Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Newcomer challenges Charles County register of wills

In Charles County, a political neophyte is challenging a longtime county government official who in recent years was accused of unethical behavior for allegedly misleading county commissioners.

Loraine Hennessy (D), 46, is challenging Susie C. Bowles (R) for the office of register of wills in Tuesday's general election. Bowles, 63, of Newburg has served in that post since 1990.

Hennessy is a mother of four children between ages 12 and 17. She and her family live in the La Plata area. She also works as a substitute teacher in county public schools. Her husband, William "Lou" Hennessy, is a District Court judge in Charles.

Hennessy's campaign for register of wills is her first foray into elective politics.

"The reason I got into this race is basically because of the ethics issue," Hennessy said. She was referring to a controversy over Bowles's 2006 appearance before the county commissioners in which she said she did not have a "retirement." At her request, the county commission voted to grant her a county pension that would have paid her as much as $75,000 a year (the post of register of wills pays more than $90,000 annually).

The vote upset some county employees and other registers of wills across the state, who said Bowles was getting an unfair benefit. In January 2007, the state comptroller's office wrote to county officials and the state attorney general requesting an investigation.

Officials learned that Bowles has in fact paid into the state pension plan for more than 10 years and is entitled to a state pension.

In April 2008, county commissioners voted unanimously to repeal the decision to grant Bowles a county pension and called on the Maryland State Ethics Commission to investigate the issue. At the time, Bowles apologized to the commissioners for "causing confusion" and said she never intended to mislead them or lie to them.

Bowles did not respond to a phone call. Her attorney declined to comment.

It could not be determined whether the state ethics commission initiated an investigation of the matter. A spokesman for the commission said it does not confirm the existence of any investigation.

Hennessy said Bowles is continuing to mislead voters in her reelection campaign by claiming she has had a perfect record of state audits. Hennessy pointed to a November 2009 state audit which found that Bowles's office "lacked adequate controls over collections and disbursements. For example, the office did not adequately segregate certain duties and, as a result, there was a lack of assurance that all collections and disbursements were properly processed and accounted for."

-- Ruben Castaneda

By Ruben Castaneda  | October 29, 2010; 3:58 PM ET
 
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Ehrlich makes direct appeal for votes in final ad
Next: Report: Kratovil, Harris ads aired 6,405 times in seven weeks

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company