Saving public education: the 'Dolly Solution'
This was written by Richard Slettvet, a special education teacher in Washington State. Prior to entering the teaching profession he worked as a U.S. Navy officer and for two Fortune 500 companies. He believes that many school reform advocates in government and industry would have a tough time surviving a single year as a classroom teacher in a public school.
By Richard Slettvet
I am proposing the Dolly Solution as an alternative to Charter Schools Secretary Arne Duncan’s “Race to the Top” (AKA, Grovel for Lucre) reform initiative, which, if other federal education programs are any guide, is destined to end in a muddle of red tape, unfunded mandates, and unintended consequences.
The Dolly Solution refers to Dolly the Sheep, country-music superstar Dolly Parton’s namesake, not to Ms. Parton’s 2002 cover of Led Zepplin’s “Stairway to Heaven.” Dolly the Sheep, you may recall, emerged in 1996 from a surrogate ewe to become the first-ever cloned mammal.
What does cloning have to do with saving public education? Well, in three easy steps, it’s the surest route for upgrading the quality of public education from a “C” average to “A+”:
Clone Jaime Escalante. Great teachers like Mr. Escalante, celebrated in the film "Stand and Deliver," are rare as Thomas Jefferson fans on the Texas State Board of Education.
The attributes of extraordinary teachers—some singular combination of intellect, character and creativity, coupled with the energy to sustain a 30-year career—aren’t anything that can be taught in schools of education. A decade of research has shown that even National Board Certification doesn’t guarantee students a better classroom teacher. And having a teacher who is “Highly Qualified” under the No Child Left Behind Act plus $2.50 will buy any student a slice of pizza at the school cafeteria.
In truth, nobody knows where terrific teachers come from—it’s one of those profound mysteries of life, like why Dolly Parton recorded “Stairway to Heaven.”
It probably has something to do with the Bell Curve, which dictates that only 1 to 2 percent of a population can be defined as extraordinary at anything, whether it’s teaching, playing the violin, or hitting a baseball.
For example, the winnowing process in baseball is intense: many good Little League players don’t make their high school teams; many high school letter men don’t win college scholarships or get drafted into the pros; many who do get drafted never make it to “The Show”; and of those who rise to the major leagues, most turn out to be rather mediocre: the typical lifetime batting average, as Stephen Jay Gould famously pointed out, is a rather pedestrian .260.
Want a dugout full of great hitters? Clone Ted Williams.
There is a winnowing process for educators, too: Earning a bachelor’s degree and teaching certificate; making the cut in the resume-screening process—often there are dozens of applicants for a single teaching position; impressing school principals and staff during the rounds of interviews and teaching demonstrations at the hiring school; and surviving sink-or-swim probationary periods of two years or more.
Yet, after all this, most teachers turn out to be, well, average.
It also would be possible to raise the mean level of teaching skill and reduce variation between the lowest and highest performing educators by actively recruiting the best and brightest college graduates into the teaching profession then providing them with superior training, like, for example, Teach for America; but that would be impractical, if not prohibitively expensive, on a national scale.
One problem is that Teach for America recruits sign on for only two years in the trenches, not 30-year careers. There’s also a little problem with the Bell Curve setting an absolute limit on the number of college graduates meeting the annual “best and brightest” cut-off. Teach for America is not a model for sustainable school reform.
Nor are charter schools. Don’t misunderstand; there are some truly excellent charter schools, but the ones that surpass their public school counterparts tend to be heavily funded by private foundations trying to make a point and—Bill and Melinda Gates’ billions notwithstanding—there is a limit on available private funding.
One would have more confidence in some of the more prominent charter school boosters if they had some actual experience as teachers in a public school classroom. Arne Duncan, for one.
And Bill Gates doesn’t even have experience as a public school student, having graduated from the uber-elite Lakeside School in Seattle, where all or the children are waaaaaay above average.
Ergo, the surest way to achieve universally-fantastic teaching is to clone Mr. Escalante.
At the same time, replicating strings of DNA in the cause of higher test scores also could be employed from the opposite direction, home; that is, load the pipeline at its source with an uninterrupted flow of highly motivated and supported kids (another advantage of the top charter schools):
Clone Heathcliff and Clair Huxtable. Studies have shown that students who live in two-parent households with high socioeconomic status (SES) have significant advantage over their classmates. Indeed, teachers have been known to bribe principals with dark chocolate to be assigned the progeny of parents the likes of Heathcliff, an obstetrician, and Clair, an attorney.
(After the feds have finished coupling teachers’ salaries to standardized test results—one hopes that history teachers in Texas will be granted waivers—the vig will rise like hands at a Bainbridge Island PTA auction.)
Sadly, but no surprise to teachers, the Department Education reports that the percentage of high-poverty schools grew steadily over the past decade, and that data was collected before the shock waves of the current depression hit American families.
A less-radical plan than cloning parents with high SES might be for the feds to implement economic policies that promote family-wage manufacturing jobs and healthy communities, as opposed to outsourcing, bailouts for financial industry malefactors, and continuing tax breaks for the wealthy, but that would require extraordinary leadership:
Clone George Washington....
Follow my blog every day by bookmarking washingtonpost.com/answersheet. And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at washingtonpost.com/higher-ed Bookmark it!
| October 24, 2010; 3:36 PM ET
Categories: Charter schools, Guest Bloggers, No Child Left Behind, Race to the Top, School turnarounds/reform | Tags: arne duncan, cloning, dolly parton, dolly the sheep, education department, george washington, jaime escalante, led zeppelin, no child left behind, public schools, race to the top, school reform, schools, stairway to heaven, stand and deliver, teachers, ted williams
Save & Share: Previous: Building teacher accountability from the ground up
Next: The real effect of teachers union contracts
Posted by: dcproud1 | October 24, 2010 6:09 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: morse99 | October 24, 2010 7:17 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: MathEdReseacher | October 25, 2010 8:36 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: bpeterson1931 | October 25, 2010 1:40 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: jlp19 | October 25, 2010 4:45 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: jlp19 | October 25, 2010 4:47 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: Saison | October 26, 2010 3:04 PM | Report abuse
The comments to this entry are closed.