Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 3:10 PM ET, 02/11/2011

House approves measure addressing federal regulations

By Felicia Sonmez

Updated: 4:40 p.m.

The House voted overwhelmingly Friday in favor of a bill to rein in federal regulations, capping off a nine-and-a-half-hour debate.

The measure, which directs 10 House committees to review whether federal regulations are impeding job growth, passed on a vote of 391 to 28, with 14 members not voting. All Republicans present voted in favor of the measure, as did 153 Democrats, including all members of the Democratic leadership. Twenty-eight Democrats, mostly liberal members, voted "no."

Many Democrats had assailed the measure as unnecessary and argued that the time spent debating it could have been better used working toward a jobs bill. A number of Democrats, including House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), highlighted the benefits of regulation, noting that government rules are necessary to protect consumers and workers.

"We swore that we would protect Americans, and that's what this is all about," Cummings said during the floor debate, arguing that some of the plus points of regulations include "the benefit of not seeing a baby strangled in a crib" and the benefit of being assured that food that is not contaminated.

California Republican Rep. Darrell Issa, chairman of the Oversight Committee, later charged that Cummings was unfairly accusing the entire Republican Party of wanting to roll back regulations that protect children and others.

"I think we're bigger than those accusations," Issa said on the House floor.

The debate kept lawmakers in the chamber until 10 p.m. Thursday, only to resume less than 12 hours later.

Ultimately, most Democrats voted for the bill, as a rejection could have been interpreted as a vote against a job creation measure.

"I don't object to this resolution instructing committees to do what they should already be doing," House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said in his floor speech. "But after this resolution is passed, I urge my colleagues to return to the real work of creating jobs."

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's (R-Va.) office cast the vote as a sign that Democratic leaders had joined House Republicans in their cut-and-grow agenda.

"For past month Leader Pelosi, Whip Hoyer, and Assistant Leader Clyburn have claimed the Republican Agenda doesn't do anything to promote job creation, but today that apparently all changed," Cantor's office said in a statement. "The Democrat Leadership and an overwhelming majority of their caucus (153 Dems in all) joined the Cut and Grow Agenda and voted to investigate and possibly eliminate the very onerous regulation Democrats spent the previous two years passing."

Friday's vote came one day after Issa chaired an Oversight Committee hearing at which business leaders took aim at regulations that they said stand in the way of job growth.

President Obama last month issued an executive order calling on federal agencies to review their existing regulations and laying out a set of principles for any new rules adopted.

By Felicia Sonmez  | February 11, 2011; 3:10 PM ET
Categories:  44 The Obama Presidency  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Hosni Mubarak resigns: Reactions from Capitol Hill
Next: Democrats, Republicans spar over possibility of government shutdown


What better way to increase your popularity ratings than spending valuable time "reviewing" everything.

Posted by: 82ndairborne | February 12, 2011 1:18 PM | Report abuse

I wish our Govt would give serious consideration to legalizing marijuana; along with just getting rid of the DEA. It is costing us billions of dollars each year enforcing a law that I think we the people would legalize given the chance to vote nationwide on it. That money could be used in our schools, for fight real crimes, taking care of the elderly, rebuilding our infrastructure. It just makes no sense at all to continue this incredible waste of taxpayer dollars. Besides that, it is just plain wrong to arrest someone for doing something that is hurting noone - regardless of the $$$.

Posted by: Don46 | February 12, 2011 1:09 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company