Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Anti-slots activists continue fight against casino

Anne Arundel slots.jpgNeighborhood activists vowed Tuesday to continue their fight against Maryland's largest planned slots casino, saying they would not be deterred by a judge's ruling last week that derailed a public vote on the Anne Arundel County project.

"We feel confident we're going to prevail on appeal," Rob Annicelli, president of Stop Slots at Arundel Mills, said at an early evening news conference. "This is a tremendous loss for voters."

Anne Arundel County Circuit Court Judge Ronald A. Silkworth ruled Friday that a planned referendum on zoning legislation for the casino was illegal because the zoning bill was part of an appropriation package. Under state law, spending measures cannot be decided upon by voters at the ballot box.

Annicelli's group, which disagrees with that interpretation, is part of a coalition that collected enough signatures to force a countywide vote on the zoning bill, which was approved by the Anne Arundel County Council in December. The majority of funding for the coalition's efforts has been provided by the Maryland Jockey Club, which favors slots at Laurel Park racetrack instead.

Cordish Cos., a Baltimore-based developer seeking to build a 4,750-machine slots casino adjacent to the mall, last week hailed Silkworth's ruling as a victory for taxpayers. About half of the state's slots proceeds are earmarked for education programs.

Speaking with reporters Tuesday, Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) said he understood the frustrations of the homeowners fighting the casino. In 2008, statewide voters authorized five slots locations, including one in Anne Arundel. The locations were not specified in the measure.

"I don't think most Anne Arundel County residents voted for slots thinking they would be at a mall, and I don't think most Anne Arundel County residents think they should be at a mall, and I don't say I blame them in that conclusion," O'Malley said, reiterating his view that if he "had his druthers," all of the slots sites would have been at race tracks.

O'Malley said he had not read the ruling preventing the zoning measure from going on the November ballot but said that "if local zoning decisions are allowed to go to referendum, I don't know why it wouldn't be" allowed, he said.

-- John Wagner and Aaron C. Davis

By John Wagner  |  June 29, 2010; 8:14 PM ET
Categories:  Aaron C. Davis , John Wagner , Slots  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Hanson hasn't made up his mind about County Council bid
Next: Ehrlich to announce running mate at 10 p.m.


MEDIA FAIL: "The majority of funding for the coalition's efforts has been provided by the Maryland Jockey Club" about ALL of the funding was provided by the Jockey Club who refused to pay the $30 million application the facts...if the "Club" had just paid the probably wouldn't be an issue...bankrupt Canadian company looking for a bailout...

Posted by: george_w_bush0 | June 29, 2010 11:03 PM | Report abuse

Penn National apparently now owns 49% of the racetrack in Laurel, not Magna.
PN already holds a license at another MD site.(only one company can have a license in the state at a time).

So, they cannot get another site license
if they become the owners of Laurel.

Rules, procedures and constitutional
law don't seem to matter anymore.

Why should anyone think the track will follow the rules and procedures if they get slots? Do the taxpayers and the gov't really want to give slots to an entity that manipulates the system instead of following the rules?

Bad habits are hard to break and will continue.

Posted by: RealityCheck29 | June 30, 2010 6:57 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company