Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Pr. George's Officials Respond to Furloughs Decision

Prince George's County Council Chairperson Marilynn M. Bland (D-Clinton) weighed in this afternoon (sort of) on a bombshell federal court decision Tuesday which found the county's furloughs last fiscal year to be unconstitutional.

Bland said the council was "disappointed" by the ruling, which may force the county to repay $17 million in lost wages to 5,900 employees in the midst of an economic downturn. But she declined to delve into specifics, citing the ongoing legal battle.

Her statement:

"The Council is disappointed y the lawsuit filed by the unions regarding the furloughs, and the recent Court decision in that matter. The fiscal crisis plaguing our nation, the state of Maryland, and other jurisdictions, remains the greatest challenge confronting Prince George's County today. In the spirit of 'shared sacrifice,' we must all continue to pull together and do our part to weather this financial storm. Everyone must realize that in order to protect jobs and core services to our citizens, furloughs were instituted. Layoffs are a much less desirable alternative. It would be inappropriate to comment further, as an appeal will be filed, and this is a matter of ongoing litigation."

Meanwhile, County Executive Jack B. Johnson's office issued a slightly tweaked version of its original response to the ruling:

"President Obama has said we are in the midst of a deep economic crisis. As a result of this crisis, the county made a difficult decision to furlough its employees for 10 days, saving $17 million. Our decision, which was not taken lightly, was made to implement the furlough plan rather than lay off hundreds of employees.The court has substituted its judgment without acknowledging the economic challenges facing the country. To comply with the court's opinion will result in large numbers of layoffs and cuts in government services. In order to protect their jobs and the lives of employees and their families, as well as the residents of this county, we will be filing a prompt appeal to the Court's decision."

It's anyone's guess whether the ruling will be overturned. Meanwhile, unions everywhere are scrambling to see whether the judge's opinion can help them battle furloughs in other jurisdictions.

By Jonathan Mummolo  |  August 19, 2009; 6:25 PM ET
Categories:  Jonathan Mummolo , Prince George's County  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: End-of-Life Politics: The View From A Hospice
Next: First Click -- Maryland

Comments

What hypocrites. The county council and county executive think "In the spirit of shared sacrifice, we must all continue to pull together and do our part to weather this financial storm. They do fail to mention while they were violating contracts by furloughing employees including police, firefighters, and EMTs essentially giving them a pay cut. They voted themselves a raise and claimed they could not be furloghed because it violated a county charter. I guess they feel it is ok when it is everyone else just not themselves.

Posted by: armympwife72 | August 23, 2009 8:28 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company