The case against NCLB reauthorization
This piece was written by Alexander Russo, a former Democratic Senate aide who writes the widely read "This Week In Education" blog.
By Alexander Russo
Ever notice that it's always Education Secretary Arne Duncan or the pointy-headed wonks talking about how bipartisan education is and how the conditions are (always) ripe for a speedy reauthorization of No Child Left Behind -- but rarely the White House or the education groups or the savvy political operators who actually know what they're talking about?
Truth is, there's no real consensus that now is a good time for a big push to redo the law and in fact it might be a particularly bad time that could lead to the dilution and erosion of the law's best elements.
Ask the most experienced Washington insider you know if now's the time for an NCLB revamp and see what she or he says. (Then ask if they've worked on the Hill or ever done a major reauthorization.) Meantime, here are some of the best reasons that I can think of to wait:
Really bad timing. There's no really good time to do a reauthorization except perhaps during the first year of a new administration when the White House and Congress are controlled by the same party. Two good weeks of work during the lame duck don't change the midterm.
There's no real need. Other than tweaking the 2014 deadline for 100 percent proficiency requirement, there's not much real-world need for an immediate revamp to the law. An annual yearly progress fix could be done in technical amendments, and a handful of other issues could be picked from the groups' regulatory relief wish list (more about that later).
It will attract the crazies (and Republicans). Once they realize that they can't repeal Obamacare and aren't willing to cap the debt ceiling, newly elected Republicans and longstanding Republican National Committee operatives will be looking for other sources of amusement and mischief. Remember that Republicans control the House, the Senate is a legislative free for all, and the 2012 campaign has already begun.
Obama and Duncan have already passed signature legislation. They created the $100 billion carve-out in the 2009 stimulus package, and Race to the Top fund, along with i3 and School Improvement Grants and edujobs, and funded the Common Core Standards initiative. Let's see value-added and removing charter caps and the Common Core standards work their magic before scaling them up or slapping a second round of reforms on top of the first one.
Missing out on new money. The big funding increases that came along with the creation of NCLB in 2002 would not appear if Congress revamped the law in 2011. There's no money. The focus in Congress is on cutting spending not increasing it.
Fanning anger on the left. In case you hadn't noticed it, there's a fierce debate going on within the Democratic Party about who's to blame for the current education system and how to address it best. The left is particularly angry right now and would be quick to attack Democrats who wanted to mend but not end NCLB (and add value-added to high-quality teachers efforts or eliminate charter caps nationally or...).
It makes complete sense that Duncan and his allies would want a reauthorization now. It would give them a chance to codify Race to the Top and School Improvement Grants before we find out what they will and won't actually accomplish. It would give Obama and Duncan something to do with themselves between now and 2013. And there's always the chance that awful things could happen to NCLB even without a reauthorization, via regulation or through an amendment to a spending bill.
But Duncan wanting reauthorization to be so, and making the case, isn't the same as it being a good idea or one with which others agree.
The worst-case scenario is that some of the strongest elements of the law -- making schools report disaggregated data, for example -- could get gutted. At the very least there should be some clear and honest discussion about whether a reauthorization is desirable.
Let's everyone put his or her best arguments on the table and see where we stand. Then, maybe, a reauthorization push.
Follow my blog every day by bookmarking washingtonpost.com/answersheet. And for admissions advice, college news and links to campus papers, please check out our Higher Education page at washingtonpost.com/higher-ed Bookmark it!
| January 19, 2011; 5:00 AM ET
Categories: Guest Bloggers, No Child Left Behind | Tags: edujobs, elementary and secondary education act, nclb, nclb reauthorization, no child left behind, obama and school reform, president obama, race to the top, reauthorization esea, school reforms
Save & Share: Previous: Is Rhee's key D.C. reform being tossed?
Next: Is Rhee's key D.C. reform being tossed?
Posted by: phoss1 | January 19, 2011 7:43 AM | Report abuse
Posted by: joshofstl1 | January 19, 2011 12:11 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: buckbuck11 | January 19, 2011 3:33 PM | Report abuse
Posted by: educationlover54 | January 19, 2011 7:05 PM | Report abuse