Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 11:18 AM ET, 02/16/2011

Labor's Richard Trumka, Chamber's Tom Donohue appear together to plead for infrastructure spending

By Felicia Sonmez

Two longtime adversaries appeared together at a Senate committee hearing Wednesday morning to deliver a message to Congress: invest more in America's infrastructure.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka and U.S. Chamber of Commerce President Thomas J. Donohue were set to testify Wednesday before the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. The appearance came weeks after the two leaders released a joint statement following President Obama's State of the Union address praising the president's call for greater infrastructure spending.

Committee Chairman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) tossed a coin to see who would speak first; Trumka, who had called heads, won. Both he and Donohue, who were sitting side-by-side at Wednesday's hearing, made light of the fact that their joint appearance was a rare one.

"The fact that Tom Donohue and I appear before you today does not mean that hell has frozen over or that unicorns are roaming the land," Trumka said, to laughter from the senators on the panel. He noted that he and Donohue "have agreed to sit down and talk about ways that we can help U.S. manufacturing."

Donohue - who noted that he and Trumka were "the oddest couple since Felix and Oscar" - urged lawmakers not to embrace the status quo on infrastructure spending. He emphasized that while there is disagreement on how to pay for infrastructure investments, such spending is essential to economic stability and job growth.

"There needs to be a vigorous dialogue on funding and financing, but first we have to agree on the direction in which we're going," Donohue said. "Everyone needs to keep an open mind. ... We've got to avoid cutting off our nose to spite our face."

President Obama's fiscal year 2012 budget proposal, announced on Monday, calls for $128 billion on transportation spending, a 68 percent increase over the projected spending for the current fiscal year. The $128 billion would be the first installment in a six-year, $556 billion plan that would also include $30 billion in spending on a new National Infrastructure Bank and $53 billion on high-speed and intercity rail.

High-speed rail is one area of infrastructure spending to which House Republicans remain opposed; their proposed resolution funding the federal government for the rest of the current fiscal year would cut $1 billion from high-speed rail compared to Obama's 2011 budget request.

Senators on the panel largely were in agreement Wednesday on the need for investment in national infrastructure.

"Election season comes soon enough, and now we have an obligation to set all that aside and work together for our people, for jobs and for our future," Boxer said.

Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the ranking Republican on the committee, noted that he and Boxer are on opposite ends of the ideological spectrum but agree on the need for infrastructure spending. He faulted Obama for not specifying how his $556 billion proposal would be paid for and criticized the administration's previous spending on infrastructure, noting that only three percent of the economic stimulus went to roads, construction and infrastructure.

"The money that's been out there is not being directed in the right places," Inhofe said.

Vermont Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders was one of several lawmakers on the panel who compared the U.S. to China, noting that America spends 2.4 percent of its GDP in infrastructure while China invests nearly four times that much, or 9 percent.

"We have situations where trains go from Location A to Location B in a slower time than they did fifty years ago," Sanders said. "We're moving backwards, and the Chinese are building dozens of high-speed rails."

Trumka and Donohue's testimony Wednesday echoed their joint statement after the State of the Union, in which they pushed for greater infrastructure spending as a means of creating new jobs and boosting America's global competitiveness.

"Whether it is building roads, bridges, high-speed broadband, energy systems and schools, these projects not only create jobs and demand for businesses, they are an investment in building the modern infrastructure our country needs to compete in a global economy," the January statement read.

By Felicia Sonmez  | February 16, 2011; 11:18 AM ET
Categories:  44 The Obama Presidency  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Senate passes short-term extension of Patriot Act provisions
Next: Eric Cantor: House debate on government funding bill could stretch past Thursday


Look who is wanting to borrow from China...go ahead as treason, but the Preppers Depression is the millions of Americans who took to the streets last summer, who will just go on vacation until it all melts down.
No, meant No.
Cut and balance or the people plan to quit.

Posted by: dottydo | February 16, 2011 7:26 PM | Report abuse

"The money that's been out there is not being directed in the right places," Inhofe said.

Imagine that.

Two years ago, Obama tried to put a lot more of the stimulus money into infrastructure investment, but Republican legislators, including Inhofe, rejected infrastructure spending, in favor of more tax cuts.

It is absolutely formulaic to follow a fight to reject infrastructure spending with a dununciation of its absence, if you're a Republican. It's also hyppcritical to the point that it may be evidence of dementia, but it's a textbook Republican political tactic.

Posted by: lonquest | February 16, 2011 4:23 PM | Report abuse

I've got news for Orange Boner and the extremist Republican party:

Now that you have some actual power again (the House) you won't be able to get away with spending all of your time throwing verbal bombs at the Dems, going golfing and then hitting the DC cocktail circuit at night every day.

You either CREATE JOBS or you will be gone in 2012 so fast that your heads will spin!

Chop chop Repugs!

You've got two years!

Time's a wastin'!


Posted by: DrainYou | February 16, 2011 3:21 PM | Report abuse

These two can plead all they want, but America does Not have the money. Unfortunately, Obama blew $1 Trillion already that he said WAS going to infrastructure, but it never did. Too bad, there are no more funds available thanks to the wastrels in the White House and the Dems on Capitol Hill.

Posted by: Realist201 | February 16, 2011 1:17 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company