Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 2:43 PM ET, 12/20/2010

Brickskeller memories: An '80s Sietsema review

By Tim Carman
brickskeller vintage_opt.jpg The Brick was a model of inconsistency. (Craig Herndon/The Washington Post)

This is the fourth and final installment of our retrospective look at the Brickskeller. You can also read parts one, two, and three.

The Dave and Diane Alexander era of the Brickskeller officially came to a close on Saturday, and not a moment too soon for some, who think the saloon has needed a change for a long time.

For, like, 23 years, to judge by this 1987 review by Tom Sietsema (in PDF form). If someone read Tom's review to you, without mentioning the date, you'd be hard-pressed to think it was penned more than two decades ago. Consider Tom's summation paragraph on the Brick:

"If the food is third rate, the setting is pure pub, an underground warren of low-ceilinged dining rooms, festively decorated with -- what else? -- beer cans and beer bottles. Several jukeboxes near the bar add to the scene. In all, it is everything you'd expect a tavern to look like. And perhaps the food tastes worse than you'd expect. Beyond beer, it's eat at your own risk."

Incidentally, there was no word in the review about whether Tom had to go with his second or third or fourth choice from the beer menu. Maybe that frustration developed later.

By Tim Carman  | December 20, 2010; 2:43 PM ET
Categories:  Beer  | Tags:  The Brickskeller, Tim Carman, Tom Sietsema  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Project Downscale: Eggplant Parmigiana

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company