Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity


Posted at 5:00 AM ET, 01/24/2011

Teacher: The worst of "best practices"

By Valerie Strauss

This was written by Roxanna Elden, the author of See Me After Class: Advice for Teachers by Teachers. She teaches high-school English in Miami and is a National Board Certified Teacher. This piece explains how the push for teachers to use "best practices" can get out of hand, and it will make you both laugh and cry. It first appeared on Rick Hess’s blog, Straight Up, on the Education Week website.


By Roxanna Elden
District, county, and state education offices are fond of sharing "best practices" through professional development. The idea is to spread the word about strategies that work in some schools so other teachers can use these strategies and get the same great results. There are times when it works this way. Unfortunately, things can get complicated when the same people who pick and distribute best practices are also responsible for checking whether they are being done correctly, and when none of those people are current teachers. Here's an example of how the sharing of best practices sometimes works once supervising offices get involved.

Phase one: A school seems to be successful in educating students in a given subject or demographic sub-group. Let's call this School A.

Phase two: A team of people who want to know what made School A successful descends upon the school. They sit in the classrooms. They ask questions. Then the team comes back with a report that says something like, "Teachers at School A are successful because they ask students to make their own test using fill-in-the-blank test questions. This is a research-based report."

Phase three: The information from the report is filtered through a series of people sitting in a quiet, student-less office. Materials are created. Packets are made.

Phase four: Packets with newly created materials are distributed at "best practices" training sessions throughout the district, county, or state. Teachers are advised that the district, county, or state "people" will be looking for evidence of implementation next time they come to observe. In the fill-in-the-blank question card example, evidence of implementation is to be demonstrated by displaying laminated copies of the question cards on classroom walls, although the questions are written in 10-point font that is too small to read from any student desk.

Phase five: Teachers at another school--let's call it School B--attempt to implement the research-based best practice. Here is an example of how that works using the fill-in-the-blank question cards:

Phase 5.1: Teachers in School B distribute cards, which are aligned with current state benchmarks and contain fill-in-the-blank questions such as "How does _____ in paragraph ______ relate to ______ in paragraph _____." Teachers explain to students that they will be using these cards to write their own test questions based on the material. Students in School B rewrite the questions without filling in any of the blanks.
Phase 5.2: A few teachers from School B re-teach the question card activity, explaining that students need to actually fill in the blanks of the question with information from the book. Students rewrite the questions, this time filling in blanks with meaningless information that does not show understanding of the questions or book.
Phase 5.3: One teacher from School B spends multiple hours of personal time creating supplementary materials to make the question cards more understandable. The teacher shares these supplementary materials with other teachers at School B, who are all having similar problems with the cards.
Phase 5.4: Teachers from School B re-teach the question cards again. Student work is still incoherent. The teachers realize that time spent explaining the question cards has taken away from time spent explaining the material that the questions are supposed to review.
Phase 5.5: Teachers from School B put the task cards and supplemental materials away until next year, not knowing that the district will reshuffle all benchmarks at the end of the year and create new fill-in-the-blank question cards, which will make all teacher-created supplemental materials useless.

Phase six: The district, county, or state office of education redeploys the special ops "best practices" checkup team to School B. They note that some of the teachers in School B have taken the laminated question cards off their walls. In the report that follows, this "lack of implementation of best practices" is used to explain why School B is less successful than School A.

Phase seven: The teacher from School B runs into a teacher from School A at happy hour and asks for advice on using fill-in-the-blank question cards. The teacher from School A says, "I don't use fill-in-the-blank question cards. I just used them one day because the district was watching us, but then I stopped because the kids didn't get it."

Phase 7.1: Teacher A is required to buy Teacher B a drink.
Phase 7.2: While at happy hour, both Teacher A and Teacher B share classroom strategies that actually work.

The most effective professional development I ever attended was a summer program known as the Zelda Glazer Writing Institute (recently renamed the UM-MDCPS Glazer-Lorton Writing Institute). All of the instructors at the Institute are long-time teachers. They share what works for them, and attendees are encouraged to take away the ideas that will work in their own classrooms. No one strategy is advertised (or enforced) as a guaranteed fix, but it is the kind of genuine, comprehensive, non-insulting professional development that actually improves instruction. There is always a waiting list for the Zelda Glazer Writing Institute, even though it is unpaid, and two weeks long, and held during the summer.

If supervisors are serious about spreading the news on best practices--and they should be--there are two factors to take into consideration. First, even the best of "best practices" won't work in every classroom. Requiring "evidence of implementation" of any given strategy is more likely to force a dog-and-pony show for observers than it is to improve teaching. It's the professional development version of "teaching to the test." Second, the best professional development runs with, not against, the ways teachers spread ideas naturally.

Or, perhaps, districts could just send teachers to happy hour and let them share best practices over a few drinks. I volunteer to be part of the research.

-0-

Follow my blog every day by bookmarking washingtonpost.com/answersheet. And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at washingtonpost.com/higher-ed Bookmark it!

By Valerie Strauss  | January 24, 2011; 5:00 AM ET
Categories:  Guest Bloggers, Laugh and cry, Roxanna Elden, Teachers  
Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati   Google Buzz   Previous: What Rhee’s comments about her children say about her
Next: Test scores and economic competitiveness

Comments

Thanks for starting my week off right by a real teacher in the trenches!

Posted by: pat1117 | January 24, 2011 6:57 AM | Report abuse

The ephiphany...or DUH! moment. Teacher planning days or whatever they want to call the days when kids are out of school and teachers either catch up on work or...well whatever they do, should be a day like A&B teachers.

Posted by: jbeeler | January 24, 2011 7:22 AM | Report abuse

Excellent article. And Michelle Rhee wasn't even mentioned once.

The old adage; there's more than one way to skin a cat, holds especially true in public education. Teachers can be effective employing myriad strategies. There is no one best method that's going to reach every student.

What's particularly ineffective, however, is when the teacher stands in front of his/her class and attempts to present the same lesson to the whole class at the same time. Inanity, or what?

All kids are different. They all present themselves on the first day of school with different strengths, weaknesses, and degrees of motivation. To naively believe one lessen for this class is the best method to effectively reach all these kids makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

So why is this the prevailing practice in our schools (K-16) today? Standards reform and fiscal reform are legitimate areas to address but how about what actually goes on in the classroom, you know, pedagogy?

Posted by: phoss1 | January 24, 2011 8:06 AM | Report abuse

"Excellent article. And Michelle Rhee wasn't even mentioned once."

Until you brought her up.

Posted by: efavorite | January 24, 2011 8:29 AM | Report abuse

The best professional development that has kept my teaching fresh and cutting edge over 33 years has come through our professional organizations. Every content specialty has a professional organization and usually every state has an affiliate. For languages we have NECTFL, ACTFL, and in our state NYSAFLT. Math teachers have NCTM; English teacher have NTE. These organizations have K-12 focus, feature real classroom teachers and real best practices, promote elementary-secondary-university articulation and are generally run on a shoestring budget. If only Duncan would discover the treasures that are to be found in our content professional organizations.

Posted by: buckbuck11 | January 24, 2011 9:42 AM | Report abuse

@"Excellent article. And Michelle Rhee wasn't even mentioned once."

Data based commenting:
Last week, Valerie posted 20 columns.
3 dealt directly with Miss Rhee.

As was posted yesterday, if Rhee can stay quiet for a month, I'm sure Valerie and others will.

Posted by: edlharris | January 24, 2011 11:51 AM | Report abuse

The only thing I like about the term "best practices" is the word - minus the s - 'practice'. Over the years I had many ADHD students - and others - that seemed to have little notion or appreciation for the concept of practice. Unless sports or music is involved - and too few students have regular access to music and p.e. anymore - practice often seemed an antiquated notion. Perhaps fallout from the instant magic of computers.

@buckbuck - you are SO right! My best professional development tools came from my fellow colleagues in the various workshops and other exchanges offered from organizations that represented my content area. I suppose Sec. Duncan isn't aware of these because he was never a teacher and therefore had no content area nor experience with these great professional organizations.

Posted by: PLMichaelsArtist-at-Large | January 24, 2011 3:01 PM | Report abuse

"Teacher planning days or whatever they want to call the days when kids are out of school and teachers either catch up on work or...well whatever they do, should be a day like A&B teachers."

The kids aren't always out of school. In two years, I have subbed just about as often for teachers who are down the hall in planning or training sessions or absent to attend a training session elsewhere as I have for teachers who were sick.

Posted by: sideswiththekids | January 24, 2011 3:50 PM | Report abuse

Post a Comment

We encourage users to analyze, comment on and even challenge washingtonpost.com's articles, blogs, reviews and multimedia features.

User reviews and comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions.




characters remaining

 
 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company