Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity


Posted at 9:48 AM ET, 03/18/2010

A principal critiques Obama’s education plan

By Valerie Strauss

My guest is George Wood, principal of Federal Hocking High School in Stewart, Ohio, and executive director of the non-profit Forum for Education and Democracy, a collaboration of educators from around the country

By George Wood
As a school principal, I read everything about education with an eye towards how it will affect my school and my kids. So it is with the recently released ‘blueprint’ from the Obama Administration and its proposed changes to federal education policy, most recently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB).

I have approached the upcoming reauthorization of the law with cautious optimism. During the last campaign season I heard lots of talk about ending the over-reliance upon standardized tests, supporting teachers, and equalizing educational opportunities. I hoped this would mean my school, our teachers and our kids would have something to look forward to.

Not wanting to wait for Congress to get around to coming up with what we should be doing, the team of educators that I work with at The Forum for Education and Democracy is releasing our own blueprint next week. So I read the administration’s vision while thinking about both what The Forum will propose and what my kids need.

Here is a short comparison of key points:

First, I am pleased that the administration has finally realized that the key role of the federal government in public education is to ensure equal opportunity for all kids. In several places, the Obama blueprint calls for equalizing funding across schools, requiring states to address resource disparities, and holding states accountable for providing teachers and principals with the supports they need.

The administration’s blueprint does not, however, go far enough. In fact, by making more Title 1 funds based on competition, rather than going to support the schools with the highest numbers of low-income students, the administration’s plan may increase rather than decrease the inequity about which they are concerned.

In the case of my school, the funding disparities are not between schools in the district — we are the district’s only middle and high school. Rather, the issue is the continued disparity in our state, where some schools spend over three times more per student than we do.

This is the case in state after state, as schools that serve the poorest children in the most challenged neighborhoods have fewer resources to help students than those schools in wealthy community. That is why The Forum will be calling for the federal government to use its appropriate powers to allot funding to states based on the state’s movement towards resource equity for every child.

Second, I was happy to see the focus on teachers throughout the administration’s plan. NCLB avoided any serious support of teachers, leaving it to the endless filling out of form and taking of courses to determine if highly qualified teachers were teaching students.

The administration needs to be bold in the final proposals it rolls out to support teachers.
In my school, we have lost several great teachers because they could not make enough money to pay off student loans. Our teacher support programs, built around teacher leadership, professional development on-site, and common planning times for teachers who share students, are done with little or no support from the feds or the state.

This is why The Forum will call for a radical overhaul of teacher preparation, including mentoring of all new teachers, financial support for teachers that work in hard to staff schools, and funds to provide high quality professional development and support activities in each every school.

The biggest disappointment for me in the administration’s blueprint is that they do not address the over-reliance upon high-stakes standardized tests for federal accountability.

It is hopeful to see the administration at least acknowledge that improved assessments that focus more on actual student performance should be developed. But what happens in the meantime? It appears that the plan is just to keep on testing, using the same tests that Secretary Duncan has acknowledged are inadequate, and then ratchet up the punishments for schools that do poorly and provide cash prizes for schools that do well.

This will do little to turn back the culture of testing that has overtaken all of our schools. Even at my school, we engage in test preparation activities, not because we think our kids are not learning, but because the higher order intellectual skills on which we focus are not on the type of test they take.

Desperate to avoid being labeled as the worst schools —which could lead to mass firings — and anxious to earn the few extra dollars on the table, schools will continue to engage in test-prep agendas, pep rallies, and all sorts of student accounting tricks to get test scores up.

All the while, little will change in terms of daily teaching and learning practices; in fact the focus on test scores will further calcify school practices that are focused on memory and rote rather than thinking and logic. Ending Adequate Yearly Progress, which is not mentioned in the blueprint but has been spoken about in hearings, is a good start. But it’s not enough.

The Forum will call for rethinking assessment across the board, including a greater use of performance assessments, school visitation teams, and information about school climate when looking at educational success.

Further, it is time to end the radical experiment that judges our children and our schools by answers bubbled in on a machine-scored test. We will recommend a wide selection of measures that will serve to inform teaching and learning, and let each community know clearly what, and how, their children are learning.

Fourth, it does look like the Administration values innovation, and providing funds for new promising practices. This is great news for my school, which has advisories, an integrated curriculum, student internships, senior portfolios, school-wide writing rubrics, and no tracking and ability grouping. Often these are done in spite of rather than with the support of federal policy.

But we are not a charter school — thus, we are eligible for only slightly more than half the pool of federal money for innovation. Out of $900 million set aside for innovation, $400 million is designated for charter schools. Charters educate around 5% of the kids in our county, so why the largess? The Forum will call for innovation funds as well, but we want everyone – public and public charter schools – to have equal access to them.

At my school, we need more change than the Administration blueprint seems to be calling for. We need a greater emphasis on equity that guarantees for my students that their educational opportunities will not be based upon zip codes; we need teachers that are not only well-prepared and well-supported to teach in ways that are engaging and challenging, but who also do not have to sacrifice their financial well-being to work with our kids; we need to stop feeding the national culture of testing so we can establish a national culture of learning; and we need a fair and equal shot at all federal funds for innovation, regardless of what type of school we are.

After a decade of tinkering around the edges and making it harder for successful schools like mine (we graduate over 95% of our kids, with the vast majority going on to college and succeeding there — and all this in a community with an average family income of around $22,000) to do our best work, it is time for a bold change in federal educational policy.

While the administration’s blueprint offers some good first steps, I hope the actual legislation rolled out focuses even more attention on equity, teaching, and innovation – and less on punishment and sanctions.

George Wood’s blog, 5000 Hours, can be found at http://georgewood5000hours.blogspot.com/.

-0-

Follow my blog all day, every day by bookmarking washingtonpost.com/answersheet And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our new Higher Education page at washingtonpost.com/higher-ed Bookmark it!

By Valerie Strauss  | March 18, 2010; 9:48 AM ET
Categories:  George Wood, Guest Bloggers, No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top  | Tags:  No Child Left Behind  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: College visits: The ‘East Coast’ thing
Next: Video game hurts schoolwork of boys--study

Comments

He gets it

Posted by: mamoore1 | March 18, 2010 12:18 PM | Report abuse

Secretary Duncan needs to tackle the big problem, "the culture of testing" that wrecked NCLB. It wasn't the letter of the law but the panic it produced that worsened the culture of compliance. The new ESEA could be worst for those of us in the bottom 5% of schools.

Almost nobody agrees with me, but we should merge the teachers and principals unions. In the meantime we should enjoy the advertisement in Education Week, where Gerald Tirozzi of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, answered the prennial question:

Question: How many educators does it take to screw in a light bulb?

Answer: I don't know. Let's fire the principal.

Posted by: johnt4853 | March 18, 2010 12:26 PM | Report abuse

Thank you George Wood!

Also hope to read something from you and the Forum for Education and Democracy about the contributions the ARTS make in
students'ability to be innovative and in other areas of their lives.

Posted by: PLMichaelsArtist-at-Large | March 18, 2010 12:59 PM | Report abuse

I suggest that George Wood replace Arne Duncan as Secretary of Education immediately.

Posted by: skrashen | March 18, 2010 3:42 PM | Report abuse

Dr. Woods,
You are AMAZING!!! But I want more. I want to know specifically what I can do and what I can tell everyone I know what they can do to support The Forum for Education and Democracy's blueprint. I will share with EVERYONE I know the blueprint when it comes out on your blog. I also want to tell people exactly what we can do to create the change we need in the NCLB law to do exactly what your article states.
I have been researching and applying quality assessment in my classroom, and I get there are better ways to assess students.
Please tell me more. I'm a member of NCTE, the Writing Project, and other organizations. I have written letters to my representatives around literacy and 21st Century education.
If you need me to play the lottery to win a million dollars and send it to the forum, I'll do it.
Can you just give me the specifics as to how to best get our voices heard? What can we all do to get the changes you are calling for implemented?
Do we create a "Tea" cher party of our very own? :-)
Thank you for what you are doing on behalf of all kids in this country.

Posted by: tutucker | March 18, 2010 9:23 PM | Report abuse

Good for you and your school. We need more principals like you.

Posted by: celestun100 | March 18, 2010 9:38 PM | Report abuse

As always, thanks for your comments. For tutucker, we will be sending our full comments on ESEA out next week. Check The Forum's website at www.forumforeducation.org next week and it should be up by Friday. Then take it to your representative and senator and ask them what they are going to do.

Posted by: DocWood | March 19, 2010 10:54 AM | Report abuse

Not only will I take your full document and give it to my legislators, but I will give the document to as many people as possible to give to their legislators.
I hope we all do our part in creating a better education for our kids!!

Posted by: tutucker | March 19, 2010 11:34 AM | Report abuse

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company