Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Posted at 9:30 AM ET, 10/ 4/2010

How to make schools safer for gay students

By Valerie Strauss

My guest is Kevin G. Welner, professor of education policy and program evaluation in the School of Education at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and director of the National Education Policy Center. He can be reached at

By Kevin G. Welner
The past several weeks have seen the suicides of at least four American teenage students (two just 13 years old) who were harassed and bullied because they were, or were thought to be, gay. Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) students face a unique set of safety concerns each day. Over 85% report being harassed because of their sexual or gender identity, and over 20% report being physically attacked. The suicide rate for LGBT students continues to be 3-4 times higher than that of their straight counterparts.

School environments can be truly dangerous, and tragedies like those we’ve witnessed over the past month have become painfully foreseeable. Until school environments are made safe for LGBT students, we will predictably see a new series of suicides each fall as tormented students return to school and to their bullies.

That’s why the National Education Policy Center and its partners asked two experts to come up with clear policy recommendations to address these safety concerns.

The result is a policy brief and model code language released this past week at an event held at the National Education Association (NEA) headquarters in Washington DC: Safe at School: Addressing the School Environment and LGBT Safety through Policy and Legislation, written by Stuart Biegel and Sheila James Kuehl, and co-sponsored by the UCLA Williams Institute and with funding from the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice.

The policy brief explains the research about school safety, offers concrete recommendations that follow from the research, and then presents model statutory code language that implements the recommendations and that can be adopted by state legislators wanting to address these safety issues.

Professor Biegel said something to me that I included in our press release and that is worth repeating here: “In this area, educators are not required to change their personal values or religious beliefs. However, all students must be treated with equal dignity and equal respect by school officials, both under the law and as a matter of morality and common decency.”

Below, I summarize the brief, but I hope readers will click through and read the whole thing. It’s available online at

The brief documents, among other things:

• Recurring examples of traumatic peer mistreatment, often with faculty complicity.

• The resulting harm to the academic achievement and aspirations of LGBT students.

• Lives lost, both directly through assaults and indirectly through suicide.

The brief also presents evidence of structural and institutional failures such as:

• Failure to recognize that LGBT educators can play valuable, positive roles.

• Failure to address the persistent overt homophobia in many school sports programs.

• Misuse of the special education system, which further exacerbates LGBT mistreatment.

• Minimal coverage of LGBT issues in many teacher-education and professional development programs.

The recommendations from Biegel and Kuehl include:

• Adopt proactive school climate initiatives that demonstrate a commitment to inclusive policies and shared values within our pluralistic society.

• End discriminatory disciplinary practices and the inappropriate referral of LGBT students to special education.

• Implement LGBT-specific programs or activities at individual school sites, which may include safe zones, gay-straight alliances, and suicide prevention programs.

• Develop and implement LGBT-related professional development, locally determined and agreed upon by faculty and staff, for all school-site personnel.

• Align classroom pedagogy with shared values and respect for differences.

• Include age-appropriate LGBT-related content in the curriculum.

• Involve key members of campus athletic programs in LGBT-related initiatives.

• Make it clear that homophobic comments and actions by coaches and student athletes are completely unacceptable.

• Encourage student athletes to participate in targeted programs such as initiatives addressing bullying and hate violence, as well as gay-straight alliances, safe zones, and wellness programs.

The model code presented in the brief builds on the research findings and policy recommendations. It contains a range of options for state legislatures to adopt, including general prohibitions against bullying, harassment, and intimidation in the schools, general prohibitions against discrimination in the schools, and specific prohibitions barring discrimination against and mistreatment of LGBTs. Also included are ideas for statutory policies that may be adopted pursuant to such prohibitions, and sections addressing teacher education and professional development.

Safe at School documents the persistence of hostile and unsafe school environments that can result in lower educational outcomes and higher rates of depression and suicide for LGBT students. Kids are hurting and are dying. It’s time to act.


Follow my blog every day by bookmarking And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at Bookmark it!

By Valerie Strauss  | October 4, 2010; 9:30 AM ET
Categories:  College Life, Guest Bloggers, Kevin Welner  | Tags:  gay students, gay suicides, harassment of gays, harrass and gays, lgbt, lgbt students, lgbt suicides, safe campuses, safe schools, students suicide, suicides  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Book blasts research base for Obama reform plan
Next: Willingham: How to teach collaboration


Almost all steps are revolving around reactionary measures making others accountable. How about teaching not to engage in sexual behavior outside man-women? Don’t we all agree that primary reason for sex for pro-creation. Anything outside that depends upon 1 or 2 (and may be more) individual (s)personal choice. We should question that personal choice. If less and less people are making that choice, we will have lesser issues surrounding this behaviour.

Posted by: ajsona | October 4, 2010 2:13 PM | Report abuse

@ajsona -- setting aside whether I agree or disagree with your premise, understand that bullying starts well before students engage in sexual activity. Even there was merit to your idea of instilling in gay kids the idea that their sexual orientation is "all wrong," it wouldn't fix the problem of bullying. In fact, the very concept you suggest is quite likely the root cause of all the bullying, and the resultant suicides and murders.

Posted by: pcobrien2001 | October 5, 2010 4:39 PM | Report abuse

That the very first comment is an attack on LGBT citizens shows all the more the need for this.

In response, though:

If we all agreed that the primary reason for sex was procreation, then either people would have sex only a few times in their entire lives, or the world would be absolutely overrun with unwanted children (moreso than now, I mean).

Furthermore, being LGBT is in *no way* a choice. The only choice is whether or not to accept one's self and live honestly, or remain closeted and miserable.

Posted by: LightningBaltimore | October 6, 2010 12:43 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.

characters remaining

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company