Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Md. state employees in same-sex marriages get same rights as heterosexuals

same-sex.jpgState employees in Maryland can now sign up same-sex spouses as dependents, making them eligible to receive the same health care and other benefits afforded to husbands and wives of heterosexual state employees, according to Gov. Martin O'Malley's (D) office.

The change, made public Wednesday, means that O'Malley's administration has followed through in codifying a legal opinion issued in February by Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler.

In that opinion, Gansler overturned a previous attorney general, writing that there was nothing barring the state from recognizing valid same-sex unions performed elsewhere. In his role as Maryland's top legal adviser to state agencies, Gansler at the time also went one step further, saying that state agencies should begin granting married same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual ones.

The day Gansler released his opinion, O'Malley issued a statement saying his administration would be "guided" by the attorney general's opinion.

O'Malley has consistently voiced support for civil unions but stopped short of endorsing same-sex marriage. O'Malley's chief opponent in his reelection bid, former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. (R), has blasted the attorney general's decision, saying it flies in the face of state precedent not to recognize same-sex marriage.

A Washington Post poll conducted this month found that Marylanders are shifting toward a more positive opinion of same-sex marriage. Registered voters would now narrowly support a law to allow it, according to poll respondents. A clear majority of those polled -- 55 percent -- also said that if gay people get married in another state, those unions should be considered legal in Maryland; 38 percent say the state should not recognize them.

Under new rules governing Maryland's state employee benefits program, members of same-sex unions with a valid marriage certificate from another state or the District have until June 2 to enroll a spouse for coverage beginning July 1.

Political observers expect the move to prompt a legal challenge that could make it all the way to the state's highest court.

By Aaron C. Davis  |  May 19, 2010; 6:05 PM ET
Categories:  Aaron C. Davis  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: SEIU endorses Baker in Prince George's
Next: First Click, Maryland -- Bill signings wrap today

Comments

This is a positive step forward, but not far enough forward. What about the people who aren't state employees?

Posted by: FlexSF | May 19, 2010 8:20 PM | Report abuse

One thing is absolutely certain: If Bob Ehrlich is elected, there will be no step forward for anyone else and these benefits for State employees will surely be rescinded. Please don't take us back, Bob.

Posted by: hamsandwich | May 19, 2010 9:40 PM | Report abuse

It's time for full equality.
Onward, Joe Mustich,
Justice of the Peace,
Washington, Connecticut, USA.

Posted by: cornetmustich | May 19, 2010 11:32 PM | Report abuse

BAck about 2 yrs ago the state ct of appeals said that gays did not have a legal right to marry. One interesting thing is that 3 of the justices have been replaced. If there is a lawsuit it may, and hopefully will be different.

Its also about time that churches that try to impose their beliefs on others be held liable for damages and more. Someone calculated that marriage for a couple is worth about $400,000 over about a 50 year lifetime together. Multiply that by the number of gay people, and that is one hell of a big number.

Many catholic dioceces have been bankrupted by their " molesters R US" crimes. That could be just the tip of the iceberg of what they owe people for their other crimes, including violating the IRS code re "charitable" (anything but) organizations.

And add the other fundamentalist churches, eg the southern Baptists and other (anything but) christian churches.

Posted by: SJames6621 | May 21, 2010 3:35 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company