Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity
Posted at 1:10 PM ET, 03/11/2011

Prince George's legislative delegation approves ethics package

By Miranda S. Spivack

The Prince George's House delegation Friday took a key vote in support of an ethics package that would limit the County Council's review of development deals, ban credit cards for county employees, and strengthen the county's ethics commission.

The measure, which reflects a compromise between County Executive Rushern L. Baker III (D) and the County Council, was approved on a voice vote but could still be amended next week.

A similar bill was approved earlier this month in the county's state Senate delegation. Separate bills to restrict developers' political contributions still await county House members' action.

The action comes as former Prince George's county executive Jack Johnson faces federal corruption charges.

A 31-page indictment filed in U.S. District Court in Greenbelt alleges that Johnson traded business permits, millions in grant funding and other favors for airline tickets, rounds of golf and about $200,000 in cash. He has denied wrongdoing.

Del. Aisha Braveboy (D-Prince George's), who chairs the panel that brought the bill to the full delegation, said the measure offers developers and residents a firm timetable for council review and creates more transparency, while still allowing residents and council members to press developers for community amenities and concessions.

The bill gives the County Council a maximum of 205 days to review and alter decisions by the county's planning commission, whose five members are appointed by the county executive. Initially, Baker wanted to strip the council of any review power over developments approved by the planning commission.

A separate ethics review panel he appointed, chaired by former Baltimore Mayor Kurt Schmoke (D), is conducting an examination of county ethics policies.

Lisa Jackson, Baker's chief lobbyist in Annapolis, told the delegation the bill "is a very meaningful step."

"We worked really long and hard and we focused on fixing a piece of the process that was essentially open for abuse," she said. "We really moved the ball forward."

Amendments are still likely from Del. Barbara Frush (D-Prince George's) and Del. Jolene Ivey (D-Prince George's), both of whom said Friday the ethics provisions could be further strengthened, and are making proposals that more closely mirror Baker's original plan.

By Miranda S. Spivack  | March 11, 2011; 1:10 PM ET
Categories:  Miranda Spivack, Prince George's County  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Debate begins ahead of Maryland same-sex marriage vote
Next: Maryland House kills same-sex marriage bill for this year

No comments have been posted to this entry.

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company