Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

O'Malley suggests he would sign gay marriage bill

o'malley-tightcrop.JPGMaryland Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) on Thursday suggested that he would sign a bill supporting gay marriage if reelected and one passed the state's General Assembly, which has so far been reluctant to do so.

The comment by O'Malley on WTOP went slightly further than he had previously, and was his most direct public comment on gay marriage during his reelection bid. During his first term, O'Malley has consistently stopped short of endorsing same-sex marriage and said he favors civil unions.

O'Malley's remark came in response to a question from a caller on the station's "Ask the Governor" program about the future of gay marriage in Maryland.

"I don't have a crystal ball to predict how this goes," O'Malley said, "but I do know this: I know the people of our state well enough that for all of the differences and diversities of backgrounds and opinions, that all of us want to find a way to craft our laws in such a way that it treats people equally under the law."

O'Malley said he personally believes that allowing for civil unions would be the best way to reach a compromise in the legislature. But he added that "should the legislature find a way to reach that compromise in another way, I would sign a bill like that ... we need to find a way to support equal rights, and that is true when it comes to committed gay and lesbian couples and the unions in which they choose to enter and raise children and all the issues that go with that."

O'Malley spokesman Shaun Adamec cast the governor's comments as consistent with previous statements, saying the governor had said he would sign a gay marriage bill if and when it passes.

This year, there were enough votes on the House Judiciary Committee to send the question to the floor for a vote, but the committee chairman, Del. Joseph F. Vallario (D-Prince George's), did not bring the measure up for a vote. House Speaker Michael E. Busch (D-Anne Arundel) does not support it. He favors civil unions and considers marriage the purview of the church. In the Senate, led by longtime President Thomas V. Mike Miller Jr. (D-Calvert), lawmakers are traditionally more socially conservative than in the House.

Vallario faces a tough reelection battle, and Busch faces challengers but is widely expected to return as speaker.

O'Malley gave a nod to the changing legislature and recent polling that shows increasing acceptance of gay marriage among Maryland voters.

"I believe the civil unions was the way to go. It could be that public opinion and the opinion of a newly elected legislature will move beyond that and have another bill."

In February, Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler told state agencies to begin granting married same-sex couples from elsewhere the same rights as Maryland's heterosexual couples.

That move touched off a heated debate in the legislature, spawning bills to both legalize gay marriage and to ban it. Several evangelical pastors from predominantly black churches in Baltimore and Prince George's lobbied lawmakers to support a ban, which was never brought to a vote.

A Washington Post poll in May found that Maryland residents are shifting toward a more positive opinion of same-sex marriage. Registered voters now narrowly support a law to allow it.

The poll found that 46 percent overall favored legal same-sex marriage, 44 percent oppose it, and 10 percent have no opinion. Among registered voters, 48 percent are in favor and 43 percent are opposed.

In late 2007, an identical Post poll question found 44 percent in favor overall and 51 percent opposed.

Maryland's move away from a clear majority opposition to same-sex marriage -- and into a nearly equally split electorate -- mirrors national trends. The state's few openly gay lawmakers have said that they would push for a same-sex marriage bill next year.

Former governor Robert L. Ehrlich (R), O'Malley's likely opponent in the November election, has said he considers marriage as solely between a man and a woman.

By Aaron C. Davis  |  September 9, 2010; 12:35 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: First Click, Maryland -- It's getting nasty out there
Next: O'Malley (sort of) endorses Fenty

Comments

Great. So now there are govornors using the promise of gay rights to get elected? This will be another round of voting for the lesser of two evils. On the one hand you have an ex-governor who used the state police to spy on Maryland citizens. And the current governor who hasn't seen a tax increase he didn't like. Sure would be nice to have a visionary run for office. Someone with fresh ideas from the new millenium. Middle aged white people suck.

Posted by: madest | September 9, 2010 1:27 PM | Report abuse

"House Speaker Michael E. Busch does not support it. He favors civil unions and considers marriage the purview of the church."

Q: So why are non-religous heterosexuals allowed to legally marry? A: Because you don't have to be religious to get married, and you don't have to go to a church to get married.
Q: Why does the state grant marriage licenses, and not the church? A: Because the church does not have any legal authority over marriage. Marriage is a secular institution in the U.S.

Obviously, you don't need to pass an I.Q. test to become a politician. It took me 5 seconds to destroy Mr. Busch's inane argument.

Posted by: obtusegoose | September 9, 2010 2:53 PM | Report abuse

"Obviously, you don't need to pass an I.Q. test to become a politician. It took me 5 seconds to destroy Mr. Busch's inane argument."

Posted by: obtusegoose |
___________________________________________

Sorry little gerbil, not so fast on the arrogance. What is the function of the marriage license? To ratify a contract, as in dometic partnership agreement, thats what. The state should be getting out of the business of sanctioning marriage, which is discriminatory, not further into it.

That being said, it should be illegal for Martin O'Malley to be so hot. What does he do, dip his nead into a bucket of ice water every morning a la Paul Newman?

Gay marriage may be a false issue conjured up to keep gay consultants in billable hours and the right wing all crazy, but religion or not but a gay honeymoon night with Marty would be divine.

Posted by: SoCali | September 9, 2010 7:20 PM | Report abuse

Gov O'malley needs to take the lead. I'm not sure if he's just posturing, and assuming that it will be harder then ever to pass marriage for same sex couples after the election season.

Come on Marty - show your political gonads. Get a whole bunch of gay people really excited about supporting you, and you may well be Gov again.

If the gays sit out the election, well I guess there are plenty of places an ex gov can go.

If you're not an active part of the solution, you are part of the prblem.

And I hope you don't let your church of the molestation tyrannize you. the church that hid vile crimes against chidlren for decades if not centuries. Because the rot reaches all the way to the top

Posted by: SJames6621 | September 13, 2010 4:01 AM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company