Assessing teachers without fetishizing test-based reforms
This was written by Kevin Welner, a professor of education policy and program evaluation in the School of Education at the University of Colorado at Boulder, and director of the National Education Policy Center. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By Kevin G. Welner
Remember how “the soft bigotry of low expectations” beautifully encapsulated a serious equity issue and then led to a destructive No Child Left Behind law that has narrowed the curriculum and forced educators to over-test students and teach to tests?
We are, I fear, now at the same point with teacher quality.
Lost within the ongoing craziness of leaders using teacher and principal dismissal as a primary strategy to fix public schools (along with the echo chamber of irresponsible punditry and filmmaking) are some important truths about teacher quality.
Teachers are indeed the most important element of formal schooling, and the current system does disproportionately burden low-income communities of color with teachers who are less experienced, less supported, less prepared, and less credentialed. This is an important equity issue, and it should be addressed in a serious way.
The problem, of course, is that it’s being addressed in a foolish way. The New York City data dispute is only the latest example, joining the Los Angeles Times’ decision to misuse and publicly release teacher performance data; the Klein, Rhee, et al. “Manifesto”; the Race to the Top push for the disproportionate use of student data in teacher evaluations; and various state-level measures that will likely in fact require student test data to be used for half of teacher evaluations.
After almost a decade of NCLB, our policymakers are still fetishizing student scores on standardized tests, using them as a crutch instead of turning to balanced, sensible solutions. But there is an alternative.
A new policy brief released today by the National Education Policy Center describes authoritative research documenting a wide range of useful criteria for assessing teacher quality and effectiveness.
The brief, prepared by Penn State professor of education Patricia Hinchey, concludes that there’s a role to be played by value-added models based on student standardized test scores but stresses that this role must be de-emphasized and balanced with other policy and management tools to support and sustain high-quality teaching.
These include classroom observations and evaluations by administrators and others, as well as portfolios prepared by teachers that document a range of teaching behaviors and responsibilities, and other sources of information.
The brief, called "Getting Teacher Assessment Right: What Policymakers Can Learn from Research," is one of a series of briefs supported in part by the Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice, and it suggests that policymakers carefully think through the purposes and available methods of teacher assessment before settling on one particular solution to the exclusion of others.
As Hinchey observes, “Since any teacher assessment system must address multiple goals, it should rely on multiple sources of information.”
Fostering high-quality teaching is a central goal of education reform. Yet the overuse and misuse of test-score data, much in vogue now among government policymakers and district leaders, is not supported by the research. We are wise to embrace teacher quality as a goal; we are also wise to demand research-based policies that will accomplish that goal.
Follow my blog every day by bookmarking washingtonpost.com/answersheet. And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at washingtonpost.com/higher-ed Bookmark it!
| December 7, 2010; 5:00 AM ET
Categories: Guest Bloggers, Kevin Welner, Teacher assessment | Tags: assessing teachers, los angeles times, no child left behind, race to the top, standardized tests, teacher assessment, teacher evaluation, test scores, value added
Save & Share: Previous: Michelle Rhee, celebrity, goes national
Next: Sample PISA questions given to 15-year-olds
Posted by: educ8er | December 7, 2010 10:43 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: skrashen | December 7, 2010 4:31 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: PGutierrez1 | December 7, 2010 5:18 PM | Report abuse