In statement, Alston says she is prepared to vote on same-sex marriage bill
Del. Tiffany T. Alston (D-Prince George's) issued a statement early Wednesday morning saying she is now prepared to vote on Maryland's same-sex marriage bill and will do so "based on what I believe to be right."
Alston is one of two co-sponsors of the bill who unexpectedly skipped a planned committee vote Tuesday morning, putting the fate of the high-profile legislation in peril.
In her statement, which The Post received by email at 1:50 a.m., Alston does not explicitly say how she will vote but seems to imply she will vote in favor of the legislation "if and when" the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee calls a vote.
"From the beginning of my campaign, I have told the people that elected me that I personally supported the same sex couple's right to marry," Alston says in the statement. "I believe all people should be treated equally regardless of their sexual orientation."
She also says she promised to listen to the views of her constituents and that she felt on Tuesday morning that she wanted "a little more time to weigh my final decision."
Alston says her duty as a lawmaker is "compounded when your personal religious beliefs are contrary to what you believe to be fundamentally right for society."
Alston's complete statement is below.
For Immediate Release
Delegate Tiffany T. Alston, Esq.
The same sex marriage debate is a very contentious and controversial issue that cuts to the core of people's religious belief and people's fundamental right to the pursuit of happiness. From the beginning of my campaign I have told the people that elected me that I personally supported the same sex couple's right to marry. I believe all people should be treated equally regardless of their sexual orientation. I also told my constituents that I would listen to their concerns and take them into consideration. As such, I have been weighing the diverse and diametrically opposed feedback from my constituents and the citizens of the Great State of Maryland.
On Tuesday, March 1, 2011, as others members of the committee came forward to express their concerns and reservations, I too shared my interest in having a little more time to weigh my final decision. Marriage is not an institution that should not be entered into lightly nor is the decision to create a public policy shift surrounding marriage. There are several fundamental rights that shape this debate: a fundamental freedom to express yourself; a fundamental right to pursue happiness; and just as important if not more important a fundamental right to religious freedom. I believe that one person's fundamental right(s) end where another person's right(s) began. As a law maker it is my duty and privilege to serve the people and try to find balance and equity where inequity exists. This duty is compounded when your personal religious belief are contrary to what you believe to be fundamentally right for society.
Accordingly, I have resolved that if and when the chairman calls the vote I will be ready to vote based on what I believe to be right. In time the people of Maryland will also have the opportunity to vote on what they each believe is the correct direction for our State to take. In the interim I hope and pray that you will all respect my vote although you may not agree with it. Thank you all for the privilege to serve as your Delegate.
| March 2, 2011; 6:10 AM ET
Categories: General Assembly, John Wagner, Same-Sex Marriage
Save & Share: Previous: Md. Republicans propose "alternate" budget
Next: O'Malley concedes controversial septic ban unlikely this year
Posted by: wewintheylose1 | March 2, 2011 8:45 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: VikingRider | March 2, 2011 9:47 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: jckdoors | March 2, 2011 10:38 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: pundito | March 2, 2011 10:46 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Orsalia | March 2, 2011 11:40 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: Orsalia | March 2, 2011 11:44 AM | Report abuse