Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 7:12 PM ET, 01/ 8/2011

New ethics measures sought in Prince George's

By Miranda S. Spivack

Prince George's County Executive Rushern L. Baker, III (D) is asking the Maryland General Assembly to approve two ethics measures to limit the ability of local lawmakers to seek campaign contributions from developers as the county seeks to shed its reputation as a place where businesses had to "pay to play."

The proposals, which mirror promises Baker made during his campaign, come as former County Executive Jack B. Johnson (D) and his wife, newly installed County Council member Leslie Johnson (D), face federal charges of destruction of evidence and evidence-tampering in a corruption probe. The Johnsons were overheard on a federal wiretap on Nov. 12 discussing ways to destroy a $100,000 check allegedly from a developer and to hide $79,600 in cash in Leslie Johnson's bra.

One of Baker's measures would restrict Prince George's County Council members' ability to accept campaign contributions from developers at the same time they are considering legislation that would directly affect developers. A second bill would limit the council members' ability to inject their views into pending development proposals unless a developer or a resident has asked for council intervention.

The measures would close a loophole that allows council members to vote on cases in which they have received contributions through a slate, an indirect way of receiving funds that otherwise are barred by law. Even though the county executive does not play a direct role in zoning matters, Baker's proposal also seeks to restrict the county executive's ability to collect campaign funds from a developer while an application is pending. A bill plugging the slate loophole also has been proposed by Dels. Dereck E. Davis and Justin Ross, Prince George's Democrats.

"These bills represent a balanced approach to address past bad practices," Baker said in a statement issued Saturday. "They are not an attempt to upset the balance of power between the executive and legislative branches."

The second bill would prohibit council members from seeking review of development site plan cases that are decided by the planning board when neither the developer nor a resident has appealed. The intent of this bill is to address prior instances of "pay to play" where council members have "called" up cases for the purpose of seeking concessions from developers, Baker's statement said.

By Miranda S. Spivack  | January 8, 2011; 7:12 PM ET
Categories:  Prince George's County  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Baker names three to Pr. Geo.'s integrity panel
Next: Nearly 1,400 state workers apply for Md. buyout

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company