Post-debate fact-checking gives different takes on O'Malley's spending
Even before The Washington Post debate began Thursday afternoon, the campaign of Gov. Martin O'Malley (D) distributed a bound booklet to reporters with the title: "Debate Fact Sheets." Under the heading of "O'Malley's Record of Fiscal Responsibility," the campaign credits O'Malley with cutting spending 3 percent during his term. During the debate, O'Malley said, "We've cut state spending more than any other governor has over a four-year period."
The 3 percent figure O'Malley uses refers to general fund spending. That's one way to look at the numbers. But look at it another way and the numbers tell a somewhat different story.
From 2007 to 2011, total appropriations increased 1.2 percent, according to a report from the Maryland Department of Legislative Services, and the operating budget increased 7.2 percent.
That's not a big number over a four-year period, but it is an increase -- not a decrease, as O'Malley's way of viewing the budget suggests.
"They all pick the numbers they like the best and they are all real numbers," said the state's chief legislative policy analyst, Warren G. Deschenaux.
In fact, by Deschenaux's calculations, general fund spending actually decreased by a greater percentage than O'Malley lists -- 7.5 percent over the four-year period.
| October 14, 2010; 2:17 PM ET
Categories: 2010 Elections, Fact-Checker, Maryland State Budget
Save & Share: Previous: Washington Post debate: What did you think?
Next: Excerpts: Post reporter John Wagner on governor's race, debate
Posted by: doesntmatter | October 14, 2010 3:52 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: cheverly1 | October 14, 2010 10:01 PM | Report abuse