Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Ethics Complaint Filed

There was more fallout today from news about the activities of Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s personal lawyer, David Hamilton, who has been helping his legal clients set up meetings with the governor and other state officials in Annapolis but has not registered as a lobbyist.

A group of citizens east of Baltimore who are fighting efforts to build a liquid natural gas terminal (LNG) at an abandoned shipyard have filed a formal complaint with the state ethics commission against Hamilton. One of Hamilton's clients is the firm that plans to build the facility, and Hamilton joined his client in meetings with two lawmakers about getting the state's assistance.

"It has been reported that David Hamilton was retained as Counsel for Barletta Willis LLC to obtain state funds for dredging at the Sparrows Point Shipyard and to facilitate a planned LNG import terminal at that site. It has also been reported that Mr. Hamilton has had meetings about these projects with legislators and other State of Maryland officials, including Sen. Norman R. Stone, Jr. (D-Baltimore County), who represents the community, and Sen. Edward J. Kasemeyer (D-Baltimore County), who oversees the capital budget," wrote Bart S. Fisher, who is the lawyer for the group, which calls itself the LNG Opposition Team, in his letter to the ethics commission.

"Following those meetings a grant of $150,000 was in fact received by SPS Limited Partnership for the purpose of dredging at the Sparrows Point Shipyard site, and appears in the FY 2007 Maryland Executive Budget," Fisher wrote, adding "Mr. Hamilton's actions make a mockery of the Maryland lobbying rules and should not be countenanced."

Hamilton did not return messages left at his office and on his cell phone. But he has provided The Post with a lengthy statement in which he explains how he functions as a lawyer, not a lobbyist --and suggests that his clients retain Annapolis lobbyist Bill Pitcher for their lobbying needs.

"In meetings that we have attended with members of the Executive Branch or the Legislative Branch, Bill engages in the sort of dialogue that meets the definition of lobbying under the statute." Hamilton wrote. " I am there to explain legal issues surrounding the client. I gave you the example of Barletta, which we represent jointly, and Bill and I met with members of the General Assembly. Bill addressed budgetary requests, and I explained Barletta's status in conjunction with an EPA consent decree and its relationship to the State's Brownfields program. In all matters in which I have worked with Bill or another lobbyist, we have taken great care to avoid the appearance of impropriety and to abide by all rules that govern what we do or have done."

The governor's office has not commented on the matter, other than to make this brief statement: "The governor and Dave have been friends for 24 years," said Henry Fawell, Ehrlich's spokesman. "The governor believes David has always conducted himself in an ethical manner."

By  |  May 25, 2006; 1:22 PM ET
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: O'Malley Camp Takes Off the Gloves
Next: Duncan and the Money from Saipan


This whole David Hamilton story is pretty lame. Looks like it's hit Ehrlich with everything they've got--even if their arguments don't make sense.

Is Dan Mote a registered lobbyist? Was Tim Daly? Was Aaron Kraus? How about UMBC's school president? How about their SGA president and past presidents? Right, no.

Posted by: Bryan | May 27, 2006 11:46 AM | Report abuse

Bryan, you r obsessed with defending this guy. Hamilton, runs gov relations for the firm, doesnt register as a lobbiest...instead peddles influence and raises money. Clear violation...Ehrlich's culture of corruption.

Posted by: Voter | May 29, 2006 10:56 PM | Report abuse

Still hiding behind an alias voter? Cmon, I know MOM staffers are posting here--why not post with you guys real names?

I think the whole Hamilton situation is silly. He hasn't been charged with anything and we're assuming that since he was present with a registered lobbyist that he was in fact lobbying.

Quite frankly I knew Dan Mote lobbied all the time for the University of Maryland while I was a student there and never once registered as a lobbyist, but there is no outrage about that.

This is just election year politiking--and it follows a trend of finding something to whine about: see the witch hunt committee that turned up nothing illegal and a committee whose legislation did not even come up for a vote despite Busch and Miller talking about how great this committee was.

Listen Voter, I'm impressed that the attacks on the Governor have moved past coin tosses, golf partners, and his hair--that's a step up for you guys and I'll give you credit, but you're still arguing things that are largely irrelevant.

Posted by: Bryan | May 30, 2006 3:21 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company