Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Cellphone Driving Ban in Doubt

A proposal passed narrowly by the Senate last week to prohibit the use of hand-held cellphones while driving in Maryland received a mixed reaction in the House of Delegates yesterday.

Following a hearing on the cellphone ban in the House Environmental Matters Committee, some committee leaders said they would fight to oppose the measure, signaling that its prospects for passage may be in jeopardy. The bill would have to pass the committee before full consideration on the House floor.

Still, other committee members support the proposal, including Del. Maggie L. McIntosh (D-Baltimore), the committee chairwoman, and said they believe momentum is building to pass the bill in the closing days of the legislative session. After considerable debate, the Senate voted 26 to 21 to pass the bill.

Under the proposal, driving while using a cellphone without a hands-free accessory would be a secondary offense, meaning a violator could be cited if pulled over for another traffic offense.

The bill's sponsor, Sen. Michael G. Lenett (D-Montgomery), testified before the House committee yesterday. He said many other states, as well as the District, have adopted similar laws.

"This is a growing trend that is becoming national and I don't know why Maryland would be so far behind," Lenett said.

McIntosh said last week that she will push hard for the bill's passage in her committee. But Del. James E. Malone Jr. (D-Baltimore County), the committee's vice chairman, said he thinks the committee will be divided on the issue.

Del. Barbara A. Frush (D-Prince George's), a leading committee member, said she will vote against the bill.

"I think people don't like government consistently interfering in their lives," Frush said. "In trying to protect people, we overprotect to the point that we're in the middle of everything we do."

But Virginia P. Clagett (D-Anne Arundel), another leading member, said she has long supported the cellphone ban.

"I don't know what is the year for it, but, you know, each year I try," Clagett said.

-- Philip Rucker

By Philip Rucker  |  March 25, 2008; 3:25 PM ET
Categories:  General Assembly  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: MoCo's District 4 Field is Official
Next: General Assembly: Legislation Status

Comments

Sorry, but what is kimerikas?

Jane.

Posted by: sweeta-ix | March 25, 2008 4:57 PM | Report abuse

Sorry, but what is kimerikas?

Jane.

Posted by: sweeta-ix | March 25, 2008 4:58 PM | Report abuse

Bad idea. Babies or children in a car can be much more distracting. What about a pulchritudinous sweetheart? Having a phone in your ear can be distracting too, blocking out such noises as sirens that alert the driver.

Posted by: Robin Ficker, Broker Robin Realty | March 25, 2008 6:35 PM | Report abuse

What am I missing in this debate? Why is Barbara Frush, my rep, and otherwise a" big government libril", agin this proposal?

I drive all around DC four days a week, yahkin with a buhd in ma ear. What alternative, if any, other than destruction, does Frush propose?

I hear people are agin the proposal, but see no rational explanation of their objections. If such people want to be described as "leaders" the time to step up is NOW! State your views.

Posted by: Count Bobulescu | March 27, 2008 1:18 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company