabenow in 2012, while another survey by Republican-leaning pollster Wilson Research Strategies showed the Democrat below the 50-percent mark in general-election match-ups with two potential rivals, former state Secretary of State Terri Lynn Land (R) and former Rep. Pete Hoekstra (R).

Ahead of Wednesday's vote, Stabenow spokesperson Cullen Schwarz said that Stabenow was "glad" that Johanns also supported 1099 repeal and noted that she and her supporters believed that her version was best because it exempts the Social Security Administration from potential cuts as a way to pay for repeal.

Asked Wednesday evening about the Democratic move, Johanns acknowledged that "it really is the same amendment" but said that he was "actually kind of flattered" by the maneuver.

"I think my friends on the other side of the aisle saw that the handwriting was on the wall," Johanns said. "They couldn't let the train leave the station, if you will. And so, Senator Stabenow, for whatever reason, was picked to kind of go to the floor and call up really my amendment. But I was very, very happy to vote for my amendment and vote 'yes' and see 81 votes for it, whether it had her name on it or my name on it."

By Felicia Sonmez  | February 3, 2011; 6:00 AM ET
Categories:  44 The Obama Presidency  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Senate defeats Republican-led health-care repeal effort
Next: John McCain responds to Rumsfeld memoir: 'Thank God he was relieved of his duties' (video)

Comments

Politics as usual.

Stabenow, a member of the very Senate Finance Committee that wrote the 1099 requirement into the Health Care Law is now trying to take credit for its repeal.

That is how DC works now. That is why we need to vote out the established politicians; that is why we need term limits.

Let's hope her constituents see behind this - lets hope her opponent in 2012 repeats this and repeats this until the folks get it.

This was not her doing what was in the best interests of the people - this was her doing what was in HER best interests.

Posted by: LMW6 | February 4, 2011 10:01 AM | Report abuse

Americans need to remember how the Democrats forced this HC bill down our throats and quickly left town. Most of them hadn't read the bill and most probably still don't know what's in the bill. One thing that those with high medical expenses will find out is that the first 7.5% of AGI has been raised to 10%. Based on our personal situation, this will cost us approximately an additional $600 in taxes. So much for "those making under $250K will not see your taxes increased one dime". These politicians tout that the marginal tax rates didn't go up but there are plenty of ways to raise your taxes by tinkering with deductions. They are liars and thieves.

Posted by: Jackets | February 4, 2011 9:46 AM | Report abuse

Like most democrats, she is a thief. She copied the repeal language word-for-word from the republicans and now attempts to take credit for it.

In fact Stabenow is responsible for the 1099 health care burden in the first place.

What a complete lowlife she is. . .

Posted by: fury60 | February 3, 2011 8:28 AM | Report abuse

This is political nonsense. The Dems blocked it when it was introduced by the Republicans but passed it and claim it as a great achievement when it was introduced by the Dems.

Posted by: bethg1841 | February 3, 2011 7:58 AM | Report abuse

I'm happy to see this provision pass. I think it has deeper implications. The fact that an amendment of such a basic nature is required so far ahead of the 2014 implementation date speaks loudly to the fact that our elected representatives passed a healthcare reform bill without full knowledge of what they were voting upon. Instead of praising them for taking this action, they should be chastised for passing the bill that necessitated this amendment. Of course, many were in the last election, and many still need to be.

Posted by: hndygad | February 3, 2011 6:39 AM | Report abuse

I'm happy to see this provision pass. I think it has deeper implications. The fact that an amendment of such a basic nature is required so far ahead of the 2014 implementation date speaks loudly to the fact that our elected representatives passed a healthcare reform bill without full knowledge of what they were voting upon. Instead of praising them for taking this action, they should be chastised for passing the bill that necessitated this amendment. Of course, many were in the last election, and many still need to be.

Posted by: hndygad | February 3, 2011 6:38 AM | Report abuse

I'm happy to see this provision pass. I think it has deeper implications. The fact that an amendment of such a basic nature is required so far ahead of the 2014 implementation date speaks loudly to the fact that ourelected representatives passed a healthcare reform bill without full knowledge of what they were voting upon. Instead of praising them for taking this action, they should be chastised for passing the bill that necessitated this amendment. Of course, many were in the last election, and many still need to be.

Posted by: hndygad | February 3, 2011 6:34 AM | Report abuse

I'm happy to see this provision pass. I think it has deeper implications. The fact that an amendment of such a basic nature is required so far ahead of the 2014 implementation date speaks loudly to the fact that ourelected representatives passed a healthcare reform bill without full knowledge of what they were voting upon. Instead of praising them for taking this action, they should be chastised for passing the bill that necessitated this amendment. Of course, many were in the last election, and many still need to be.

Posted by: hndygad | February 3, 2011 6:33 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company