Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Petition Drive Begins

Governor

Maryland Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. began moving forward yesterday with a petition drive aimed at undoing plans for early voting in the fall elections.

The governor's 2006 campaign team, led by campaign manager Bo Harmon, began handing out petitions drawn up along standards set by the attorney general's office. The team is working under the name Marylanders for Fair Elections.

The petition drive, if successful, would ask the state's voters to overturn a 2005 law that allows voting during the week leading up to Election Day and a 2006 law that identifies where polling places will be and orders that they stay open 13 hours a day.

Petitioning legislation onto the ballot has occurred rarely in Maryland. For Ehrlich (R) to prevail, his campaign team would have to collect 51,185 valid signatures by June 30 and overcome a recent legal opinion by the attorney general's office, which asserted that the petition drive needed to occur last year to get on the ballot this fall.
Ehrlich's stated objection to early voting is that it invites fraud.

But Democrats point out that Ehrlich has much to fear from a voting schedule designed to drive up turnout. In a state where Democrats have nearly twice as many voters on the rolls as Republicans, any move to increase Election Day (or election week) turnout probably will work against the governor.

With each party eager for an edge and the law murky about whether a successful petition drive would suspend plans for early voting this year, officials are expecting the matter to wind up in court.

"There's going to be a lawsuit from somebody no matter what happens," said Robert A. Zarnoch, the assistant attorney general who advises the legislature on legal matters.

One complicating factor is that much of the responsibility for approving petitions and placing measures on the ballot falls to Secretary of State Mary D. Kane, who happens to be married to GOP Chairman John Kane.
That fact alone distresses Democrats.

"This is a Republican-initiated venture, so if this lands on the desk of the secretary of state, I would expect her to recuse herself," said House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel). "I mean, considering who she's married to, I would think that would only be proper."

Mary Kane did not respond to a message left in her office on Friday.

Matt Mosk

By Phyllis Jordan  |  April 30, 2006; 2:06 PM ET
Categories:  Governor  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: A Running Mate for Duncan
Next: It's Official: It's Simms

Comments

In most states, early voting has benefited Republicans.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 1, 2006 12:45 PM | Report abuse

In most states, early voting has benefited Republicans.

Posted by: Anonymous | May 1, 2006 12:46 PM | Report abuse

well, che, as insight as you may believe your blanket copy-and-paste jobs may be on these washingtonpost.com blogs, they simply are not relevant in any way to this (and for the most part, any other) discussion taking place. your posted comments do nothing to foster additional discussion, and with luck, one day washingtonpost.com will figure out how to stop your trolling.

now to get on topic, Ehrlich's real opposition to early voting is simple politics: early voting will mean higher turn-out. higher turn-out in a state where democrats outnumber registered republicans 2-to-1 doesn't bode well for a republican governor already behind to the democrat frontrunner (o'malley). this should be spun as the governor being against higher turn-out and nothing more.

Posted by: corbett | May 3, 2006 3:17 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company