Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity

Posted at 11:30 AM ET, 09/24/2010

Meier: White knights and false villains in education

By Valerie Strauss

This was written by prominent educator Deborah Meier on her Bridging Differences blog, which she co-authors with historian Diane Ravitch on the Education Week website.

Meier and Ravitch exchange letters about what matters most in education. Meier is the founding principal of Mission Hill School in Boston and a renowned education reformer. Her latest book, written with Brenda Engel & Beth Taylor) is "Playing for keeps: Life and learning on a public school playground."

Dear Diane:
Forty-five-plus years ago, when I sent my children off to our local Chicago public school and started to substitute around Chicago's South Side schools (to earn a little money), I was amazed. The one feature that stood out was the disrespect shown toward teachers, and not surprisingly toward the children and their parents.

Like you, my interest in public education was in its capacity to nourish the health of a fuller democracy—to give all kids what I thought was being offered to the richest and most favored.

I even thought we had succeeded and that the only question was how to move from a few hundred examples to a few thousand. I never assumed our approach had to persuade everyone and welcomed other ways of answering the common question: What does a modern democracy require of all 18-year-olds to survive-plus? I assumed there was room for more than one answer.

At Central Park East, we had our movies—a few documentary films describing some of our examples—including Fred Wiseman's three-hour opus on Central Park East Secondary School and our own homemade film on "Graduation by Portfolio," and a small, award-winning film about a combined 2nd and 3rd grade classroom at CPE: "We Know Why We're Here." There was one little film about our violin program ("Small Wonders") that even attracted some interest in Hollywood. Other schools followed suit. (Urban Academy produced dozens.)

But they hardly compared with "Waiting for Superman"!

This is hardly surprising because, in fact, when Hollywood got hold of "Small Wonders," they turned it into something rather different: a story about bad teachers, bad unions, and heroic white saviors. They publicized it as the "true" history of the music program at Central Park East school in East Harlem. They even had shots of the exterior of the actual CPE and roughly followed the history of the violin teacher. Except ...

They made the school's longtime, full-time music teacher—a remarkable guy named Barry Solowey—into a lazy, incompetent teacher who depended on the union to keep his job while the hero—Roberta—was threatened by a citywide lay-off. Barry had served 250 kids a year for more than a decade; Roberta served 100 eager volunteers—in three CPE-like East Harlem Schools (about 30-40 in each) for three or four years (at that time). Barry saw every class weekly, produced an annual opera and a Broadway musical, and ran three choral groups,—who also sang in Carnegie Hall— and he taught recorder to every interested child. Both teachers did superb work. But imagine our shame when we saw what Hollywood had done to the character clearly meant to describe Barry and a school called Central Park East.

They needed a "knight on a white horse" to make the story a popular hit. "Music of the Heart" (with Meryl Streep) was merely following the long-before, laid-out script about public schools and teachers and the organizations they fight to create.

There's a long line of such films that highlight the lonely life of the great teacher. In fact, if they are indeed sometimes lonely, it's because they are breaking the rules—not those set by the unions, but by Management. Probably we need to make a list of all the rules that are imposed against teachers, not on their behalf by their unions. If it were otherwise, how come all the states (such as Texas) that don't allow unions even to have contracts follow so many of the same inane routines?

The same is true of many of the books, some of which become movies. Sometimes we have a strong black man, but usually it's a highly cultured but tough white person who refuses to lower his/her expectations and never gives an inch.

We're now entering the age when "tough love" is the plot when it comes to teachers and parents. Only it's they who we need to be tough on. It's all those smart young people who went into teaching in the late 1960s and '70s (some to avoid the draft) with their permissive spoiled-brat histories who become the villains of the new wave of school-based romances.

Neither tough-love imposed by elite Ivy League grads nor the generous-love imposed by elite draft-dodgers—forgive the unfair labels—will do.

We need schools in which adults are treated like adults by those "above" them in the hierarchy—which has hardly ever been the condition of public schools, especially those serving poor communities.

We need adults who demand ever more democracy in their schools, where adults join together to present their approach to being well-educated by modeling it in the presence of children.

The school is where we can teach both children and adults the habits of mind on which democracy thrives. We need interesting and powerful adults who can help raise another generation—of interesting and powerful adults.

We need adults who are treated with the kind of respect that suggests to the young that it's good to grow up and join adulthood. We need schools that treat the adults at home likewise—families that need to raise their children's aspirations even as their own have been crushed.

How those of us who have spent our lives fighting for such reforms have been cast as the "status quo" is remarkable. Those who preceded me and no longer are alive—the Lillian Webers and Ted Sizers—would be startled by the labels the new "reformers" have given them. I believe people can call themselves what they like. But I wish I had enough money and power to prevent them from successfully re-labeling others as lazy, self-interested, money-grubbing purveyors of low expectations.

It would be fun to re-read some of the old classics and watch some of those films before we allow even recent history to be rewritten and distorted to demonstrate that nobody ever had a good idea until "they" came along.

Yes, Diane, I suppose I'll have to go see the "Superman" film someday—as I finally did make myself see "Music of the Heart." But I also suggest folks watch a wonderful recent French movie on a similar subject, treated honestly: "The Class."



Follow my blog every day by bookmarking And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at Bookmark it!

By Valerie Strauss  | September 24, 2010; 11:30 AM ET
Categories:  Deborah Meier, Guest Bloggers, School turnarounds/reform  | Tags:  deb meier, deborah meier, diane ravitch, ivy league, school reform, school reformers, tough love, waiting for superman  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: Turning schools into robot factories
Next: The education of Oliver Stone


Dept of Edu reviewer comments from the first RTTT round of funding:

"the panel says a closer look the data "show mixed results and continuing and sizeable achievement gaps." The District earned 21.6 out of 30 points in this area. Officials raise the question of whether the gains reflect an initial shock of reform that will fade over time, or something more permanent:

"The number of points awarded to this section is due to the concern that the quick gains may be the result of the newly imposed expectations rather than proven instructional practices that will need to be sustained over time. The District would need to analyze the achievement data and explore the connections between the data and the sustainable actions that have contributed to sudden academic gains to determine if the projected goals are fully attainable."

Finally, the District's application took a hit for its tone and approach in the section entitled "Great Teachers and Leaders." Overall, it garnered 111.8 of a possible 138 points. Reviewers took exception to the District's assertion that a Race to the Top grant would be a vindication in light of the political resistance to some of Rhee's personnel moves, and would position DC "to ensure that its cutting edge human capital work can be accelerated and become a national model for innovative human capital."

Reviewers questioned whether the District was more interested in showcasing its "speed in achieving results and to become a national model" or in committing to the "detail and attention needed to build the capacity of staff to become great teachers and leaders."

Posted by: thelildiva4u


Posted by: honestaction | September 24, 2010 12:38 PM | Report abuse

(reference: "knowyourfacts")

The DCPS decline in test scores
in elementary schools
(Reading and Math) now reflect 2007 levels.
In actuality the drop was 4 points of proficiency.
These drops in elementary reading and math represent
an overall drop of 9-10% fewer elementary children
scoring proficient compared to last year.

One of the realities of Rhee's brand of reform leadership is that our youngest children are not being taught well .
See here =>

If the reforms were having an impact one would expect
that the third graders who entered the school system
when Rhee did 3 years ago, and are taking the DC CAS
tests for the first time, would have shown great promise now. Unfortunately the opposite is true;
the test scores show declining proficiency rates.

The most difficult thing about being a parent of a child in
DCPS is the huge lack of analysis in the mainstream media and
the general spread of misinformation about the nature of
educational gains (or lack there of). We have a lot to learn from our third graders and owe them a qualified educational leader who can truly enable them to have high-quality learning experiences.

Unfortunately for DC teachers, the greatest beneficiaries of Rhee's lack of real educational leadership have been the charters -- because people have flocked to them for cover as Rhee closed 20 some schools. But perhaps as a teacher you and your colleagues at the charter should ask yourself why isn't the quality of the schools good enough. Why aren't all children everywhere being provided with the curriculum rich learning experiences you benefited from at the private school? What needs to happen next to ensure that goal?

I assure you it is not it has nothing to do with the desperation
and other articulate passions expressed by people like Rhee.
It has to do with getting to the hard work of providing children with significantly enhanced academically rigorous curriculum
and learning experiences -- including their families in the process. Passion (and broom-mongering) aside, Rhee
really didn't bring it --
nor was she headed in that general direction in my view.

I have heard Gray speak on the educational issue and he has stated that he will move forward with reforms just not with the expansion of testing as Rhee planned. Hopefully that will mean that our children are getting higher quality instruction here in
DC, rather than Rhee's' teaching to the test' approach which has hijacked meaningful, viable real education.


Posted by: honestaction | September 24, 2010 12:55 PM | Report abuse

input this URL:
you can find many cheap and fashion stuff
(jor dan s-h-o-e-s)
(NBA NFL NHL MLB j-e-r-s-e-y)
( lv h-a-n-d-b-a-g)
(cha nel w-a-l-l-e-t)
(D&G s-u-n-g-l-a-s-s-e-s)
(ed har dy j-a-c-k-e-t)
(UG G b-o-o-t)


Posted by: linxiuli7678 | September 27, 2010 10:02 PM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company