Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 6:49 PM ET, 03/ 7/2011

No objections raised as Judge O'Malley appears before Md. Senate panel

By John Wagner

The Maryland Senate panel charged with evaluating the fitness of the governor's nominees tends to treat most who come before it pretty gently. On Monday, it made no exception for the governor's wife.

Members of the Executive Nominations Committee had nothing but kind words for Catherine Curran O'Malley as she appeared for consideration to a second 10-year term as a district court judge in Baltimore.

Sen. Dolores G. Kelley (D-Baltimore County), the panel's chairwoman, noted that the committee "might be concerned" about the first lady's nomination by her husband, Gov. Martin O'Malley (D), if not for the fact that a previous governor, Parris N. Glendening (D), first successfully put her name forward for the job 10 years ago.

"I look forward to you going forward on the bench," Kelley said.

Sen. Nathaniel J. McFadden (D-Baltimore), who represents the area where the O'Malleys lived in Baltimore before moving to Annapolis, formally introduced the first lady to the committee, saying hers was "a wonderful appointment because of her expertise."

No one offered a dissenting opinion.

Still, the nomination has generated some controversy. On Saturday, Alex X. Mooney, the Maryland Republican Party chairman, cited it as a part of an alleged pattern of nepotism under O'Malley. Mooney's swipe was prompted by the election of Peter O'Malley, the governor's brother and a well-established political operative, as chairman of the Maryland Democratic Party.

In brief remarks to the Senate committee Monday, Judge O'Malley made mention of the controversy and reminded the panel of her appointment 10 years ago by Glendening.

"This is really not a nepotism sort of appointment at all," she said.

The full Senate is expected to approve her nomination later this week.

By John Wagner  | March 7, 2011; 6:49 PM ET
Categories:  Governor, John Wagner  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Leggett proposes 5-cent bag tax for Montgomery County
Next: Update: Same-sex bill debate postponed

Comments


The world does not realize this is a conflict of interest, just as in the case of Jack B. Johnson and his judge wife, Leslie.

If people are so ignorant, then more power to them; their children will be very proud.

Posted by: polecatx1 | March 7, 2011 11:04 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company